Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo
The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents.

But it does require that the President meet an absolute standard of qualification that can be supported by facts presentable as evidence to a court of law. Those can be documents or the testimony under oath of witnesses -- like parents.

What facts capable of being presented to a court of law do you have that prove Obama is an Article II natural born citizen???

101 posted on 09/02/2010 7:08:05 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
"The Constitution doesn't require supporting documents."

"But it does require that the President meet an absolute standard of qualification that can be supported by facts presentable as evidence to a court of law."

It says nothing remotely like that. Typical birther claim. They think they can just make up stuff about what the Constitution says.

112 posted on 09/02/2010 9:04:12 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip
"What facts capable of being presented to a court of law do you have that prove Obama is an Article II natural born citizen???"

What equivalent facts do you have for any other president? Let's pick one. How about Garfield. What you got on him?

Anyway, it's not my claim. The birther claim is that he isn't eligible. So you should be asking them for their "facts capable of being presented to a court of law".

113 posted on 09/02/2010 9:06:43 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson