Posted on 07/27/2010 1:20:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Of all the recent revelations to come out of JournoList, an e-mail list consisting of about 400 liberal/left journalists, perhaps the most telling is the depth of their hatred for conservatives. That these journalists would consult with one another in order to protect candidate and then President Obama and in order to hurt Republicans is unfortunate and ugly. What is jolting is the hatred of conservatives on display, as exemplified by the e-mail from a public-radio reporter expressing her wish to personally see Rush Limbaugh die a painful death — and the apparent absence of any objection from her fellow liberal journalists.
Every one of us on the right has seen this hatred. I am not referring to leftist bloggers or to anonymous comments by angry leftists on conservative blogs — such things exist on the right as well — but to mainstream, elite liberal journalists. There is simply nothing analogous among elite conservative journalists. Yes, nearly all conservatives believe that the Left is leading America to ruin. But while there is plenty of conservative anger over this fact, there is little or nothing on the right to match the Left’s hatred of conservative individuals. Would mainstream conservative journalists e-mail one another wishes that they could be present while Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi or Michael Moore died slowly and painfully of a heart attack?
From Karl Marx to today, the Left has always hated people of the Right, not merely differed or been angry with them. The question is, why?
Here are three possible answers.
First, the Left thinks the Right is evil. Granting the exceptions that all generalizations allow for, conservatives believe that those on the left are wrong, while those on the left believe that those on the right are bad. Examples are innumerable. Howard Dean, the former head of the Democratic party, said, “In contradistinction to the Republicans, Democrats don’t believe kids ought to go to bed hungry at night.” Rep. Alan Grayson (D., Fla.), among many similar comments, said, “I want to say a few words about what it means to be a Democrat. It’s very simple: We have a conscience.”
Has any spokesman of the Republican party ever said anything analogous about Democrats’ not caring about the suffering of children or not having a conscience?
Second, when you don’t confront real evil, you hate those who do. You can see this on almost any school playground. The kid who confronts the school bully is often resented more than the bully. Whether out of guilt over their own cowardice or out of fear that the one who confronted the bully will provoke the bully to lash out more, those who refuse to confront the bully often resent the one who does. During the 1980s, the Left expressed far more hatred for Ronald Reagan than for Soviet Communist dictator Leonid Brezhnev. When Reagan labeled the Soviet Union an “evil empire,” the liberal world was enraged . . . at Reagan.
Those (usually on the left) who refused to confront Communism hated those (usually on the right) who did. They called the latter “warmongers” and “cold warriors” and charged them with having “missile envy” and with loving war.
Today, the Left has similar contempt for those who take a hard line on Islamic terror. The liberal and leftist media routinely place quote marks around the words “War on Terror.” To the Left, such a war is manufactured by rightists for nefarious reasons — oil, self-enrichment, imperialism, etc. Indeed, the Obama administration declines to use the term “Islamic terror.” America is at war with a nameless enemy. The enemies this administration is prepared to name are the Republican party, the tea parties, Fox News, and talk radio.
Third, the Left’s utopian vision is prevented only by the Right.
From its inception, leftism has been a secular utopian religion. As Ted Kennedy, paraphrasing his brother Robert F. Kennedy, said, “Some men see things as they are and say, Why? I dream things that never were and say, Why not?” That exemplifies left-wing idealism — imagining a utopian future. There will be no poor, no war, no conflict, no inequality. That future is only a few more government programs away from reality. And who stands in the way of such perfection? Conservatives. How could a utopian not hate a conservative?
This hatred will only increase if the Left feels its programs to greatly increase the size of government are in any way threatened in the forthcoming elections. The problem is that this hatred does not decrease when the Left is in power.
Hatred of conservatives is so much a part of the Left that the day the Left stops hating conservatives will mark the beginning of the end of the Left as we know it.
But, for the life of me (probably literally), I can't figure out why we put them in control(?)
It’s self-hatred - at it’s root.
They hate “individualism”. They have a hive mentality..................
They’re terribly insecure individuals. Self-haters with a tendency towards fat, dumb . . . and ugly.
I always find it amusing when the left uses the term “evil”. I, and most likely they, have no clue what they are talking about. If you don’t believe me, ask them their definition of evil. You will find out anything that prevents them from getting what they want right now is evil. Pretty concise philosophy don’t you think? Most of us grew out of such a petty worldview by the time we were potty trained. Leftists, not so much.
bttt
They’re just serving their “father”.
He hates God’s creation, and especially hates those created in the image of God.
Nothing pleases him more than to degrade God in effigy.
Isaiah 5:20
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.
Maybe we believed this before this radical leftist ascended to the throne. But now, I truly believe (and would suspect many here would agree) that these people are evil. Not just wrong. But evil. Satan himself manifested through them. No question about it.
Evil is also any opposition to some policy which, by supporting it, makes them feel good about themselves.
Eveyone thinks they're "more compasionate". (See #1)
Yes, Satan likes to twist around backwards anything that God created.
That’s why homos should marry, but women should not marry men. Boys should be feminized, girls masculinized.
We could go on all day of the perversions that Satan and his leftist minions support.
This idea holds an irresistible attraction for intellectuals because it elevates them from the position of passive observers of life into its shapers. Their superior knowledge of what is rational and virtuous permits them to aspire to the status of mankinds 'educators.' While ordinary people, in pursuit of a living, acquire specific knowledge relevant to their particular occupation, intellectuals - and they alone - claim to know things 'in general.' By creating 'sciences' of human affairs - economic science, political science, sociology - they feel at liberty to dismiss as irrelevant practices and institutions created over millennia by brial and error. It is this philosophical revolution that has transformed some intellectuals into intelligentsia, actively involved in politics. And, of course, involvement in politics makes them politicians, and, like others of the breed, prone to pursue their private interests in the guise of working for the common good.
Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, pg 22-23.
(A great concise read on the evils of Bolshevism, if anyone is so inclined to read up on such).
I’ve never known a happy liberal. They want others to suffer because misery loves company.
It is the Freudian desire to return to the womb—of the collective.
Thanks, I’ll have to find the time to read that - long article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.