Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Su-34 frontline bombers proved their superior operational capabilities and flight performance
Defense Professionals ^ | 7/20/2010 | Defense Professionals

Posted on 07/20/2010 9:34:11 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The Russian Air Force’s in-service Su-34s designed by the Sukhoi Company have proved their superior operational capabilities and flight performance in the East-2010 military exercises held in July. In performance of the operational mission a non-stop flight was carried out from the European part of Russia to the Far East with in-flight refueling and subsequent attack as per task assigned. Soon it is planned to increase the operational capability of the aircraft by adding new aerial munitions, announced the Director General of Sukhoi Mikhail Pogosyan today at the press conference at the Farnborough International Airshow-2010.

The Su-34 frontline bomber will form the core of Russia's front-line air strike capability, and is a worthy successor to the Su-24M all-weather, day and night-time frontline bomber. Serial production of the Su-34 has been set up at the Chkalov Aviation Production Association in Novosibirsk, which is a part of the Sukhoi holding company. In 2008 a five-year contract was signed with the government to supply the Russian Defense Ministry with 32 serial-production aircraft. In time, the Su-34 will replace virtually the entire fleet of Su-24 frontline bombers that are currently in service.

The Su-34 can effectively attack land-based, sea- and airborne targets by day and night in all weathers using the entire suite of its airborne munitions, including high-precision types. In terms of operational capabilities this is a 4+ aircraft. Its active safety system, along with the newest computers, provides extra capabilities for the pilot and navigator to perform aimed bombing and to maneuver under enemy fire. The excellent aerodynamics, large capacity internal fuel tanks, fuel-efficient bypass engines with a digital control system, in-flight refueling device and add-on fuel tanks enable the aircraft to fly long distances close to those of medium strategic bombers.

(Excerpt) Read more at defpro.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; russia; russianairforce; su34; sukhoi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2010 9:34:14 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Sweet looking jet.

2 posted on 07/20/2010 9:46:56 PM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

I like the design


3 posted on 07/20/2010 9:54:20 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968; ...

Ping


4 posted on 07/20/2010 9:54:48 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

What’s house in the Su-34’s beaver tail?


5 posted on 07/20/2010 10:02:24 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

It has a large flight deck.Much of the design work went into crew comfort. The two crew members sit side by side in a large cabin.The crew members have room to stand and move about the cabin during long missions


6 posted on 07/20/2010 10:05:17 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

It has a small toilet that is located behind the crew seats


7 posted on 07/20/2010 10:06:30 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Sharon Stone?


8 posted on 07/20/2010 10:09:55 PM PDT by garyhope (It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam and illegal immigration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

For once they didn’t steal the design from us.

It is pretty sleek. But I suspect it can’t delver the ordinance the photo depicts. There is no place to put it. The little rear-protruding pod doesn’t look like it can house them all.

This might be a good fighter but as a bomber? Meh.

More propaganda than ability IMHO.


9 posted on 07/20/2010 10:43:35 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

ping


10 posted on 07/20/2010 10:45:35 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 542 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

IIRC, the Fullback is based on the Flanker platform. Which is a pretty good base to start from since the Su-27/30 is (IMHO) the single best fighter design ever to come out of the former Soviet Union.


11 posted on 07/20/2010 10:59:30 PM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! SERPENTINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
[ It has a small toilet that is located behind the crew seats ]

Probably to handle problems when thoughts that an F-22 might in the area..

12 posted on 07/20/2010 11:03:50 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
But I suspect it can’t delver the ordinance the photo depicts. There is no place to put it.

Per Wikipedia, "The Su-34 has 12 pylons for up to 8,000 kilograms (17,635 lb) of ordnance". So I guess most of it is external.

The little rear-protruding pod doesn’t look like it can house them all.

The pod can be anything from an external (refillable in flight) fuel tank to an EW or a FLIR/laser unit, or something else. I'd think it highly unlikely to ever contain ordnance, just on mechanical grounds. But an EW pod is nearly certain, at least according to www.ausairpower.net.

13 posted on 07/20/2010 11:10:46 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Greysard

That protrusion is pretty bizarre but probably has a practical purpose. Let’s face it, the Soyuz ain’t very pretty but has proven itself as a useful craft that has outlasted our efforts.

But, again IMHO, 17K doesn’t make it a bomber, just and run of the mill A/F.


14 posted on 07/20/2010 11:21:41 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

I think its a really good design.


15 posted on 07/20/2010 11:39:43 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
That protrusion is pretty bizarre but probably has a practical purpose.

Pods are extremely practical because they allow you to add a new capability to any pod-compatible aircraft in minutes.

This particular configuration places one pod into the aerodynamic shadow of the cockpit and under the less reflecting skin of the aircraft. The fact that the pod is longer than the wing surface is not a problem; in fact it's an advantage that was discovered a century ago when people tried to stabilize bullets - see the boat-tail design here.

16 posted on 07/20/2010 11:50:49 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
That protrusion is pretty bizarre but probably has a practical purpose.

Rear-looking radar.

17 posted on 07/21/2010 12:14:55 AM PDT by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
That protrusion is pretty bizarre but probably has a practical purpose.

Rear-looking radar.

THAT explains so much with my ex-wife!!!

18 posted on 07/21/2010 12:29:37 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

LOL


19 posted on 07/21/2010 12:32:17 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003; Greysard

The tail protrusion on the plane could be the plane’s secondary radar system. The Fullback has a rear-facing tracking/targeting radar allowing it to launch its air-to-air missiles at pursuing aircraft.


20 posted on 07/21/2010 12:45:43 AM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! SERPENTINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson