Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SZonian

For once they didn’t steal the design from us.

It is pretty sleek. But I suspect it can’t delver the ordinance the photo depicts. There is no place to put it. The little rear-protruding pod doesn’t look like it can house them all.

This might be a good fighter but as a bomber? Meh.

More propaganda than ability IMHO.


9 posted on 07/20/2010 10:43:35 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who accepts a ride from a scorpion should expect a sting and the phrase "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003
But I suspect it can’t delver the ordinance the photo depicts. There is no place to put it.

Per Wikipedia, "The Su-34 has 12 pylons for up to 8,000 kilograms (17,635 lb) of ordnance". So I guess most of it is external.

The little rear-protruding pod doesn’t look like it can house them all.

The pod can be anything from an external (refillable in flight) fuel tank to an EW or a FLIR/laser unit, or something else. I'd think it highly unlikely to ever contain ordnance, just on mechanical grounds. But an EW pod is nearly certain, at least according to www.ausairpower.net.

13 posted on 07/20/2010 11:10:46 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

Of course it can deliver the weapons shown. The airframe is based on the Su-27 Flanker. The aircraft has under fuselage weapons points along with under wing points. Think of the weapons capability of the F-15E Strike Eagle.


24 posted on 08/03/2010 3:05:37 PM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson