Posted on 06/14/2010 1:24:10 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
A South Carolina lawmaker suggested that new Democratic Senate nominee Alvin Greene may be intellectually incapable of participating in the general election race. Continues...
The world's biggest whiners -- mostly known as "Democrats" -- are whining and complaining that Republicans in South Carolina selected their nominee for them.
Alvin Greene is a jobless military veteran who won the nomination handily last Tuesday, with 59 percent of the vote. Had more voters known about his felony charge before the primary, Greene would've won by an even bigger margin. This was a Democrat primary, remember.
Greene happens to be black. His defeated opponent -- Vic Rawl -- is a white male. On the basis of fairness and out of their deep love for democracy, Democrats want to nullify the primary, force the black guy to bow out so that the white male who lost the nomination can pretend to be their legitimate nominee. Maybe the White House should offer Greene a job running Rawl's campaign on a platform of diversity.
Democrats are poring over the election results, trying to find out how a candidate few people knew could win a primary, versus that household name, Vic Rawl, who was riding high at 4 percent name recognition.
Appearing on NBC's Meet the Press yesterday, Obama honcho David Axelrod questioned Greene's legitimacy. Already there are demands to see his birth certificate. "This whole thing is odd, and I don't really know how to explain it," said Axelrod, bewildered as to how the candidate who got the most votes mysteriously won.
Axelrod devised a winning campaign strategy for a black candidate named "Hussein," but can't imagine a winning campaign strategy for a black candidate named "Alvin Greene."
Appearing on CNN's State of the Union, Democrat Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina claimed their nominee must be a "plant", since we all know Democrat primary voters are geniuses. As to who was behind the plot, Clyburn helpfully narrowed down the list of possible suspects to one -- "someone". "I said he was someone's plant, and it turned up after the elections . . . as I said earlier, something untoward was going on," said Clyburn, summoning his awesome detective powers.
Clearly, this "someone" tricked 100,000 people into voting for Greene because, until now, nothing "untoward" has ever happened in a Democrat primary, not with SEIU and ACORN guarding the integrity of elections.
To get to the bottom of this dark plot, Democrat state Rep. Todd Rutherford recently met with Greene personally to share a deep intellectual discussion. Rutherford told Fox News that "about two questions into a conversation with [Greene] it would become apparent that he's not probably fit to answer the questions fitting a Senate candidate." The black candidate even failed Rutherford's literacy test.
Democrats insist there must have been a plot because Rawl won more absentee ballots than Greene -- racking up 84 percent of the vote in one county. Greene getting 59 percent of the vote is "evidence" of fraud, but Rawl getting 84 percent isn't. Greene didn't run any absentee ballot effort whatsoever -- so it's a real shock that Rawl won more absentee ballots.
Before the primary, hardly anyone had ever heard of Rawl or Greene, so it's a good bet that winning was a function of ballot placement, ergo, Greene won, ergo, Democrats and their entire staff at MSNBC will now spend months in a parodic search for answers to this bizarre mystery, thank goodness. Luckily, Keith Olbermann is heading the probe, sparing no effort to unearth the 'Klansmen for Greene' racket crafted by Michael Steele whose plant robbed Rawl of the chance to lose to Sen. Jim DeMint. And they accuse Greene of being dumb.
Anyway, that's...
My Two Cents...
"JohnHuang2"
I think S. Carolina Dems will pull a N.J. style switch.
a la Torricelli/Lautenberg
Thank you so much for your excellent wrap-up!
They might also question the mental status of the Dim voters in South Carolina, and learn just why they happened to vote for Greene. My guess is no candidate was well known statewide, so many voters just voted for the black guy.
Just get him a telepromter-and them surround with people who claim he is a intellecual without proof-and then call everybody a racist who disagrees—hey wait-we have his brother in the WH.
Yes, those SC voters never cease demonstrating their lack of intellect, whether its Greene or “Lovable Lindsey”. Ol’ Strom should be bewildered, but, no, Strom back Lindsey.
I do too. This was done in the 1974 governor’s race when the primary winner was disqualifed over residency.
” That’s Racist “
Democrats are desperately trying to initiate the Lautenberg maneuver in South Carolina.
He's been doing this for years, and has his own ping list.
And you?
I guyestion the mental status of all LIBs, DIMs and other assorted asshat clowns.
By posting an article he has a venue to bounce off of for his brilliant, timely and humorous essays.
You are certainly welcome to post a thread on the article if you feel so strongly that it should have it's own venue on which to comment.
LOL, that's what John did.
Also, the posting police would surely cry, "Duplicate".
I was commenting on the fact that I have never before seen where he posts his comment in the part where the article goes. Usually he puts his comment in the first post.
Great writing, JohnHuang2!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2534023/posts
: > )
Another winner!!!
LOLOL!!!
I knew you would have a field day with this one!
Excellent, JH2!
I’ve missed reading your two cents lately. I’m glad to see you haven’t lost your touch. ;o)
Great satire, John! Hah!
Democrats are perpetually stunned that people like Greene and John Edwards keep tricking them because the rat voters ‘feel’ rather than THINK. They are so certain that their instints are lasarlike. Never fails to amuse.
Thanks, John ........................ FRegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.