Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Sends Obama Sweeping Wall Street Bill
AP via Yahoo ^ | 15 July 2010 | Jim Kuhnhenn

Posted on 07/15/2010 12:12:22 PM PDT by edpc

WASHINGTON – Congress sent legislation to President Barack Obama Thursday that imposes sweeping new regulations on Wall Street and creates new protections for millions of consumers.

The Senate's 60-39 vote came nearly two years after a financial crisis knocked the economy to its knees.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: business; congress; doddfrank; economy; finreg; frankdodd; obama; politcs; unfunnybandit; wallst
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: edpc

WEll, 308 million people have just had their ENTIRE financial life handed over to the Fed Res thru the Bureau established within the FEd Reserve to monitor, control, modify, punish, data collect and report with 10 advisors to be appointed within the Fed Reserve for all policy and enforcement and modification of financial behavior related to the COnsumer “Protection” features. We have just been globalized by this Congressional abdication of representation of our rights and interests. Like a big, black bag of securitized toxic labor forces, we have been handed over as a tranche of mortgages to extra-national control. Think about it.


21 posted on 07/15/2010 12:25:03 PM PDT by givemELL (Does Taiwan eet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Obama has to go.


22 posted on 07/15/2010 12:25:18 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BubbaBasher

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/07/15/politics/main6681481.shtml

Obama says he’ll sign this evening.


23 posted on 07/15/2010 12:26:44 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Months ago I asked what will we do if healthcare passes. Then I asked what we’ll do if this bill passes. So - what are we going to do after they pass cap-n-tax?


24 posted on 07/15/2010 12:28:14 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

brown snowe and collins voted with the dems...plus 2 ind....


25 posted on 07/15/2010 12:28:53 PM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

Brown and Snowe. I thought they had Collins too.

I think the WV seat is still vacant.


26 posted on 07/15/2010 12:28:53 PM PDT by Ingtar (If he could have taxed it, Obama's hole would have been plugged by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: edpc
They should be ashamed of themselves and I hope American voters turn everyone of them that are up for elections this Nov. They have just handed barry hussein soetoro another notch on his Marxist belt.
27 posted on 07/15/2010 12:30:25 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
Excellent cartoon. The GOP needs to explain in simple terms why this is a bad bill.

There is a superb article in yesterday's Wall Street Journal right here.

28 posted on 07/15/2010 12:30:43 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

“There are 41 republicans, so 1 voted with the dems, and one abstained.”

Scott Brown is a traitor to every single person who supported him.
Someone please tell me the difference between having him in the seat vs. Coakley. There is none. Same result. Support for the destructive Obama agenda.

I pray he has a primary challenger in 2012. Brown can take his pickup and drive off a short pier. And he can spare us the bullshit about reading the bill, blah blah, working together, blah blah, compromise, independent, blah blah.

Hey Scott, you were elected for one reason and one reason only. To be the swing vote to STOP ALL Obama legislation. You are epic fail!


29 posted on 07/15/2010 12:32:37 PM PDT by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
The legislation gives the government new powers to break up companies that threaten the economy......

This has "shake down" written all over it. Do as we say and pay, pay, pay......or we crush you.

You've gotta wonder what broad language/powers are in this monstrosity to determine who "threatens" the economy. I guess the current admin doesn't count as the biggest threat.

30 posted on 07/15/2010 12:35:47 PM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
Brutal.

I cannot believe there hasn't been one instance where "O" didn't get what he wanted.

January '13 cannot arrive soon enough.

31 posted on 07/15/2010 12:37:20 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

WHAT a freakin disappointed Brown turned out to be!! I knew right away the moment he stepped foot at the hill with all the smooching going on between him and the RATS that he was going to STAB US IN THE BACK! And there you have it true to word!....FREAKING BASTARDS!! We should demand our money contribution to his campaign BACK!!


32 posted on 07/15/2010 12:39:54 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

We sent our first black president to sweep wall street? Isn’t that a tad racist?


33 posted on 07/15/2010 12:39:54 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeybrau

Well, to sentient beings yes. To the media, if one Republicans votes for it, it’s bipartisan.

Did Bwany Fwank own the mortgage crisis, after demanding loans be provided to people who had not one chance in hell of servicing them?

Of course not. Bush was blamed.

This is not to overlook that Bush and the Republicans did have years to fix it, even if it was a Democrat induced problem.


34 posted on 07/15/2010 12:40:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Latest most accurate Az Poll to date, of 14 likely voters: McCain 137%, Hayworth -37% (+/- 62%))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: edpc
I wonder how many people in Congress actually read it.

I wonder how many of those actually understood it.

35 posted on 07/15/2010 12:43:13 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoKoolAidforMe

Yep. You can bet none of the big Wall Street firms will be touched by this, or they will have special exemptions carved out for them. Those places are Democrat campaign cash machines. Don’t hold your breath for any kind of reform on Fannie and Freddie either. As a matter of fact, NOTHING that was at the root cause of the credit crisis will be touched - just more layers of government thrown on top of a shitty system, with the intent of empowering and expanding the size, scope, and power of the federal government, all the while making sure to preserve the cush jobs of the Democrat Party financiers at Wall Street firms.

No, the real burden is going to fall on small banks, small retailers, savings and loans, credit unions and the 99% of hardworking small businesses that don’t have white shoe lobbying firms on retainer.


36 posted on 07/15/2010 12:44:58 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

We can be reasonably sure Conyers didn’t read it.


37 posted on 07/15/2010 12:45:28 PM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Bush did try to reform Fannie/Freddie. But with something that huge, I believe you really do have to have some kind of bipartisan support.

If the Repubs had forced it, there would have been a massive reaction. You might say "so what, they did the right thing" but pragmatism says that Repubs could have been out of power potentially for decades and then the Dems, of course, would have written even worse legislation...maybe free housing for all.

This way, we get power back more quickly. The truth is ugly, but there it is.

38 posted on 07/15/2010 12:47:37 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: edpc

...another fine mess that’s going to take a generation unf........foul...unfoul.

Maybe we should hire the “de-horders” to clear out old legislation.

ruefully


39 posted on 07/15/2010 12:48:51 PM PDT by petro45acp (Hey Doc! Don't tell me how to live my life. CURE what ails me so I can live how I choose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

What can Brown do TO you?


40 posted on 07/15/2010 12:50:48 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (Anyone can fib. It takes an intellectual to tell a really big lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson