Posted on 09/08/2010 1:45:28 PM PDT by Copernicus
This report delineates the various atrocities--and their consequences--committed at the hands of a rogue federal government.
The gist of the atrocities committed in the government-initiated massacre can be summed up in the words of the FBI Deputy Assistant Director Danny Coulson, who wrote the following memo at the time:
'Memo: OPR 004477 Something to Consider 1. Charge against Weaver is Bull $@it. 2. No one saw Weaver do any shooting. 3. Vicki has no charges against her. 4. Weaver's defense. He ran down the hill to see what dog was barking at. Some guys in camys shot his dog. Started shooting at him. Killed his son. Harris did the shooting [of Degan]. He [Weaver] is in pretty strong legal position."'
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Less a hero than a victim that many have empathy for. A shotgun that is sawed off a bit shorter than the law says is o.k. is hardly justification for killing a young boy and his mother.
I agree some of the agents should have gone to jail for breaking the law, but I also think he should be in jail or at least served a prison term.
I find it funny you think all citizens break the law like he did. I dont. I wouldnt refuse to appear in court. I wouldnt saw off shotguns for anybody period. I wouldnt refuse to pay taxes owed. I would however protest too high taxes and vote to change the law. Breaking the law is breaking the law....period.
Remember shots had already been fired by the boy if I recall. Things had escalated way out of control. I would never have put my family in that sort of situation.
ROFLMAO... You are soooo bad! but right on point!
No you're not.
I find it funny you think all citizens break the law like he did.
I didn't say that but I'm not surprised that you would twist my words.
What you or anyone else would have done is beside the point. Who knows what Weaver would have done if it could be all done over again? The point is what actually DID happen, not could’ve would've should’ve.
Bad?
ME?
It takes two to catch me cause I'm gunna deny it.
And your point is? That that statement automatically means ALL citizens? LOL No wonder you make so many mistakes recounting things.
I have researched this several times over the years. One can no more trust the accounts of Weaver and his followers than Lon Horuchi IMO. They are all over the place. I do know this, both parties were at fault in allot of ways. Vickie was a nut, just like Weaver, just like Gritz and a bunch more involved in this. She didnt deserve to die, but she sure deserved prison if she had lived. If not for reckless endangerment of her children.
Does the term "useful idiot*" mean anything to you? It should, since you seem to be intimately involved in actions that one would associate with such a person.
* Quote from V. Lenin.
This is getting hilarious. What percentage of your posts do you have to use that preface for? LOL
Weaver's followers? Who might that be? Vickie a nut? How do you know? You think you know what she deserved and didn't deserve? Right.
You make all these assertions without a bit of support and claim others are all over the place. Right.
“I meant to write “his wife who was near someone who was armed standing in front of a window or door”. Whats his name? Harris? Lost it in copy and paste.”
Sounds like the dog ate your “research” somewhere between the cut and the paste or the door and window or who knows...
I havent been wrong on anything Ive said. Including your assertion that every citizen breaks laws like he did.
Your lapdogging for a white supremacist is just as humorous. Not to mention you wont admit even a small reponsibility on Weavers part. Its obvious to any right thinking person.
Surely you dont think the LEOs shot his wife on purpose? If I recall it hit her and Harris. I admit I find that extremely unprofessional of any sniper unless they couldnt see her behind him at the door. But she could have taken her kids and left at any time. One white flag would stopped it all.
One thing Id like to know....where do you get your first hand Gods honest truth knowledge? (/snort)
Apparently your reading comprehension is nil.
Do you think they shot her on purpose? The ROE allowed shooting armed males I believe, why would they try to kill her.
She was in a dangerous standoff with her baby and son with her and chose to ride it out thereby endangering them both. JMO
Its hard to comprehend alot of crap your denying. As with most who run out of fact you resort to insults. Ouch Im cut to the bone.
Your twisting of words is bordering on ad-hominem. I haven't written one word in support of Weaver's illegal actions. You can either back that up with a quote of mine or, more likely, more of your word twisting.
Not to mention you wont admit even a small reponsibility on Weavers part.
I won't admit any responsibility on his part for illegal and immoral actions taken by government agents. That would be idiotic. Cause and effect, ie personal responsibility for one's actions, doesn't work that way.
Its obvious to any right thinking person.
How would you know? Even if a right thinking person told you that it's doubtful you could keep it straight.
An FBI sniper shot her by accident? If you really wanted to support that contention you could look up Horiuchi's court testimony.
If I recall it hit her and Harris.
If you recall, maybe, might be, could have happened... You make blind speculation a real art.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.