Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The mighty thorium : The nearly perfect energy source nobody has heard of
COLUMBUS DISPATCH ^ | March 7, 2010 | Doug Caruso

Posted on 06/08/2010 6:30:56 PM PDT by george76

Craving reliable energy that doesn't come with a big side order of carbon, the United States is taking a new look at nuclear power.

some engineers also are urging a new look at an alternative to the uranium fuel those plants will inevitably use.

Thorium, they say, provides all the carbon-free energy of uranium - about 300 times more, actually - with almost none of the guilt.

Thorium plants cooled with molten fluoride salt would leave a fraction of the nuclear waste compared to the uranium-fueled, water-cooled plants in use today. In addition, thorium plants can't melt down and don't produce reliable fuel for bombs.

"What's not to love?" asked Kirk Sorensen, a NASA rocket scientist in Huntsville, Ala., who is earning his doctorate in nuclear engineering.

Sorensen has taken up the cause of thorium reactors, an idea conceived in the 1950s and last researched in the United States in the early 1970s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee.

And compared to coal?

So why aren't there thorium reactors all over the country?

(Excerpt) Read more at dispatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Ohio; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: energy; fuel; nuclearplant; nuclearpowered; seawolf; submarine; thorium; uranium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I know it was a big deal when they removed the liquid sodium from the experimental fast neutron reactor near here. Once it was removed, it couldn’t be reloaded.


21 posted on 06/08/2010 7:23:57 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: george76

Obama is backed by Uranium power interests like Exelon (Ayers family) and others and will be predictably advocating for it as his “clean” fuel after GoM BP debacle.

He should be countered by those of us advocation Thorium technology.


22 posted on 06/08/2010 7:24:49 PM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Molten fluoride salts are definitely not benign or non-reactive materials.

Surely some other (phase-change) material can be used for a coolant.

23 posted on 06/08/2010 7:28:10 PM PDT by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer
How hot is molten fluoride salt?

Can't remember...but I do know sodium cooled reactor + water = BOOM!
24 posted on 06/08/2010 7:28:18 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!! Be prepared for what's coming AFTER America......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

India will lead the charge to thorium, imho.

Probably within 10 years.


25 posted on 06/08/2010 7:28:28 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism - "Who-whom?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

If memory serves Lithium bromide Solution was used as the heat
transfer medium with water vapor being the Refrigerant in the Servel Gas Air conditioners. They operated at high vacuum, and worked well until they got a leak, then the LiBr would corrode the unit. You couldn’t get them serviced since every one knows that you can’t take fire and make cold, you need a magician for that.
They did not mention which Br salt, Also wasn’t Chernoble a Liquid Sodium cooled unit
barbra ann


26 posted on 06/08/2010 7:31:02 PM PDT by barb-tex (REMEMBER NOVEMBER!!! Slim as it may be, it is our last hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

g 776, the “salt” used, is Sodium. It will combust spontaneously in air and is potentially explosive in water. It is quirky stuff for some other reasons too as I recall. All and all an extremely hazardous item in an area where stability is premium. Fine for small deep space power sources. Never going to replace PWR / BWRs
Rab


27 posted on 06/08/2010 7:33:02 PM PDT by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher; TruthShallSetYouFree; steelyourfaith; sionnsar; neverdem; patton; Doohickey

I can’t confirm or deny what the Russians did (or did not do!) in their nuclear research programs.

The USS Seawolf was the second nuclear-powered submarine (after the pressurized water reactor Nautilus). Its first reactor worked (it was liquid metal cooled, substantially smaller, lighter-weight, more powerful (power per cubic foot, power per ton basis) than the simpler, less expensive Nautilus.

It ran, it worked, but maintenance delays and maintenance and shutdown problems and complexities (you can’t run a sub’s reactor all the time!) proved to Rickover that the easier to run, easier to build, easier to refuel, easier to maintain pressurized water reactor was the right choice.

And, in the 50’s, it probably was the right choice.

A thorium reactor MUST be prototyped and run for several years to establish best protections and best practices.


28 posted on 06/08/2010 8:04:23 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex
Also wasn’t Chernoble a Liquid Sodium cooled unit

No, Chernobyl was a carbon moderated (solid blocks of pure carbon were piled up around the core and fuel to moderate the fast neutrons and encourage the production of plutonium from uranium. But, once the coolant was lost, the overheated uranium and fuel debris blew out the core's “pressure head” and destoyed the building's roof (which was NOT a containment dome!) but was nice and flat and covered with tar paper.

