Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Contentious Kagan Nomination Approved by Judiciary; Democrats Attack Chief Justice Roberts
Citizen Link ^ | 07/20/10 | Catherine Snow

Posted on 07/21/2010 4:31:18 AM PDT by IbJensen

‘It’s clear that Elena Kagan will rubber-stamp President Obama’s massive expansions in federal power and entrench the Left’s agenda on issues like same-sex marriage, so it’s no surprise that Democrats on the committee have rubber-stamped her nomination.’

The Senate Judiciary Committee today favorably voted out of committee Elena Kagan – President Obama’s nominee for associate justice for the U.S. Supreme Court.

The 13-6 vote fell along party lines, except for Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who sided with the Democrat majority.

Graham – who is not up for re-election until 2015 – justified his vote by essentially saying elections have consequences.

“President Obama won,” he said. “I’ve got a lot of opportunity to disagree with him, but the Constitution in my view puts a requirement on me as a senator to not replace my judgment for his — not to think of the 100 reasons I would pick somebody differently or pick a fight with Ms. Kagan.”

He was also the lone Republican to vote in favor of now-Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

Kagan’s nomination now goes to the full Senate. To date, 41 senators have declared how they plan to vote – 25 Democrats will vote in favor and 16 Republicans will oppose her nomination.

As is customary, senators are allowed the opportunity to state for the record the reasoning behind their decision before a formal committee vote is taken. Several Democrat committee members departed from protocol and chose to strike out against Chief Justice John Roberts –degrading him as a “judicial activist.”

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the committee pushed back against the Democrats’ potshots by bringing into focus Obama’s nomination track record.

“He looks for judges who will allow their vision for what American should be to influence how they make decisions about the law and the facts of the case before them,” said Sessions. “To me, that’s not law, not in the American tradition of law. That’s politics.”

The Roberts court, many would argue, has proven to be more centrist and the chief justice’s leadership style pragmatic. Cases are routinely – and narrowly – decided depending on the subject.

The Wall Street Journal recounts that, “In the 2006 term, some 70 percent of the Court’s cases were decided unanimously, and this term saw 56 percent of the cases decided either unanimously or by an 8-1 margin.”

Ed Whelan, constitutional attorney and president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center said Senate Democrats are masterful at the art of distraction.

“It’s clear that Elena Kagan will rubber-stamp President Obama’s massive expansions in federal power and entrench the Left’s agenda on issues like same-sex marriage, so it’s no surprise that Democrats on the committee have rubber-stamped her nomination,” said Whelan.

“American citizens deserve justices who will enforce the rights and limits on governmental power that are in the Constitution and who won’t invent rights that aren’t in the Constitution. American citizens deserve better than Elena Kagan.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; bhoscotus; kagan; lesbian; sweathog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
American citizens deserve better than Elena Kagan.

Right. Besides, the lovely Elena should be latching on to a handsome husband and raising a family. She'll have to donate her inventory of Snap-On-Tools to charity. (Hillary has volunteered to take them.)

What is it with these Progressive (Communist) women? Not a head-turner in the pack.

1 posted on 07/21/2010 4:31:21 AM PDT by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
"Graham .....justified his vote by essentially saying elections have consequences. "

The reelection of this JUANnabie has certainly shown that point to be true.

2 posted on 07/21/2010 4:36:46 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
"Graham – who is not up for re-election until 2015"

2015? Sure hope he tells his supporters to be sure and get out and vote for him in 2015 in the Republican primary!

3 posted on 07/21/2010 4:37:07 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
"Snap-On-Tools"

Don't you mean Strap-On-Tools?

4 posted on 07/21/2010 4:37:53 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
“It’s clear that Elena Kagan will rubber-stamp President Obama’s massive expansions in federal power and entrench the Left’s agenda on issues like same-sex marriage, so it’s no surprise that Democrats on the committee have rubber-stamped her nomination,”

And Graham.

5 posted on 07/21/2010 4:38:16 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Not a head-turner in the pack.

I beg to differ, but not how you might think. LOL.


6 posted on 07/21/2010 4:39:30 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
“President Obama won,” he said. “I’ve got a lot of opportunity to disagree with him, but the Constitution in my view puts a requirement on me as a senator to not replace my judgment for his — not to think of the 100 reasons I would pick somebody differently or pick a fight with Ms. Kagan.”

OMG! Graham IS a moron. If what he says were true, we'd be electing kings.

7 posted on 07/21/2010 4:41:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Graham should be kicked out of the Republican party.


8 posted on 07/21/2010 4:44:16 AM PDT by Durus (The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

If Graham had voted no Kagans nomination would be stalled in committee. That SOB has unleashed this communist onto the Constitution. A curse upon Graham and all that support him!


9 posted on 07/21/2010 4:49:11 AM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
"Graham .....justified his vote by essentially saying elections have consequences."

And "Votes Have Consequences" should be our war cry in response.

10 posted on 07/21/2010 4:55:54 AM PDT by VRWCtaz (America has Zero to be ashamed of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

He is a disgusting example of a true traitor, but he’s one that sleeps soundly bedded down at night with his Democrat pals.


11 posted on 07/21/2010 5:01:29 AM PDT by IbJensen ((Ps 109.8): "Let his days be few; and let another take his position.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The tools snap on the belt. Ask Hillary, she knows.


12 posted on 07/21/2010 5:03:25 AM PDT by IbJensen ((Ps 109.8): "Let his days be few; and let another take his position.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Graham is a quintessential elitist. He is incapable of understanding Constitutional, conservative principle. Graham’s adherence to the elitist agenda allows this intellectual light weight to know where to stand on any given issue without the burden of thinking about or understanding anything. He is a cutout doll, nothing more.


13 posted on 07/21/2010 5:05:12 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (He is the son of soulless slavers, not the son of soulful slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

It’s refreshing to know that the industry has matured to the state of having hardpoint mounting standards.


14 posted on 07/21/2010 5:08:47 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

I am still absolutely stunned by his statement. Under his premise, Bam gets anything he wants because he “won”. What does this nitwit think Congress is there for? He needs some lessons on balance of power. He’s there as a “check” on the President and not to rubberstamp his agenda.


15 posted on 07/21/2010 5:10:26 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

South Carolina Dems will probably run a tree stump against Graham next time. He serves them well.


16 posted on 07/21/2010 5:13:57 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

He definitely has forgotten that he’s from South Carolina. What a Beltway Boob.


17 posted on 07/21/2010 5:14:26 AM PDT by tgusa (Investment plan: blued steel, brass, lead, copper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Durus

“Graham should be kicked out of the Republican party.”

Well, that and he sure needs to be kicked out of South Carolina...He is such an embarrassment to a fine southern state.
By 2015, he will be a billionaire, and probably be a top member of the politburo.


18 posted on 07/21/2010 5:18:08 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Can you imagine what the dems have on Linseed. His FBI file must be quite an eye opener.


19 posted on 07/21/2010 5:20:08 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
If SC has a republican governer why can't grahmnesty just die and get it over with? He's obviously an enemy of the Constitution.

The senate is given the duty to advise and consent to supreme court nominations. If they do not consent then the president needs to find someone else. Why is grahmnesty avoiding fulfilling his oath to defend the Constitution?

God, I pray that the democrats (and democrats in drag like grahmnesty) would just start dying in mass. The world would be a much better place in no time.

20 posted on 07/21/2010 5:23:10 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson