To: Clintonfatigued; randita; InterceptPoint; Impy; GOP_Raider; fieldmarshaldj; yongin
Minnick will lose for the following reasons:
1. The district is so conservative and so Republican that it gave President Bush 68% in 2004, probably his best performance outside of Texas or Utah.
2. The anti-incumbent, and anti-Democrat, mood is very strong this year.
3. This time, he’s not running in the 2008 environment, and he’s not running against Bill Sali.
4. Raul Labrador will campaign.
12 posted on
07/08/2010 3:38:29 PM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: GOP_Raider; Chief Engineer; Delphinium; EternalVigilance; Keyes2000mt; Sir_Ed; ...
The FR Idaho Ping List
FReepmail GOP_Raider to be on or off this list13 posted on
07/08/2010 11:37:59 PM PDT by
GOP_Raider
(Please consider the logging and timber industries when printing this tagline)
To: AuH2ORepublican
The district is so conservative and so Republican that it gave President Bush 68% in 2004, probably his best performance outside of Texas or Utah.I live in this district, and I can tell you that we are constantly being invaded by Californians and Mexicans. They always vote Democrat. We outnumber them for the moment, but not for long. I do feel, however, that Labrador will win this.
15 posted on
07/09/2010 10:04:29 AM PDT by
America_Right
(The best thing about the Obama Presidency: McCain isn't the President!)
To: AuH2ORepublican
probably his best performance outside of Texas or Utah.Not quite.
Alabama 6th 78% Bush in 2004 according to CQ. (no rat has ran for the seat since 98!)
Louisiana 1st 70%
23 posted on
07/09/2010 5:18:49 PM PDT by
Impy
(DROP. OUT. MARK. KIRK.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson