Posted on 09/07/2010 12:57:43 PM PDT by Justaham
President Obama will mark 9/11 at the Pentagon, as he did last year, rather than risk facing angry demonstrators at Ground Zero, where his convoluted remarks and walk back on the Ground Zero mosque might subject him to criticism "like a dog." So the families of the vast majority of 9/11 casualties will be stiff-armed by a thin-skinned commander in chief.
Not exactly a profile in courage.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
He’s not going because he knows it would be seen as a Muslim standing over the site, equivocating. He won’t be able to resist defending the Muslim hordes and trashing U. S. citizens in the process.
-—they want us to be like them. That ain’t gonna happen.
Bravo, Liz!
Exactly. A BS photo-op is there ever was one. I hope stone faced silence greets him at the podium.
-I am glad he is not going. It would be an insult,
a slap in the face of America.
He would have been booed by the New York crowds.
He knows that at the Pentagon the crowd will be made up of
restrained military personnel that won’t boo. -
AMEN! I was going to say that but now I’ll just agree with you.
People can bitch that he’s not going to NY,
but the SOB doesn’t deserve to show his face at the site
of the fallen Twin Towers, where Americans were murdered
by by the evil ‘religion’ he defends and upholds.
And yes, the Pentagon is the obvious choice because
he has to be somewhere, and the military will be much quieter
than the crowds in NY will be.
Notice mrs posotus will also not be in NY.
If JFK had actually written the book, your argument would hold a little more water.
Cowardly wuss.
He’s a moslem.
Absolutely. He knows Americans don't want him anywhere near Ground Zero after his vocal support of the Ground Zero Mosque.
Does that remark show how he regards his own pet dog BO? I think he was lobbing a word bomb at the conservatives because muslims don’t have dogs as pets and to regard him as one would be interpreted as lowly.
Agreed.
I was reacting to the statement made that JFK was the ultimate narcissist in writing Profiles in Courage. My point was that at least JFK could at least honor others. I did not realize the politics attached to that piece. I’m guessing the 40 years since I’ve read it, it has lost some lustre.
I like my dog. I never criticize my dog except when she steals food from the dinner table. If our dear leader was treated like a dog, he would be loved by all.
Something more important on his schedule, golfing or another, his 160th, vacation at the tax payers expense.
Barak Hussein 0bama woof woof woof. This has a better ring to it than mmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmm. Woof woof woof dawg!
IMHO the man is not intelligent and isn't even a particularly good speaker. I think he's gotten along in life by affirmative action and being able to parrot back to liberal academicians and politicians what they want to hear. I'd sure like to see those school transcripts.
I thought he had a ghost writer.
Yes, she has made it abundantly clear she was not proud of her country at that time, or any time for that matter, before her husband was elected.
“He would have been booed by the New York crowds”
I think he would be crucified.
What a POS.
And that's another thing he got wrong.
We do not treat him like a dog -
We don't like him nearly that much and it's disparaging to dogs.
I see him more on the level of a dog's favorite leg.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.