Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Death of the Dollar
THE AMERICAN THINKER ^ | August 06, 2010 | Vasko Kohlmayer

Posted on 08/05/2010 11:35:11 PM PDT by onyx

Nothing can save our financial system in the long run.  It is doomed to collapse. This is inevitable, because our government controls and manages its very foundation -- the dollar.

The federal government began its takeover of the dollar in 1913 when it established the Federal Reserve Banking System. Prior to that the dollar was a real store of value. In the period from 1783 to 1913 there was a long period of currency stability with virtually no inflation. If you saved one dollar in 1800, your great grandchild could buy roughly the same amount of goods with the same dollar one century later.

In 1913 five dollars could get you the following:

15 pounds of potatoes, 10 pounds of flour, 5 pounds of sugar, 5 pounds of chuck roast, 3 pounds of round steak, 3 pounds of rice, 2 pounds each of cheese and bacon, and a pound each of butter and coffee... two loaves of bread, 4 quarts of milk and a dozen eggs.

In 2010 five dollars barely gets you two pounds of cut chicken meat.

Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 the dollar has shed more than 90 percent of its value. The loss of value has been especially pronounced since 1971 when Richard Nixon took the dollar off the last vestiges of the gold standard. On that date the dollar became a pure fiat currency grounded in nothing but the whims of politicians and technocrats. The consequences have been disastrous. One thousand of 1971 dollars would only buy $185 worth of goods today. This represents a loss of some 80 percent in purchasing power.

The dollar has already entered its terminal phase. The word "doom" is written across it for anyone with the eyes to see. Sad to say, there is no way to reverse its downward slide. With more than $13 trillion in public debt and some $100 trillion in unfunded mandates our federal government has assumed far more obligations that it can ever make good on. Worse still, these figures are growing larger every year.

To put it bluntly, our federal government is flat-out bankrupt. Currency disintegration is always the unavoidable result of government bankruptcy. The dollar -- which has been weakening for many decades -- will at some point go into a sudden death spin.

The only question is when. It may happen six months from now or six years from now. The timeframe is impossible to predict, but we can now for certain that happen it will. No one -- not even the federal government -- can escape the numbers. And the numbers are hideous. One hundred trillion plus is a killer.

Under normal circumstances the dollar would have collapsed already given how impossibly indebted our government is. Some people are puzzled by its continued survival. They say this is just another sign that we live in a crazy world. But there is nothing crazy about it. The dollar is still alive, because there is no ready alternative.

Doomed though it may be in the long term, big time holders of US dollars keep desperately hanging on, because they have nowhere else to go. Where else could China invest its nearly one trillion dollar reserves? There is no easy option. So China keeps propping America's federal debt by purchasing Treasury notes and thus keeping the dollar afloat. It is a bad deal for China and a fortuitous one for the US, at least for the time being. But things cannot go on like this forever. Eventually something will give in and the whole gargantuan house of debt will come crashing down. When that happens things will get ugly.

Some people may say this situation has been brought about by reckless fiscal and budgetary policies rather than by the government's management of the currency. But the ability of government to run deficits is directly tied to its power to manage money.

It is very difficult for politicians to run large deficits if the currency is anchored in something intrinsically real and valuable, let's say gold. This is because when they post large budget shortfalls under a gold standard, people naturally ask them: "Where in the world are you going to get all the gold to pay for all this spending." And since politicians do not know how to make gold, they are forced to admit: "We are going to get it from you, the people, of course. Where else could it come from?"

As you can imagine, such answers do not usually go well with the voting public. The restrictive quality that real money exerts on the profligacy of politicians is often referred as "the golden handcuffs."

As it is now, most people do not think that they will have to pay for the spending incurred by their representatives in Congress. They think that deficits are something that does not concern them directly. They somehow assume the if the government needs more money it can simply issue more bonds. But this way of living is unsustainable and sooner or later the inflow from abroad will stop. Then we will all pay for our government's extravagance by the disintegration of the currency.

Traumatic as it may be, we should not be surprised by this. It has to end this way. This result became ineluctable the moment the American people gave government control over their money. Let's hope that we will learn from our mistakes. Let's hope that when the present monetary regime finally unwinds, we will have the wisdom to lay a more solid foundation for our money than the whims of politicians.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dollar; gold; government; obama; palin; silver
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last
To: Southack
Your major financial transactions in life are: 1. House 2. Salary 3. Stocks

You forgot taxes.

81 posted on 08/06/2010 5:17:56 PM PDT by TruthFactor (The Death of Nations: Pornography, Homosexuality, Abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TruthFactor

51% of people pay no income taxes.


82 posted on 08/06/2010 5:34:51 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Yep, the deflation/inflation argument is about over.

We are in for very hard times.

Remember....God, guns, grub, and gold.


83 posted on 08/06/2010 5:37:38 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TruthFactor
As an aside, what's up with your tag line of “The Death of Nations: Pornography, Homosexuality, Abortion”?

Somehow, I can't see Imperial Spain having died from “Pornography, Homosexuality, Abortion.”

Carthage?

Troy?

Soviet Union?

Somalia?

Confederacy?

Rhodesia?

Words mean things.

84 posted on 08/06/2010 5:38:42 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Income taxes?

What about all the other taxes? Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment insurance, Sales taxes, Utility taxes, Property taxes, Licensing fees...

Thay all add up to a huge amount of money.

85 posted on 08/06/2010 5:47:31 PM PDT by TruthFactor (The Death of Nations: Pornography, Homosexuality, Abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Somehow, I can't see Imperial Spain having died from “Pornography, Homosexuality, Abortion.”

I See your point. But, they sure are doing a job on western civilization.

86 posted on 08/06/2010 5:53:48 PM PDT by TruthFactor (The Death of Nations: Pornography, Homosexuality, Abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: TruthFactor

The better point would be that homosexuality, pornography, and abortion are great at harming religion.


87 posted on 08/06/2010 5:57:17 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Buy another property in New Zealand...

I think I have to pay the 2/3 before I can buy the property in New Zealand.


88 posted on 08/06/2010 9:16:08 PM PDT by Chickensoup (I am absolutely done. I am a conservative libertarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

If bread is a metaphor for food, I agree. Being gluten
intolerant, I don’t eat bread. It doesn’t figure into
my food bill at all.


89 posted on 08/06/2010 9:52:48 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

well shoot. looking back at the whole wrangle with southack, which he eventually seemed to give up. i said inflation, he said deflation.

It does seem that prices are more calm, if not lower, than during their jumpiness during the oil run-ups of the Bush years (and Bush was not to blame for them). Back then all were saying that energy was the lion’s share of these higher prices.

Now we have a huge borrow, a huge unleashing of heaven knows how many of the borrowed dollars, some busted bubbles. And a stock market that went frantic to go back up not long after Obama took the oath.

God knows. It’s like a ball of yarn that two cats are pulling at the opposite ends of. Prices may be equivocating just because nobody can guess what the Bummer will do next week.


90 posted on 08/06/2010 10:04:53 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: onyx
In 1913 five dollars could get you the following:

15 pounds of potatoes, 10 pounds of flour, 5 pounds of sugar, 5 pounds of chuck roast, 3 pounds of round steak, 3 pounds of rice, 2 pounds each of cheese and bacon, and a pound each of butter and coffee... two loaves of bread, 4 quarts of milk and a dozen eggs.

Then 5 dollars was nearly a quarter ounce of gold. Today, a quarter ounce of gold is near $300.00. Could you buy this for $300?

91 posted on 08/06/2010 10:17:11 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin (A trillion here, a trillion there, soon you're NOT talking real money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

My Jack Russell/Rat Terrier puppy has a different
way to deal with a skein of yarn. I call it “whole
house knitting’. He runs around the furniture in
the livingroom and dining room with the skein in
his mouth. To undo it, you have to trace the
original path while winding it back up. My wife
has to keep her yarn in a locked box to prevent
his creative behavior.


92 posted on 08/07/2010 8:44:04 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: onyx
It is very difficult for politicians to run large deficits if the currency is anchored in something intrinsically real and valuable -- let's say gold. This is because when they post large budget shortfalls under a gold standard, people naturally ask them, "Where in the world are you going to get all the gold to pay for all this spending?" And since politicians do not know how to make gold, they are forced to admit: "We are going to get it from you, the people, of course. Where else could it come from?"

As you can imagine, such answers do not usually go well with the voting public.

Great post ...

93 posted on 08/07/2010 8:53:27 AM PDT by GOPJ (Asked for ZIP? Give 82224 - Lost Springs,Wy - most sparsely populated in country. Freeper:SamAdams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
15 pounds of potatoes, 10 pounds of flour, 5 pounds of sugar, 5 pounds of chuck roast, 3 pounds of round steak, 3 pounds of rice, 2 pounds each of cheese and bacon, and a pound each of butter and coffee... two loaves of bread, 4 quarts of milk and a dozen eggs.

Then 5 dollars was nearly a quarter ounce of gold. Today, a quarter ounce of gold is near $300.00. Could you buy this for $300?

Well, using the handy price checker feature at Albertsons.com (here), here's what I come up with:

Item Price per item Cost
15 lbs potatoes $3.99 / 5 lbs $11.97
10 lbs flour $2.49 / 5 lbs $4.98
5 lbs sugar $3.59 / 5 lbs $3.59
5 lbs chuck roast $5.49 / 1 lb boneless chuck $27.45
3 lbs round steak $5.99 / 1 lb chuck steak (no round listed) $17.97
3 lbs rice $1.89 / 1 lb long grain rice $5.67
2 lbs cheese $5.49 / 1 lb cheddar cheese $10.98
2 lbs bacon $4.49 / 1 lb bacon $8.98
1 lb butter $3.49 / 1 lb butter $3.49
1 lb coffee $8.59 / 1 lb coffee $8.59
2 loaves bread $2.89 / 1 loaf $5.78
4 quarts milk $3.99 / gallon $3.99
1 dozen eggs $2.69 / dozen $2.69
TOTAL $116.13

94 posted on 08/07/2010 9:31:15 AM PDT by snowsislander (In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister
Sorry to be off topic, but are you aware of what’s been going on over on Polarik’s thread?

Thanks for the heads up. I've read a few of the comments...

95 posted on 08/07/2010 1:11:38 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
Thank you. So, if you had a 1913 $5 gold piece, and sold it for scrap gold value today, you could buy nearly three times as much in groceries as you could in 1913. Very interesting.

Indian Half Eagle 1908-1929 $290.96

Gold Coin Value Guide

96 posted on 08/07/2010 1:34:09 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin (A trillion here, a trillion there, soon you're NOT talking real money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Thank you. So, if you had a 1913 $5 gold piece, and sold it for scrap gold value today, you could buy nearly three times as much in groceries as you could in 1913. Very interesting.

You are welcome.

As to the factor of three increase in buying power from 1913, the answer is yes, it does seem to exist. I would attribute much of that increase to our far greater efficiency in production for commodity items.

For what it is worth, I used typical prices from a standard grocer. I have no doubt that virtually of those items could be bought for less by shopping discounters and member clubs such as Costco, further increasing that factor.

97 posted on 08/07/2010 1:56:03 PM PDT by snowsislander (In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I have an offer to sell my property and am forced by the feds to buy another or have 2/3 of the value elimated by taxes. What to do?

Buy another property in New Zealand...

,,, how about registering a charity, based in the Marshall Islands, which you just happen to control? Gift the property to the charity. That sort of Ford Foundation thinking is probably why Ford is the only US car manufacturer not needing a bailout. The system uses you; you have to know how to use it.

98 posted on 09/09/2010 4:16:14 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson