[Uncle Chip]

<>That is not what natural born citizen means, or meant then. That’s a birther rewriting of history and the constitution.<>

You mean like the rewriting of this history of the meaning of natural born citizen that has already been written by our founders, historians, Supreme Court Justices, as acknowledged and confirmed by the Senate in 2008??? Hmmmm???

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/02/founder-and-historian-david-ramsay-defines-natural-born-citizen-in-1789/

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/10/lifelong-democrat-breckinridge-long-natural-born-citizen-means-born-on-the-soil-to-a-father-who-is-a-citizen/

http://theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm#LeahyResolution

[hennie pennie]

Uncle Chip, why is freeper mlo's total response to your lucid cogent posting:

. . . * c * r * i * c * K * e * t * s * . . .

[mlo]

"You mean like the rewriting of this history of the meaning of natural born citizen that has already been written by our founders, historians, Supreme Court Justices, as acknowledged and confirmed by the Senate in 2008??? Hmmmm???"

Yep, like that rewriting. Because not one of those things actually says what you tell people they say.