Posted on 06/25/2010 3:16:32 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Nearly one in five American women in her early 40s is childless, according to a report that shows a striking increase in women who don't have biological children.
The trend was much less common in the 1970s, when one in 10 women did not have children by 40 to 44, the age bracket researchers use to designate the end of childbearing years.
The report, released Friday by the Pew Research Center, cites social and cultural shifts behind the change, including less pressure to have children, better contraceptive measures and expanded job opportunities for women.
(snip)
Overall, the report found that white women are more likely to be childless, as are women with more education. The analysis, based largely on census data, comes amid changing attitudes about women who do not have children.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I remember when people actually had that attitude toward me because I was still a single MAN at 23! I was actually asked point blank more than once,”What is wrong with you”. I finally got married two days after my 28th birthday. By then everyone had given up on me! Times have certainly changed since then, most people consider a 28 year old man too young to have any sense now.
Here Here.. I have always been solitary, but not to the total exclusion of society.
Typical redneck. It doesn't make good soup, even with the microwaves.
Ewwwww!
Kevin, I think you just hung this on yourself:
IQs association with poverty is often ignored, but wholly prevalent.
Poverty, for the most part, is intelligence related. Bad decisions compounded.
True. Forrest Gump, in real life, would have been much more likely to end up broke and homeless than being an independently wealthy Alabama graduate, Purple Heart decorated veteran that owned a string of shrimp boats and millions of dollars in Apple stock and mowed the grass at his old high school because he liked it.
It is not that simple. The trend has started in the second third of 1800s and was most pronounced in France. The wave is only now reaching our shores. It's a crisis of Western Civilization.
Hence, the best selling book and movie. ;-]
I’m just stating the obvious..
Not everyone in the world is fit for parenthood, and many folks in the past who had kids “because it was expected of them” made their children (and themselves) miserable. However, we are still subsidizing the production of litters by those who REALLY shouldn’t be having children, and certain religious groups also work to encourage such people.
Maybe it’s those flat heads infants get from laying in the carrier all day at day care.
“Not gonna say it. Wouldn’t be prudent. Nope.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
No idea what you mean, really, not a clue, nope, not a clue. Can’t figure it out at all, honest.
Nope, my sister is as conservative Christian as it gets. Pretty as picture (class beauty).
She just didn't find a good Conservative man. She is still looking.
Women who missed the natural childbearing time to have children, as a conscious choice, may not realize the emptiness in the midst of that time... it will hit in 20-30 years... at the end of it all.
This is nothing against those who know they are unfit to be a parent or those who cannot have children, just those that chose not to because something else is much more important. Same goes for women who choose to put their young children in childcare at six weeks. When it is too late, the light will go on.
Good. It means you’ve got a healthy mind. I, on the other hand, passed the psychopath test. Really. When I heard the question, I thought it was a trick, it was so obvious.
You know of course that I lied;0)
yeah but what if their sperm isn’t as healthy as they age?
Uh-oh. Welcome to psycho-world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.