Checked C-SPAN SCHEDULE - not sure they're carrying it live.
GO JD!
1 posted on
07/16/2010 5:35:43 PM PDT by
onyx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: onyx
In 2007, John gets final word on...
His and Ted Kennedy's...
Comprehensive Immigration Reform...
78 posted on
07/16/2010 6:51:21 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Latest most accurate Az Poll to date, of 14 likely voters: McCain 137%, Hayworth -37% (+/- 92%))
To: onyx
89 posted on
07/16/2010 6:57:50 PM PDT by
unkus
To: DoughtyOne; AuntB; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; bamahead; calcowgirl; Jim Robinson
It has begun. FUJM! GO JD GO!!!
To: onyx
www.DavidOsborne.net : ]
RE: Poll Question. I voted Immigration because we are talking about ARIZONA.. IMHO for ARIZONA it is 51% IMMIGRATION and 49% ECONOMY.. as for the USA as a whole it is 99.99% ECONOMY...
104 posted on
07/16/2010 7:05:43 PM PDT by
davidosborne
(I am SpartanSixDelta)
To: onyx
A first question intended to damage JD at the outset. Wonder if he’ll give McCain a loaded question?
106 posted on
07/16/2010 7:07:26 PM PDT by
Will88
To: onyx
Juan is nauseating talking about the border and amnesty. How anyone can take him seriously is beyond me.
158 posted on
07/16/2010 7:25:45 PM PDT by
Will88
To: onyx
Keep it commin’, only got FR and Twitter out here.
Note Deakinm is NOT the Tea Party Advocate. From the Arizonateaparty.ning.com poll- Hayworth 73.5%, Deakin 18.9% McCain 7.6%. Deakin followers on that site are no more that McCain propagandists and Jim Deakin himself will not call them on it. So screw Jim Deakin!
180 posted on
07/16/2010 7:31:42 PM PDT by
Old Flat Toad
(Pima County, home of the single vehicle accident with 40 victims.)
To: onyx
Deakin says ‘enforce existing laws’.
Isn’t that what the recent AZ bill (that most Dems oppose) calls for?
181 posted on
07/16/2010 7:32:01 PM PDT by
TomGuy
"My friends, I have a 5, 10, 20, 100 point plan"
"timetables"
"timetables!"
"TIMETABLES!!!"
190 posted on
07/16/2010 7:33:09 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: onyx
McCain on Social Security and Illegals in 2006 [more at link]:
from
On the Issues: John McCain on Immigration:
McCain voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security (2006)
- Once that person regularizes his or her status, and as they proceed down the path to earned citizenship, they should have the benefit after having followed the law and made those contributions. That is fairness.
- We should not steal their funds or empty their Social Security accounts. That is not fair. It does not reward their hard work or their financial contributions.
- The amendment proposes to change existing law to prohibit an individual from gaining the benefit of any contributions made while the individual was in an undocumented status. I oppose this amendment and believe it is wrong.
Reference: Preclusion of Social Security Credits; Bill S.Amdt.3985 to S.2611 ; vote number 2006-130 on May 18, 2006
199 posted on
07/16/2010 7:34:54 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: onyx
233 posted on
07/16/2010 7:44:24 PM PDT by
Danae
(If Liberals were only moderately insane, they would be tollerable. Alas, such is not the case.)
To: onyx
Secure the border is a canard.
It sounds good, but with definition of what 'secure' means, it is meaningless.
Case in point: the car bomb at the El Paso-Juarez bridge, which, so far, has gone unresponded to by the current Admin and politicians.
241 posted on
07/16/2010 7:46:39 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: onyx
Deakin sounds more conservative than McCain does.
Deakin’s Dem cohorts will not be happy about many of the things he has said and his allegations against the current Admin.
lol.
248 posted on
07/16/2010 7:48:19 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: onyx
This is a great format. No opportunity for the media to grandstand.
273 posted on
07/16/2010 7:54:52 PM PDT by
balls
(Every dictator needs an Internet kill switch.)
To: onyx
Zingers!
JD just collared McCain on tax cuts, said he voted for them, but McCain voted against them.
299 posted on
07/16/2010 8:01:01 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: onyx
McCain keeps going on about “I will lead....”
Well, why haven’t you BEEN leading in all those things you claim would WOULD lead on now?
319 posted on
07/16/2010 8:04:13 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: onyx
In the next debate, JD really needs to shoot down Juan’s nonsense about how he “leads” and point out the many results of some of his “leadership” and reaching across the aisle.
321 posted on
07/16/2010 8:04:19 PM PDT by
Will88
To: onyx
That was a good debate. Nationals should pay attention and try that format.
I hope many Arizonians watched.
336 posted on
07/16/2010 8:06:50 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: onyx
For anyone wanting to record it. CSPAN is now going to show it.
400 posted on
07/16/2010 8:32:47 PM PDT by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: onyx
I only heard one candidate mention Enumerated Powers. I only heard one candidate mention the Constitution. Two of the candidates have already been there and look where we are. I’m not from AZ, but I know who I would vote for.
Flame suit is on.
419 posted on
07/16/2010 8:41:35 PM PDT by
Jimma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson