Posted on 08/26/2010 7:06:20 AM PDT by drpix
It has been widely reported that Michael Enright, who has been arrested for attacking the Muslim cab driver, worked as a volunteer for "Intersections International" (II). It has also been reported, in some of those sources, that II was in favor of the Ground Zero Mosque(GZM).
What has not been reported is that this leftist and globalist organization (II), is not merely in favor of the GZM, but lists on its website both the Cordoba Initiative (CI) and the American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA) as "partners." Both CI and ASMA are central to the GZM project and the political/Jihadist activities of the most visible leaders of the GZM effort - Imam Feisal Rauf and his wife Daisy Khan. Iman Feisal & Daisy Khan are co-founders and leaders of both CI and ASMA.
II describes itself as, "A New York-based global initiative dedicated to promoting justice, reconciliation and peace across lines of faith, culture, ideology, race, class, national borders and other boundaries that divide humanity."
Not only does its "partners" include the usual suspects of leftist "diversity" groups, but many of II's "partners" also show up on the Cordoba Initiative's website list of "friends." Among this axis mutually listed on both groups' websites are: Auburn Seminary, Faith House, Interfaith Center of New York, Odyssey Networks and Tannenbaum Center. Link: Cordoba Iinitiative - friends-archive
All this leads to the question: How is it that a volunteer for Intersection Internation - a group so emerged in a web of alliances between leftist-"diversity" groups and Cordoba House and the American Society for Muslim Advancement - attacks a Muslim cabby for being a Muslim?
Noting that reports have Enright captured after injuring himself while escaping through the Cab's window, the next question must be: If he had escaped without being identified, who would the elite media, politicians and other GZM supporters have been blaming? Think Beltway Sniper, Christmas Bomber...
And the ultimate question now becomes: Was this Muslim Cabby Attack a leftist "false flag operation", gone wrong?
I was wondering the same thing, too.
Media/left blames the tea party, Islamophobes:
I sincerely believe ALL Liberals are just like this guy... hypocrites... through and through.
Having it both ways is not illogical to them
“Ideological Suicide” Attacker.
The same segment of society the dog droppings in the press are now blaming by implication.
They're simply leaving out the inconvenient facts.
The time the guy spent in Afghanistan scared the shit out of him and he's a genuine case of PTSD. One of the symptoms is a sense of hyper-vigilance concerning reminders of that which frightened the person and fear that is out-of-proportion to any threat in a given situation.
Not everybody can handle living in a constant threat environment such as the Afghan. Lots of folks have their mind warped by the un-ceasing fear. It happens to a percentage of cops, firefighters, military...and to civilians who put themselves in those worlds.
Too bad Laura Ingraham doesn’t read FR so she could have slapped down the elected NYC fool who tried to tie this attack to the tea party on BOR last night.
Possibly.... but their were a number of "false flag" attacks where the right was set up to be the fall guy. The attacks were front page until the culprit turned out to be crazed leftists - and the story predictably disappeared from the MSM.
I remember one involved an attack by a cross gender leftist/anarchist on a democrat campaign office (or something similar).
She did!
I’d like to hear a lot more details on this “attack” — and the attackee. What’s been described so far seems consistent with self-inflicted wounds. I have to think it’s nearly impossible to stick a knife through the little hole in a cab’s partition and inflict multiple wounds to the driver’s face and neck. Are these superficial wounds? What is their directionality? Where’s the knife? Did driver and fare have prior contact?
The whole episode was set up to generate sympathy for Muslims. One bit sham.
oopsie.....
This is good folks- 10 years ago the media would have been fawning over this poor muzzie cab driver- and it would have helped them to fuel to fire for getting the mosque built
Now I am betting this was a HOAX ! right from the start
The media/left don’t care if they tell the truth. Once a newspaper paints the attacker as a right wing nut who carries a bible around it is picked up and broadcast by other left wing crazies until enough people believe it as truth.
They know what they are doing.
Drunk crazed moron more likely
The guy was slashed and stabbed in a near fatal manner, according to the police report.
So, an individual leftist is capable of murder to further the cause. How much more would a member of the “ruling class” do to further the cause?
Of course this was coordinated. In the local liberal rag the perp is just described (pg 5 small article) as a drunk. If they were interested in divulging his background (i.e. if it was supposed he was a self-described conservative)this would be on the front page, we’d know every connection they’d ever had (fraternities they attended would be described as “cells”, if they were members of a neighborhood watch that would be noted as a right wing vigilante extremist organization) - so far this clearly has the appearance of a coordinated act.
She tried, but the guy was so smug and with an explosive case of diarrhea of the mouth that I think she was caught a bit off guard.
I don’t believe much in coincidences, and this is too strange. A guy who works for the GZM peace and reconciliation crowd attacks a cabbie for being Muslim? If this is a false flag op, it’s really detestable. It was bad enough when the left made up reports of racism against the Tea Party and put the journolist on Sarah Palin, but actually attacking someone to smear the right is a new low.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.