Posted on 08/10/2010 9:25:32 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Laura Ingraham was on the Glenn Beck radio show in the last hour this morning...While talking about potential candidates for 2012, She was asked if Romney was a "progressive" she said NO he isn't one of them at all...I've heard that she loves Romney like a Ken doll and is a Romneybot, but this is amazing!
She also said that she would take Newt as President in a heartbeat!
What gives?
ObamaCare = RomneyCare.
FUMR!!
Laura is part of the “beltway crowd” of Conservatives who can trace their political alliegance lineage all the way back to the RIchard NixOn.
Nixon wowed em up with his “law and order” views in the days of the anti-war hippies and riots.
The Nixon Administration attacked the liberal media, too. Nixon’s FCC issued a Fairness Doctrine ruling against NBC over a news documentary on pensions.
This was raw meat to those conservatives while Nixon detented the Soviets and “opened up” China, cut the “peace” in Vietnam with communist liars. Here at home the government got bigger with the EPA being created.
Nixon had a young media guy working for him named Roger Ailes.
“Fair and Balanced” has its roots in the Richard Nixon attack on the media that attacked Nixon with passion.
And a lot of Bull shit
Oh God!
I was just basing my opinion on what I’ve read about his health care plan in MA, which sounds a lot like obamacare with all the mandates, subsidies and regulations.
*He* may not be a “progressive” of the Saul Alinskey type, but he has progressive ideas.
“Patience is required to grow a good crop.
And a lot of Bull shit”
Evidently we have a difference of opinion, but a further discussion will require an expansion upon the position you endeavor to put forward.
Or maybe rational discussion isn’t one of your strengths. Just observing.
OK, so she's a fellow traveler too. Her radio show, her unfunny puns and her voice couldn't be more irritating.
I quit her several years ago, voice was very aggravating and seems like her show was all about her. I listen for opinions and analysis, couldn't care less about their personal crap.
Weird. I mentioned months ago that on the same day, like they got a memo; Beck, OReilly, Boortz, Hewitt, Medved, Coulter, Ingraham all came out and made fun of birthers.
I dropped em all on that day. Ingraham is a bore like Boortz. Weird that they are all anti-birther and possibly all Romney-bots.
This is one of the reasons I no longer listen to her. Romney-cheerleading is a sure sign of phoniness.
See post 45, Mitt Romney is not a moderate, he is a lefty.
Wait until you learn what he was doing politically and in his personal life before 1994.
What is wrong with Glen Beck’s definition of a Progressive?
Historically, a progressive is someone who wants to use government to effect social reforms.
In reality today, I can’t tell you the difference between a socialists and a progressive.
In fact, they have there own caucus, the Congressional Progressive Caucus. This includes such socialist fruitcakes as:
Lynn Woolsey
Sheila Jackson-Lee
Barney Frank
Alcee Hastings
Barbara Lee
Jerold Nadler
Eleanor Holmes-Norton
Charlie Rangel
Maxine Waters
Henry Waxman
Every one of them is a certifiable Fruit Loop socialist tyrant.
Other self-proclaimed progressive whack-job politicians include:
Al Franken
Cynthia McKinney
Kathleen Sebelius
Howard Dean
Al Gore
The thankfully late Ted Kennedy.
Other people calling themselves progressives are:
Arianna Huffington
Ron Reagan
Bill Maher
Keith Olbermann
Rachel Maddow.
Every single one of the people mentioned above is an out and out socialist. So I am baffled what you meant in saying “HIS definition” about Becks correct use of the term “progressive”, at least in regard to modern progressives.
Furthermore, organizations like the George Soros funded “Center for American Progress” run by John Podesta, calls itself a Progressive organization.
I have no clue if Romney is a socialist or just your typical political whore who will do anything for money and votes, but Glenn Beck’s definition is in direct keeping with all of the above people who are proud and honored to call themselves “Progressives”.
None are moderates, they are all out and out socialists, and they are very proud of the fact.
Wilson was a Progressive, so was Teddy Roosevelt after his presidency, FDR was a Progressive, Obama is a Marxist/Progressive. Romney is a RINO.
August 10, 2010
AUDIO: Laura discusses The Obama Diaries on The Glenn Beck Program
Posted by Staff
(related to race 5:25 min + on Christy, Romney, Newt, Perry — ) ...AUDIO in FULL
I didn’t take from the discussion/interview what you did ‘entirely’ so found the FULL audio. People can
hear the actual interview, and then comment.
You can define Romney any way you like but the bottom line is he is pro socialized health care that is destroying Massachusetts and will destroy the country if not stopped. That’s all I need to know about Romney.
Wouldn't surprise me, I only listen to a little Beck and some Hewitt but it does seem like they're all in lockstep. I wouldn't listen to Beck at all but when I'm out and about I only have two choices, Hannity or Beck, can't stand Hannity.
Neither one of them seem to be Palin fans, they dismissed her pretty quickly considering her current dominance of the conservative movement and potential to take the Republican nomination.
Beck totally dismissed her one day on his show, before he got to the “adult” message of Mitt Romney.
I'm even worried about Sarah Palin.. shes too friendly with republican progressives..
Course she could be a PollyAnna.. or Dorothy in OZ.. (whatever)
Has the BORG landed in Washington D.C.?..
The HIVE seems to taken over most political activity.. both parties..
Machine politics seems to be the rule..
Only intelligent life could be Glen Beck.. but then hes a devotee of MORONI..
Help!.. any other intelligent life out there?.. /snarkosaurus..
Hannity is a lightweight but he is not a sell out on the borther issue like the rest. Neither is Rush, Levin, Savage, Malzberg, the guy in Philly(?) and probably Dennis Miller.
Some dumba*s here said Rush made fun. He was not making fun of birthers - he was making fun of how Obama is covering it up. He was supporting birthers.
Rush does not need cheerleaders but he is ausually pretty true blue and not an RNC shill or pal with RINOs.
Karl Rove however is a RINO.
Well, you see Frantzie. Just cause Mittens acts progressively when in power, does not mean he is a progressive when out of power or running for office. It is like Juan McCain who is not a progressive while he is trying to get re-elected but is a progressive when he has power in the bag.
Laura must be feeling desparate!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.