Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Electric aircraft generates buzz at Oshkosh air show
Chicago Tribune ^ | 8-2-10 | Jon Hilkevitch

Posted on 08/02/2010 10:28:01 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic

Boeing working on hybrid plane to cut fuel use, noise, emissions

OSHKOSH, Wis. — An electric airliner?

Imagine a hyper-efficient aircraft as large as a Boeing 737, although weighing much less. It would run quieter and cleaner than any other commercial plane ever made, requiring two-thirds less energy, according to NASA-funded research.

The hybrid-powered jetliner of the future would operate on batteries or jet fuel, depending on whether it's cruising or taking off and climbing, when the most thrust is required.

The concept of electric aircraft generated a resounding buzz amid the drone of pistons and the roar of gas turbine jet engines at the Experimental Aircraft Association's annual AirVenture air show, which wrapped up Sunday at Wittman Regional Airport in Oshkosh.

Chicago-based Boeing is working on a concept plane called the SUGAR Volt that would use turbine engines and electric motors connected to the fans to more efficiently propel the electric airliner. On flights of up to 900 miles, the SUGAR Volt would cruise almost exclusively on battery power, said Marty Bradley, a technical fellow at Boeing's research and technology division in Huntington Beach, Calif.

An electric propulsion system would help slash the amount of fuel burned as well as noise around airports by about 70 percent compared with today's airliner fleet, say aerospace researchers who believe they can have such a flying machine up and running by about 2035.

~snip~

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Miscellaneous; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: dolt; eaa; electricity; energy; environment; oshkosh; sugartit; volt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Boeing's SUGAR Volt concept plane would run on gas and electricity. (Image courtesy of Boeing / July 28, 2010)

1 posted on 08/02/2010 10:28:03 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Boeing’s SUGAR Volt concept plane would run on gas and electricity ...and unicorn farts.


2 posted on 08/02/2010 10:32:47 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
The hybrid-powered jetliner of the future would operate on batteries or jet fuel...

I though jetliners presently operate on batteries and jet fuel....

3 posted on 08/02/2010 10:33:49 AM PDT by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Give ma a ticket on a real Jetliner.


4 posted on 08/02/2010 10:35:05 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

ma = me


5 posted on 08/02/2010 10:35:37 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
I'd like to see them pull this wingspan monster into an ATL airport gate.....IF this even could fly, you're talking about expanding gate size by 50% or more all over the world.....these people just don't think anymore.

This is what I call a PDOOMA .....pulled directly out of my........

6 posted on 08/02/2010 10:38:10 AM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Maybe they can put some solar panels on the wings and wind turbines on the top of the fuselage! That would be really coool and sooo green!


7 posted on 08/02/2010 10:39:06 AM PDT by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Boy oh boy, I’ll bet that sucker will hit oh...maybe 110 MPH!

Just think of it!!!


8 posted on 08/02/2010 10:39:10 AM PDT by texmexis best (My)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

Don’t like it when they use an acronym, and not define it.
Had to look up what SUGAR stood for, it’s Subsonic Ultra Green
Aircraft Research. (you’re welcome)


9 posted on 08/02/2010 10:43:10 AM PDT by Ed Condon (Give 'em a heading, an altitude, and a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best

After you add the time, cost, and inconvenience of traveling to an airport and going through the security clowns, 110 mph seems not even worth it. They’d have to pay ME to fly.


10 posted on 08/02/2010 10:51:10 AM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
On a smaller scale, a competition is under way to develop by next year a personal commuter aircraft that operates on electricity or fuel cells and can average at least 100 mph on a 200-mile flight while achieving greater than 200 passenger mpg. The Green Flight Challenge, sponsored by NASA and the CAFE Foundation, offers a $1.5 million first prize for the aircraft with the best performance.

A 100mph airliner?

11 posted on 08/02/2010 11:02:02 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I will bet its a doable project they need to get the GE & Prat Whitney on-board though to integrate the propulsion systems.


12 posted on 08/02/2010 11:02:29 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

With the DC power the batteries would have to store it would take weeks to charge and to charge the fleet would blow every power line in the US.


13 posted on 08/02/2010 11:05:33 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
The more important question is how many taxpayers per gallon will it be?
14 posted on 08/02/2010 11:07:20 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Liberals don’t “think” about ANY issue beyond -

“now I feel good about myself for being on this side of this issue”.


15 posted on 08/02/2010 11:10:01 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I had no idea that full sized electric was being taken so seriously. I fly RC electric as I’m sure many other Freepers do. The first application would be for commuter airports. Wingspan size is no object. I fly into Coos Bay Oregon on occasion and 100 MPH with someone else driving would be comfortable and desirable.


16 posted on 08/02/2010 11:11:23 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

“This is your Captain speaking. We do have a minor in-flight emergency. Would you all please give every battery you have to the flight attendants going through the cabin with the white plastic bags? Please? Please. PLEASE, WOULD YOU HURRY
IT UP!”


17 posted on 08/02/2010 11:13:41 AM PDT by righttackle44 (I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I’m surprised there aren’t any solar cells on the thousands of square feet of wing area.


18 posted on 08/02/2010 11:20:20 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
The more important question is how many taxpayers per gallon will it be?

LOL. That is the post of the day. Sarcastic truth will win the war against the totalitarian left.
19 posted on 08/02/2010 11:24:36 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media. There are Wars and Rumors of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
It gives the Blue Screen of Death a WHOLE new meaning.


20 posted on 08/02/2010 11:25:26 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson