Posted on 08/31/2010 9:48:24 PM PDT by Man50D
But it does require that the President meet an absolute standard of qualification that can be supported by facts presentable as evidence to a court of law. Those can be documents or the testimony under oath of witnesses -- like parents.
What facts capable of being presented to a court of law do you have that prove Obama is an Article II natural born citizen???
<>That is not what natural born citizen means, or meant then. That’s a birther rewriting of history and the constitution.<>
You mean like the rewriting of this history of the meaning of natural born citizen that has already been written by our founders, historians, Supreme Court Justices, as acknowledged and confirmed by the Senate in 2008??? Hmmmm???
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/
http://theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm#LeahyResolution
>>>> "Most RomneyBOTs on FR, like him, protect Obama because it helps Romney who is also not eligible because of his parents' birthplace in Mexico." <<<<
VERY interesting....
The mere FACT that YOUR fav prez ain't showing proof as to the precise location of his birth, and the FACT that YOU beloved prez hides every single school record from the American public happens to prove that he is a miserable psychopath who is HIDING the Truth of His OBVIOUS Foreign Birth, and that he's got lots of assistance in his SHAM presidency.
IF you think it "means NOTHING" that nowadays I consider the TOTUS to be a clinical PSYCHOPATH, then you are sadly mistaken.... and so are all the rest of his RINO supporters.
. . . * c * r * i * c * K * e * t * s * . . .
You can’t prove anything with a negative. He was certified by Pelosi as meeting the requirements. Where is her proof?
Don't you wish birthers would stop trying?
Didn’t know there was a time limit.
Good news - a 3 star signing on.
Now all we need is a 4 star.
Now that I’ve looked at it, I have to wonder where the lucid part is.
To a FREEPER Attorney -
Is the B.C.(long form) discoverable in this case?
"The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents."
"But it does require that the President meet an absolute standard of qualification that can be supported by facts presentable as evidence to a court of law."
It says nothing remotely like that. Typical birther claim. They think they can just make up stuff about what the Constitution says.
What equivalent facts do you have for any other president? Let's pick one. How about Garfield. What you got on him?
Anyway, it's not my claim. The birther claim is that he isn't eligible. So you should be asking them for their "facts capable of being presented to a court of law".
No. Obama's eligibility has no bearing on this case. Larkin isn't accused of disobeying an order from Obama.
He isn't my favorite president. I think he's a dumbass. You must be projecting. But whether I like him or not has no bearing on the facts of his eligibility. It is irrational to be unable to separate those two things, which is why birthers are fundamentally irrational.
Yep, like that rewriting. Because not one of those things actually says what you tell people they say.
Thank you . . .
The testimony of living credible people at the time, his parents, brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles, other relatives, doctors, midwives, and others who could and would if called upon by a court of law provide the facts of his birth and birth parents proving that he was a natural born citizen.
Where is anyone willing to appear in a court of law to testify to the facts of Obama's birth??? and in their absence where is any documentation???
>The General has been the Convening Authority in many Courts Marshal, and he demands discovery for Lakin. Trust me, this affidavit is rattling the china in the Soebarkah White House.<
I didn’t know that the general was the convening authority in many court marshals but I did read the affidavit in it’s entirety. I had been thinking Lakin was screwed but now that I read that i was VERY hopeful for a successful outcome for him in some fashion. he may not get the birth certificate he wishes to see, but at least I think he won’t go to Leavenworth either.
The man deserves a medal IMO .. he is defending the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic at a cost of great sacrifice.
He belongs in the history books as a great patriot.
On another note, i would love to be a fly on the wall in the Oval office when they discuss this. Obama must be furious and scared at the same time. I would think that he is probably going to have to start making nice nice with people so they don’t put pressure on anyone to make this come out. He will want it to go away bad.
I noticed that you didn't post what it does say.
Typical birther claim.
you mean "typical Constitutional claim", don't you???
They think they can just make up stuff about what the Constitution says
Yeh, it depends upon the meaning of those written words that you leftists want to ignore and rewrite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.