Posted on 07/15/2010 9:12:04 AM PDT by Nachum
On her Bravo TV show Tuesday night, left-wing comedian Kathy Griffin referred to Sen. Scott Brown's two daughters as "prostitutes," and a CNN reporter apparently thought it hysterical. [Audio available here.]
Griffin, who was readying herself for a trip to Washington, DC to rally and drum up support for a repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," brought CNN reporters (husband and wife) Dana Bash and John King onto the show to "coach" her for handling Washington. Bash is a congressional correspondent for CNN, while King anchors the news hour "John King, USA."
When the couple showed Griffin a picture of Sen. Scott Brown and asked her to identify the figure, she responded "Scott Brown – who is a senator from Massachusetts, and has two daughters that are prostitutes."
Bash erupted with laughter, while King grimaced.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Referring to Kathy Griffin as a “comedian” is an insult to entertainers who are actually funny.
To a democrat, being called a prostitute is probably a compliment.
Sounds like a pretty good read on members of the Brown family, daddy Scott certainly likes to whore it around
with the Dems.
Scott Brown isn’t a whore. Whores are paid to give it up.
No problem. CNN is only on at airports, and only the very bored bother to look at it.
Kathy Griffin is a disgusting piece of filt who seems to to do anything for attention. It is like she has never grown past 15 though she looks far older than her 50+ years of age.
I stand corrected.
filt=filth
John King is married to Dana Bash? Wow. She’s awfully horsey in the face. Sorry to be mean but....just sayin’.
Scott Brown like to hang out and vote with the democrats. Have him go to them for moral support. I am tapped out right now when it concerns him.
HA! My exact comment to self......
well ... since it’s now open season on people kids...
What can we say about Obama’s two?
Brown got elected because the minority of Mass voters, like me, wanted someone to represent our interest after 47 years of Ted Kennedy. Here in MA, it’s just about impossible to elect a true conservative. We did have some GOP governors like Weld, Romney, and Cellucci. Not true conservatives but they got elected. And we did get SOME things accomplished,
even if it was something like a (temporary) suspension of
Registry of Motor Vehicle fees.
Do we want half a loaf or no loaf at all?
During the election campaign, Brown said he was an independent voice who would not always vote conservative.
The Dems ran ads saying “Republican Scott Brown...will vote in lockstep with the Republican party”.
Of the two statements above, which was more honest? Brown.
The latter hasn’t happened.
But let’s just nominate a true conservative for GOP
nomination in 2012. He will run against a moonbat like
Mike Capuano. Someone who won’t make gaffes like Coakley did. Whom will the voters choose?
Yeah, we’ll feel much better when we have two moonbat
senators again, not just one. I’m not totally pleased
with Brown but I knew what he would be when I voted for him.
This is Massachusetts...
They have two racist morons for parents?
This coming from a woman whose application to be a whore has repeatedly been turned down.
“Do we want half a loaf or no loaf at all?”
When the left are trying to take power, they have a saying: Worse is better. That is, the worse the situation, the more discontented the people are, the greater the odds that they can be flim-flammed into putting the left into power.
That works.
I don’t see any signs that settling for half a loaf ever leads to a whole loaf, or even three-quarters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.