Stop right there! The author proceeds to compare the experimental methodologies of medicine et al. with physics. Uh uh. Sorry bub. It's not like you are proceeding in some parallel realm to physics composed somehow of fuzzy unknown blobs. Physics is the science of this world, and if you would be scientific, you must ground your findings in physics, through chemistry. Emulating its methods will not do.
I ask myself this: What would happen if we saw UFO’s all the time. Huge ones would graze over cities, formations would do fun tricks, etc., yet we could only see them. We could not sense them with any electronic device, we could not touch them, with ANYTHING, no matter what we did or what technology was at our disposal.
And we have lived with their presence for the entire history of man.
We would just “accept” them. They would be a topic of discussion from time to time, but “science” would, for the most part, ignore their presence. And if someone started talking of the possibility of their being created by intelligent beings, science may just try to say they are just something that evolved that we don’t yet understand.
Well, there is something like that that we have all experienced every single day of our lives. All people KNOW it exists, nobody can explain it from a natural perspective, yet science ignores it as a possible proof of the intelligent (read that divine) creation of man. Frankly, science has very little to say about it other than wild speculation.
I am speaking of human consciousness.
Outcomes are predetermined before studies ever begin and the unaccounted variables are almost always the most significant aspect of whatever is being “studied”.
Social science has become nothing more than the precise statistical compilation of extremely subjective data points.
The question to be asked is ...Is there really social science?
It is made up from thin air and exists to propagate political schemes. there is no social science
btt