So the overheated Plutonium and uranium fuel and fuel debris by-products caught the tons of carbon moderator on fire, the building on fire, and the roof on fire. THAT fire lifted the radioactive atoms into the sky up high enough that they didn't settle down locally. In the end, winds aloft blew the radioactive poisons all over Europe and Siberia.

Detectable over here, but only by instruments. Nothing was surface contaminated too bad.

29 posted on 06/08/2010 8:10:47 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

I believe that the Seawolf (SSN 575) was a US Nuclear Submarine with a liquid sodium core.

Problems, problems, problems.

Something about keeping it liquid all the time, interaction with water, bad zoomies, etc.

They replaced the sodium core with a regular naval nuclear core and the sub had an illustrious career doing the Blind Man’s Bluff thing.


30 posted on 06/08/2010 8:17:04 PM PDT by montomike (Politics should be about service and not a lucrative, money-making opportunity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Thanks Robert


31 posted on 06/08/2010 8:20:50 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ak267

More importantly, is the inventor from Chicago?


32 posted on 06/08/2010 8:34:26 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Domangart

Well not exactly, more like 500+ but much less than the half-life of Pu-239 which is about 24,000 years and the 700 million year half life of U-235. Separate it, and burn it, don’t bury it.


33 posted on 06/08/2010 8:44:53 PM PDT by rednesss (fascism is the union,marriage,merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: montomike; neverdem; patton; CholeraJoe; Doohickey; CPOSharky; EODGUY
They replaced the sodium core with a regular naval nuclear core and the sub had an illustrious career doing the Blind Man’s Bluff thing.

Yes.

I can confirm and cannot deny that I worked on the Seawolf nuclear plant (the new one) during those Blind Man's Bluff years at Mare Island - which I can neither confirm or deny actually happened. 8<)

34 posted on 06/08/2010 9:05:37 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: george76

Didn’t a kid make a bomb out of Thorium from lantern mantles a few years back?


35 posted on 06/08/2010 9:19:04 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

The future of nuclear is cold fusion.

Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2270920/posts
Friday, June 12, 2009 11:25:41 PM · by Kevmo · 27 replies · 1,027+ views
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0612/0612201v2.pdf ^ | Reginald T. Cahill

The Suppression of Inconvenient Facts in Physics
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2266921/posts
Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:50:26 PM · by Kevmo · 78 replies · 1,626+ views
Suppressed Science.Net ^ | 12/06/08 | http://www.suppressedscience.net/

The End of Snide Remarks Against Cold Fusion
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts
Friday, June 05, 2009 5:56:08 PM · by Kevmo · 95 replies · 1,770+ views
Free Republic, Gravitronics.net and Intrade ^ | 6/5/09 | kevmo, et al

‘Cold Fusion’ Rebirth? New Evidence For Existence Of Controversial Energy Source
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2212864/posts
Monday, March 23, 2009 12:42:14 PM · by FlameThrower · 35 replies · 1,586+ views
Science Daily ^ | Mar. 23, 2009 | American Chemical Society


36 posted on 06/08/2010 10:16:25 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I was a nub MM/ELT on the Patrick Henry at Mare Island. I had to get some TLD’s from the Seawolf.

No, you can’t come aboard. We’ll git ‘em for ya!


37 posted on 06/09/2010 2:36:10 AM PDT by montomike (Politics should be about service and not a lucrative, money-making opportunity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

From BING....

“Liquid-fluoride-salt heat transfer fluids are proposed to raise the heat-to-electricity efficiencies
of solar power towers to about 50%. The liquid salt would deliver heat from the
solar furnace at temperatures between 700°C and 850°C to a closed multireheat Brayton
power cycle using nitrogen or helium as the working fluid. During the daytime, hot
salt may also be used to heat graphite, which would then be used as a heat storage
medium to make night-time operations possible”


38 posted on 06/09/2010 4:23:07 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Didn’t a kid make a bomb out of Thorium
from lantern mantles a few years back?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/opinion/story/0,12981,1261144,00.html

The Radioactive Boy Scout:
The true story of a boy
and his backyard nuclear reactor,
by Ken Silverstein

39 posted on 06/09/2010 5:50:50 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

“The molten salts are tricky, difficult to work with.

It CAN be done, but they are harder to work with.

(So at least, why don’t START by making a pilot plant to work out the technology? Gee. I wonder.)”

LOL see Westinghouse.


40 posted on 06/09/2010 8:14:32 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson