Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Atlas Shrugged’ Producer Sets Record Straight On Upcoming Trilogy
bighollywood.breitbart.com ^ | July 20, 2010 | John Nolte

Posted on 07/22/2010 12:03:31 PM PDT by grundle

Yes, there will be an “Atlas Shrugged” movie. Well, at least a part one.

”The movie is based on Part 1 of the book (the book has 3 parts) … so the film is based on about 27% of the book.”

This is the first I’ve heard that this production is only the first of three films, and while I haven’t read ”Atlas Shrugged,” those who have tell me a trilogy is the perfect way to tell the story on screen. Like “Lord of the Rings,” the natural breaks in Rand’s novel practically demand it be told in three parts, and a single feature film, even a long one with a hefty studio budget behind it, would almost certainly short-change the novel’s legion of faithful fans who, regardless of budget, are most concerned about seeing an adaptation that doesn’t compromise Rand’s philosophy. To that end, Kaslow assures the Randians:

“The movie is a direct ‘adaptation’ of the book included using much of the dialogue written by Ayn Rand.”

Kaslow told me, “The talent cast in the movie was selected on the basis of the director’s and producers’ belief in their acting skills without taking on the ‘distractions’ often associated with ‘A-List” talent.’”

In any case, like “Harry Potter” and the “Narnia” films, the real star here is the project itself, Ayn Rand, and Objectivism. If the performances rise to the occasion no one’s going to care that there’s no familiar name above the title.

As of now the plan is to release part one of “Atlas Shrugged” in theatres sometime during the second quarter of 2011 and start production on the second part the following fall.

(Excerpt) Read more at bighollywood.breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: atlasshrugged; aynrand; hollywood; objectivism; whoisjohngalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

1 posted on 07/22/2010 12:03:34 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

Someone should turn it into a cable miniseries - like Pillars of the Earth or John Adams. We never go to movies any more; watching them on cable at home is so much better!


2 posted on 07/22/2010 12:06:25 PM PDT by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle; Publius

A trilogy? I do hope they cut the long speech by Galt at the end. If you hadn’t figured out the theme of the novel by then......


3 posted on 07/22/2010 12:07:21 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meowmeow

How about an ANTHEM movie with the sound track by RUSH?


4 posted on 07/22/2010 12:07:44 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

If it’s like the 1940s Fountainhead movie it ought to at least be good for a few laughs. If that woman’s atheistic nonsense is the best argument for capitalism, I’ll line up with the socialists.


5 posted on 07/22/2010 12:08:26 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I hope they get this right. Rand’s genius was not really her philosophy, it was her understanding of what motivates the statists. The characters in Atlas Shrugged seem a little too real these days.


6 posted on 07/22/2010 12:09:32 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges; DollyCali
ping

Who are these people who making this movie???

7 posted on 07/22/2010 12:10:35 PM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“...and while I haven’t read ”Atlas Shrugged,...”

Probably should, if you’re going to write an article on it. Every American should read it as well, because it is in the process of transitioning from fiction to prophecy.


8 posted on 07/22/2010 12:10:41 PM PDT by Flightdeck (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Who is John Galt?


9 posted on 07/22/2010 12:10:57 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
I do hope they cut the long speech by Galt at the end.

I think Parts 2 and 3 of the trilogy are the speech.

Just kidding!

10 posted on 07/22/2010 12:11:55 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

LOL! Imagine those two films.....


11 posted on 07/22/2010 12:12:57 PM PDT by FourPeas (God Save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Ack!!


12 posted on 07/22/2010 12:14:51 PM PDT by constitutiongirl ("Nietzsche was stupid and abnormal."---Leo Tolstoy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I thought the book would have been better without the speech. We had already heard the speech given by others, and the plot had delivered it much better. Bleah. Why summarize in a speech what you just spent 800 pages telling me anyway?


13 posted on 07/22/2010 12:15:23 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas; ClearCase_guy

The second one will just be a short deterioration bridge to the finale....a short teaser that everyone whines about, like Empire Strikes Back.


14 posted on 07/22/2010 12:16:51 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Her atheism is the weakness in the book and in her outlook.


15 posted on 07/22/2010 12:17:14 PM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Rand’s aesthetics were of secondary importance to her sexual politics in informing her political philosophy. Her heroines are sui generis women who are inevitably ravished, and the sexual tension between the male and female protagonists is what motivates their philosophical positions.


16 posted on 07/22/2010 12:17:14 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

haha! Hilarious. I just got done reading that book a month ago. Great concept but waaay too long and repetitive and preachy. At the end I was feeling like “Enough already! I get it!”


17 posted on 07/22/2010 12:18:15 PM PDT by MNDude (Ask the Native American's how their "Open Borders" policy worked out for them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
I'm having a nauseous vision of a sweaty, manic Sean Penn 3 hour long screech-a-palooza in which Galt’s speech will morph into a giant statist love fest with an Orwellian 10 minutes of hate at the end directed toward Tea Party participants.
18 posted on 07/22/2010 12:18:34 PM PDT by constitutiongirl ("Nietzsche was stupid and abnormal."---Leo Tolstoy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Finished reading it a while ago. Had to remind myself I was reading a book, and not the newspaper.


19 posted on 07/22/2010 12:19:32 PM PDT by Nashvegas (What do you get if you offer a liberal a penny for their thoughts? Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

The speech will be Part III................


20 posted on 07/22/2010 12:19:33 PM PDT by Red Badger (No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him on speed dial...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson