Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
A physicist ...

Stop right there! The author proceeds to compare the experimental methodologies of medicine et al. with physics. Uh uh. Sorry bub. It's not like you are proceeding in some parallel realm to physics composed somehow of fuzzy unknown blobs. Physics is the science of this world, and if you would be scientific, you must ground your findings in physics, through chemistry. Emulating its methods will not do.

2 posted on 08/02/2010 10:21:33 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dr_lew
Stop right there! The author proceeds to compare the experimental methodologies of medicine et al. with physics. Uh uh. Sorry bub. It's not like you are proceeding in some parallel realm to physics composed somehow of fuzzy unknown blobs. Physics is the science of this world, and if you would be scientific, you must ground your findings in physics, through chemistry.

You don't think that they are working through their clinical trials' findings with explanations in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and epigenetics? Isn't it called the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine?

4 posted on 08/02/2010 11:30:02 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dr_lew

Did you read the article?

The author sheds interesting and valuable insight into the limitations of the “scientific method” and regression analysis in understanding of the human condition. It is certainly worth reading.


14 posted on 08/03/2010 11:37:22 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson