First Signs of Civil War begin in the US: Sheriff Tony DeMeo Threatens Force Against Federal Agents

Noisyroom.net ^ | 8-7-2010 | Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

[Whenifhow]

It began with one Sheriff speaking with other Sheriffs about their oaths to uphold the constitution. A new movement is growing in this country in support of limited government, constitutional principles, states rights and a stronger role for sheriffs to play against federal abuse of power. In this 3-part video interview with Tony DeMeo, Sheriff of Nye County, Nevada, he explains that he is a Constitutional Sheriff and that authority for public office holders is derived from the people:

SNIP

In his own words Sheriff Tony DeMeo describes an incident where federal agents of the BLM threaten him with arrest while the Sheriff issues his own threats of an armed response if illegal seizures of private property in his county continue. Imagine if BLM authorities went ahead with their “normal” operations of seizing cattle found on public property in direct opposition to Sheriff Tony DeMeo warnings? We would witness a standoff with dire consequences.

Read more at: Constitutional Sheriff Tony DeMeo 3 part video series

http://www.morphcity.com/home/80-constitutional-sheriff-tony-demeo

and…

Nevada Sheriff Tony DeMeo Stands Up to Federal Thugs

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/08/nevada-sheriff.html

[Artemis Webb]

My hope with the “leading questions” was that individuals, especially one’s who have been on FR as long as yourself, would know what the posting policies are. I was hoping they would back off and so avoid creating problems for FR. But I guess you don’t care what happens to this site.

[Rome2000]

What percentage of the population needs to be involved to make it a civil war or a revolution?

When any portion of the active military starts frog marching members of the "Progressive Congressional Caucus" out to be tried for treason, you can be sure its started.

What needs to happen is that the enemy needs to be defined, the CPC is a good place to start.

They are communists operating out in the open and their goal is a marxist takeover of the USA.

They have so far been so incredibly successful that they have nearly achieved their objective without resistance of any sort, they have looted the treasury and subverted the will of the people without even showing up on the radar screen.

They make the terrorists look like chumps by comparison.

[Dead Corpse]

So you have taken it upon yourself to be a self proclaimed thread monitor?

My comment was mild by comparison to some even Jim has made. And yet here you are trying to make hay out of nothing.

Your efforts would be more effective elsewhere.

Also, that last emotional bit of nonsense was the worst kind of non sequitur.

[Artemis Webb]

If your comment was so “mild” why was it removed?

And no...I rather like this thread. I think I’ll stay on it.

[Dead Corpse]

Good question. Why would I know? I'm not the one bringing posts to the Mods attention. Whether you are doing it or they are scanning for keywods is not information I am privy too.

Again, you misinterpret my language.

Feel free to stay on the thread. But wouldn't your energies be better used in support of the Sheriff against out of control Federal encroachment instead of being a tattle-tale hall monitor?

If the latter, then you are violating the "no trolling" ToS even worse than any CWII comment anyone else may be making IMO.

Since this thread deals with a Sheriff willing to use violence against the FedGov, if it comes down to that, maybe you should see if you can get the whole thread pulled? Wouldn't that suit your purposes better?

[Artemis Webb]

Give your blather about being topical to somebody who will believe it. Never once on this thread did you say anything at all regarding Sheriff DeMeo. Now you want to pretend that you came here and were bravely defending the sheriff when that evil Artemis Webb went running to the mods to have your words of courage pulled.

BS
BS
BS

[Dead Corpse]

I'm not sure why you continue to pick a fight, but yes... I did have other posts on this thread.

Why are you working so hard to derail this topic? It isn't just your stated altruism, that would be ludicrous.

The BS is all yours...

[Artemis Webb]

I'll tell you what. Back on post #138 you said, "Look at my home page. Click on the A&M link. Contact me. I'm the MN PoC and I am right here in the open. Who's the "coward"? You get the Mods to help you with fights you start. I'm posting my thoughts out here for all to see."

Now I'll make you deal. You re-post what you said about advocating for violence against the government. Sign your name on the bottom...your REAL name. After all you are "right in the open". So why would you fear for putting your name on the bottom of the statement?

If you do that I'll walk away from the thread. I won't say a word. You can even call me a coward in the the posting and I won't answer back. I certainly won't go to the mods on it as I would love to have it hanging there for all eyes to see.

Come on brave guy. You already said you are out in the open and unafraid. Prove it.

[Dead Corpse]

You re-post what you said about advocating for violence against the government.

Interesting. Now you are trying to goad me into behavior that the Mods have made very clear is a banning offense.

Brave does not mean "foolhardy". I decline to rise to your blatant bait.

[GOPJ]

:)

[DollyCali]

bttt

[TigersEye]

So, it was you who go my posts pulled? Why were your posts pulled? None of them advocated violence. Is it only because you look like an idiot in a discussion?

[Artemis Webb]

I assume my post were pulled for the same reason yours were pulled. Also, since you wish to start with insults, if “looking like an idiot” were grounds for moderator actions you would be totally banned rather than just the target of the occasional comment pull.

[TigersEye]

But it is not grounds for banning and I didn’t say anything like that in the posts that were pulled. I take it you are evading responsibility for getting either mine or your posts pulled!?! Since neither suggestions of violence nor insults are possible reasons what was since you seem to know?

[Arrowhead1952]

Check this out!

[rolling_stone]

pre-revolutionary out of the mouth of a democrat

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIG7awT4c3E

[The Comedian]

Men like this have my immediate respect, and my unlimited dedication to assist.

Gonna contact this excellent man, offer whatever help I can supply.

This is the seed of the Resurgence of Freedom.

Do the same, please.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[Nowhere Man]

What President has ever divided us in such a way? When did we last hear all this talk of civil war and revolution? NASA needs to reach out to Muslims??? We can’t go out for ice cream without having to show our papers? What the heck is next with this dividing, inciting fool? It won’t be civil - not by a long shot.

You know, I feel like I woke up on an alien world, up is down, down is up, left is right, right is left, orange is blue, green is yellow, slavery is freedom, etc. Heck, this would make Htrae, aka "Bizzaro World," in the Superman comics look sane in comparison. Bammy in the White Hut won't stop. Beam me up, Scotty!

[Nowhere Man]

Never once did this country come close to “civil war”. You can only say we came close if you’re easily impressed by loudmouths with anonymity publicly vouching of their courage.

If I may step in for a sec, it took many years for things to build up for the American Revolution and the Civil War. In the first case, the seeds of the Revolution were planted in 1763 when the French and Indian War (or for those folks in Europe, the Seven Years War) ended. The British needed money so they started taxing the heck out of the colonies right away. There was a 12 year span from that point to when the first shots were fired in the American Revolution. The Civil War, it is hard to place, some say the seeds were planted when the Constitution was first put in force but I would have to say sometime in the 1820's after the Missouri Compromise. That's a 40 year period to 1860. I think for this conflict, although it goes back 100+ years with the progressves but I think there was an acceleration from the mid 1960's onward although we did back off the pedal a bit during the Reagan Era and somewhat the same under G.W. Bush. Under Bammy in the White Hut, I fear we are pushing it to the floor.

This stuff is hard to predict when things will start to fly apart, SHTF if you will. However, it will one day. Ever play the game "Ker-Plunk" where you put sticks in the hollow plastic tube and then put in marbles? The players take turns pulling out the sticks, a marble or two will fall, maybe more, maybe none but there will b that last stick where when you pull it, all the marbles will fall. We don't know how many sticks we can keep pulling till it happens but we know Bammy is pulling a stick, then Holder, then Sotomayor, then Pelosi and so on.

[DangerZone]

And who do you expect to fight that war against the feds? The 54% of South Carolina Republicans who still support Lindsay Graham? Maybe the 54% of Arizona Republicans who are about to renominate John McCain?