"this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people."
It will increase their being seduced into perversion.
1 posted on
09/02/2010 12:34:16 PM PDT by
GonzoII
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: GonzoII
Ah, NAMBLA moves to Britain!!!! Isn’t radical liberalism beautiful?
2 posted on
09/02/2010 12:35:32 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: GonzoII
3 posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:08 PM PDT by
wastedyears
(Iron Maiden's new album in the top 5 in the US. Incredible)
To: GonzoII
If we want to protect young people, and I do, the best way to do this is not by threatening them with arrest, but by giving them frank, high quality sex and relationship education from an early age.The real meaning
4 posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:20 PM PDT by
frogjerk
(I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
To: GonzoII
Here we go - right back down to the stone ages - - the very thing that toppled great nations - the perversions is the big RED FLAG that signals the end...
5 posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:29 PM PDT by
BCW
(http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
To: GonzoII
Well now, if the age of consent was reduced to zero, then there would be absolutely no sexual crimes against children, ya think?
Moral reprobates.
6 posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:41 PM PDT by
Manly Warrior
(US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" (my spelling is generally korrect!))
To: GonzoII; wagglebee
Celebrate perversity.
Defining deviancy downwards.
7 posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:48 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: GonzoII
“this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people.”
It will increase their being seduced into perversion.
The leftist argument for sexualizing our curriculum here in the states...to make them stronger.
BSTRDS.
8 posted on
09/02/2010 12:36:55 PM PDT by
jessduntno
("There's only one true Christian liberal in the country and that's Mike Huckabee." - Ann Coulter)
To: GonzoII
I bet he his. Nice, the pervs are so enbolden by their PC pulpit that dare to speak the truth of their desires. Not that there is anything wrong with it.
To: GonzoII
I guess this also would lower the age of consent to 14 for HIV and syphilis
10 posted on
09/02/2010 12:37:33 PM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
(NO MOS-que AP: It's the "GROUND ZERO MOSQUE")
To: GonzoII
“saying that this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people”
When they outlaw sex with minors, only outlaws will have sex with minors.
11 posted on
09/02/2010 12:37:40 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: GonzoII
Your place in HELL is reserved scumbag..
To: GonzoII
and that is just what the gay agenda is, and always has been, about; removing the age of consent.
15 posted on
09/02/2010 12:40:21 PM PDT by
dirtymac
(Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Calling all Son's of Liberty)
To: GonzoII
“Britains Leading Gay Activist Calls for Lowering of Age of Consent to 14”
But we are told not to believe that queers and pedophiles are one and the same.
17 posted on
09/02/2010 12:41:29 PM PDT by
Grunthor
(My coffee creamer is fat free because I am not.)
To: GonzoII
Peter Tatchell about to get one...
![](http://www.pinknews.co.uk/images/tatchellpunch.jpg)
![](http://www.moonbattery.com/peter-tatchell.jpg)
18 posted on
09/02/2010 12:43:13 PM PDT by
avacado
To: GonzoII
Inside every “loving, caring, normal” homosexual lies a predatory beast who desperately wants to sodomize your preschool son.
Even the most ardent homofascist realizes that surrendering to those urges will cross the social boundaries todaybut they’re working on it!
19 posted on
09/02/2010 12:43:22 PM PDT by
TruthHound
("He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." --Leonardo da Vinci)
To: GonzoII
A higher age of consent actually puts young teens at greater risk of abuse by reinforcing the idea that young people under 16 have no sexual rights, Tatchell said. They signal that a young person is not capable of making a rational, moral choice about when to have sex. If there is harm caused, it is usually not as a result of sex, per se, but because of emotional abuse within relationships and because of unsafe sex, which can pass on infections and make young girls pregnant when they are not ready for motherhood.
That's kind of an argument FOR abstinence. The sex positive proponents are against abstinence not because it doesn't work but because they see sex as a birthright to be enjoyed by everyone with everything at every age. Not acting on that impulse is "unhealthy".
20 posted on
09/02/2010 12:45:27 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
To: GonzoII
This Tatchell fellow puts a smiley face on lowering the age for sexual consent down to 14 and passes it off as 'protecting the children'. Instead of laughing at him and pointing out the obvious, that he is seeking to allow homosexuals to have sex with 14-year old kids with no legal restrictions, I expect many Britons will nod their heads and say "This makes sense, what a great idea!" Sadly, they will believe this. Another reason why, in many ways, the free western world would appear to be doomed.
To: GonzoII
To: GonzoII
Tatchell, you freakish paedo.
25 posted on
09/02/2010 12:48:35 PM PDT by
agere_contra
(...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
To: GonzoII
will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people. Rightttttt You want 'em younger so you won't be charged with rape, pervert.
27 posted on
09/02/2010 12:52:42 PM PDT by
TribalPrincess2U
(demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson