Posted on 06/25/2010 9:43:42 AM PDT by Polarik
I didn’t see your post until now, but wanted to thank you for it nonetheless. This was a VERY poorly thought out “lesson plan”, IMHO. Frankly, I’m rather upset about it.
It doesn’t mean I believe Obama is qualified now — I’ve done enough study on my OWN to know there are serious questions that need to be addressed. It just makes my ‘job’ (not a REAL job!!! LOL), and every one else’s harder.
Maybe he wanted to “teach freepers a lesson”, but the consequences go MUCH further in this day and age. What about the lurkers? What about those coming across this issue for the first time and researching on their own?
Yeah, this REALLY T’s me off.
I gave you a several hundred links to criticisms of FactCheck.org
Why are you afraid of the revelations that FactCheck being in Obama’s pocket being made front and center? Him using that outlet to release the COLB instead of, for example, releasing it to the Naitional Archives or Library of Congress is one of the biggest red flags in this whole mess.
Is there a law against taking a picture of yourself in front of a hospital ? (which is what I said in my post....a shot of himself as he walks in the door)
Hell anything even the camel picture would help...but with Smith you get NADA
Conflating Obama and Smith will not help your cause.... Obama has his problems with veracity and Smith certainly has his. They are 2 separate things
Perhaps paid by the Obama propaganda machine.
EXCELLENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It was touted as the original.
But don't let that stop you from shilling for Obama.
It's actually quite funny.
“Nope, they merely betrayed their country and its Constitution.
A country founded mostly by Christians, on Christian principles, by the way.”
How does a person betray their country and its Constitution by working to oust a liar and a fraud who does nothing but give conservatism a bad name?
“Nope, they merely betrayed their country and its Constitution.
A country founded mostly by Christians, on Christian principles, by the way.”
How does a person betray their country and its Constitution by working to oust a liar and a fraud who does nothing but give conservatism a bad name?
Say, wasn’t there an island wide power failure while he was there?
____________
Yep, out all night. They said lightning, but odd there was ZERO rain. ZERO, NADA. How convenient.
Really? Who touted it thus? I never heard anyone from the Obama campaign or from the state claiming it was an original. All I have heard claimed is that it is an officially certified copy.
Too late. It has been alluded to as being Smith's passport stamp.
So it is now Established Fact that Smith provided proof of his trip.
OBOT, curiosity is an OBOT! Can you see the panic setting in as she or he types. lmao
Had Congress wanted to change it, they had two hundred twenty years to pass an amendment. Many amendments were attempted, five in the decade between 2000 and 2010, but none left Congress. The risks involved are real, and the Congress was correct in not amending the Constitution to make Schwarzenegger or McCain eligible. That McCain has put us through this attack shows that he does not have the integrity we need in a chief executive.
At least everyone knows Obama dreamed of his father's objectives, creating a Muslim Marxist Utopia out of his native country. We don't really know if the U.S. is Barack’s “native” country, but that is constitutionally irrelevant. Barack has told us “I am a native born U.S. citizen.” He may be telling the truth. If he is telling the truth, he has told us he is ineligible because one assume he would tell us he is natural born, native born as well has have two citizen parents, if he were. He has told us he is ineligible. But through his operatives, James Carvill among them, promised riots if he is rejected for his ineligibility. Acquiescing to the threat will be shown to have created more dangerous consequences.
First, McCain probably was born in Colon, not the Canal Zone. A birth certificate was released long before the Obama fiasco shows Colon Hospital, including signatures, doctor's names, etc. etc. This is long before the boom in certification and certificate publishning on the Internate. Secondly, the Canal Zone was not a territory over which the U.S. had sovereign jurisdiction. That status for the Canal Zone was addressed in 1937, a year after McCain's birth. If we were to study and agree on a machanism to insure the allegience of the most important figure in our government, while allowing presidential candidates not born on our soil, that sounds just. But we have a Constitution written by very smart and very careful citizens; amending it is intentionally difficult, and requires two thirds of both houses and three quarters of the states. The best summary of that issue is in Professor Geoffrey Chin's paper, “Why John McCain ....” It is available on the Internet. Chin is a liberal Democrat.
ditto
He’s probably over on other threads fighting the civil war again or in his basement with his Abe Linclon blow up doll.
Interesting... I did not know that. Thanks for the information!
I never heard of these lawsuits during the 2000 election. Perhaps the media attention to them was scanty. Could you please provide some links? Thanks.
By Natasha Mozgovaya
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel,"
And,
" Protesters Heckle Rahm Emanuel in Israel
Thursday, 27 May 2010 10:05 AM "
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.