Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rise of the Thug Left
American Thinker ^ | June 3, 2010 | J.R. Dunn

Posted on 06/03/2010 12:46:24 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Actually, they're getting tough in a lot of places. They proved very tough for Hamas operatives in the Eastern Mediterranean last weekend. They were tough in poor Balto as well, with seven people shot to death. (Baltimore should be one of the jewels of the East Coast, but of course, it's no such thing. I wonder who's been running the place the last century.) It was nearly as tough in Chicago, with twelve shot and three dead. But when has there ever been good news from the Windy City?

But none of these, however bad they may be, have the potential to shake up the political system the way Obama's more feisty allies have been doing over the past year or so.

On Sunday, May 16, a gang of close to five hundred purple shirts (that is, members of the Service Employees International Union, reinforced by something called National Political Action) surrounded the Silver Spring, Maryland home of Greg Baer, corporate law counsel for Bank of America. They claimed to be carrying out a "protest" of the bank's foreclosure policies. That was the excuse for surrounding Baer's home, trampling his lawn, occupying his front porch, and creating an uproar audible throughout the entire neighborhood.

Baer was not home. The only person present was his fourteen-year-old son, who, overcome with fear, locked himself in the bathroom. On returning home, Baer made his way through the mob to rescue his son, suffering near-assault in the process. At no point did the police attempt to control the mob or order them to leave the property. In fact, evidence exists that District of Columbia police actually escorted the mob to the Baer's home. Coincidentally, the SEIU owes almost $100 million to the Bank of America.

This is the third example of blatant violence -- and yes, terrorizing a young boy is violence -- by administration supporters since last summer. (While other incidents have occurred, going back to the Black Panthers menacing voters in Philly, these are the most blatantly violent.) The first was the case of Kenneth Gladney, who in St. Louis on August 6 last year was selling buttons and flags (identified as Gadsden flags, with the rattler and "Don't Tread on Me" slogan, one of the minor ironies of the incident) outside a town hall meeting being held by Democrat Congressman Russ Carnahan. The SEIU, ubiquitous at Democratic events these days, showed up to confront Gladney and demanded to know what "kind of shit" he was selling, along with calling him a nigger. (This from another black, which of course makes it okay.) Gladney's answers were evidently unsatisfactory, and he was then beaten, knocked down, and stomped on, suffering injuries that required hospital treatment. (The purple shirts were identified from video footage. All of them pleaded not guilty this past April 20 -- justice moves frighteningly fast in Missouri.)

Even as the SEIU members were rehearsing their pleas in St. Louis, yet another attack occurred a few hundred miles down the Big Muddy. On April 9 in New Orleans, the Southern Republican Leadership Conference held a dinner at Brennan's Restaurant in the French Quarter. The event generated a protest, as everything seems to do these days. The responsible organization here was the Iron Rail Collective, an anarchist group. The anarchists chased GOP chairman Roger Villeres as he left the restaurant, but this was only the first act. A short time later, fundraiser Allee Butsch and her boyfriend Joe Brown emerged. They were evidently followed and then attacked a few blocks away by at least five people. Both were badly beaten, Ms. Butsch suffering a leg broken so severely as to require an operation.

While the perpetrators remain unknown, the ringleader was identified from video footage (Beard, dirty t-shirt, ponytail -- about what you'd expect). This sense of uncertainty has been used to downplay the political motives behind the attack. Even the Jindal administration played this game, calling the assault an "altercation", as if the two Republican operatives had stolen the anarchists' parking space.

None of these attacks made more than the most perfunctory appearance in the mainstream media...much less so than the arrests of the "Hutaree Army", a strange Midwestern religious group that, whatever their violent and obnoxious rhetoric, have never harmed anybody.

The attacks haven't drawn media attention because they are in violation of a crucial liberal myth, the one holding that liberals are the leading contemporary apostles of nonviolence and peace, holding the line of rational behavior against the assaults by all manner of rabid elements, almost all of them right of center. We've heard that one to the point of exhaustion. It's an unspoken axiom of American politics. Liberals inhabit the Isles of the Blessed, where the lion lies down with the lamb and Willie Horton is only a ballplayer, wearing white togas and discussing conflict resolution in low, melodic voices. And the rest of us? We're somewhere off in the depths of Mordor, on a perpetual rampage, following the demagogue of the moment. These days, that would be Glenn Beck waving a musket and Sarah Palin lugging whatever it is you use to shoot wolves from the air. That's the great divide in American politics, from the liberal point of view, one as sharply defined as the gap between the Eloi and the Morlocks, and as permanent. All they need to do is point to Joe McCarthy (who started out as a New Deal Democrat), Lyndon LaRouche (who helped found the Students for a Democratic Society), and Timothy McVeigh. (A rabid atheist. McVeigh refused to see clergy before his execution and demanded that the old atheist chestnut "Invictus" be recited at his funeral. He actually thought he was going to get one of those.)

What we're seeing now is that myth beginning to unravel. The type of rhetoric liberals have been indulging in the past ten years, the barely-controlled personal attacks and open menacing of every last individual who opposes them -- Bush, Rove, Cheney, Rice, Palin, and Bachmann -- serves as its own fuel. The more it's repeated, the more incendiary it grows, the more it spreads, and the more used to it people become. It's like a narcotic that you grow habituated to -- every time you hit up, you need a bigger jolt. Eventually the threats become so lurid, so wild-eyed, that they begin to take on a life of their own. They become the standard means of expression. And at some definite but unknowable point, they begin to fulfill themselves. Some of your comrades, the more stupid, the more unbalanced, the more fanatical, begin taking them seriously, and start acting them out.

That's the process we're seeing at this moment. The left's civilized elite are still living a delusion, gliding through toga world, while the more unstable elements, the SEIU trash, the anarchists, the ACORN hirelings, are starting to lose it. It will get worse as the Obama dream continues to shred under the pressure of reality. The American left has begun to crack -- deterioration has set in, and it is beginning the long slide into goonhood.

It's all very similar to the events of the late '60s, where wild rhetoric from the antiwar movement and related "revolutionary" outfits -- the Black Panthers, the SDS, the Weather Underground -- triggered ever-graver disturbances around the country until the entire cycle was brought to an abrupt halt at Kent and Jackson State universities. Thirteen people were killed in those confrontations -- the price of cutting the revolutionary left completely out of American society. Students and casual protestors abandoned the antiwar effort. The movement withered and collapsed. The would-be revos were transformed into little more than armed gangs, to be hunted down and mopped up through the ensuing decade.

The more subdued leftists who had aided in triggering the nightmare dodged the bullet in large part by being shielded by media -- at the time effectively a monopoly under liberal control -- along with the fact that their political opposition consisted of Richard Nixon and his merry crew. The Watergate saga was on one level a complex and successful effort to paint the political "establishment" as evil enough to justify the more vicious tactics of the antiwar left. All the same, it required quite some time for leftists to live down the excesses of the '60s.

History may be repeating itself where the left is concerned. But it's doubtful they'll duck anything this time around. Union thugs have none of the romantic air of campus rebels, and the beards and filthy tee-shirts of the anarchists lost their shock value long ago. They will get little in the way of protection from a media that's on the verge of collapse. But even more compelling is the fact that their opposition is no longer a corrupt establishment, but a movement representing Americans as a whole. Conservatives today are no longer the staid, isolated remnant of mid-century, but a tougher, blunter group that comes from a much wider slice of American life. Confront them with people who attack women and threaten children, and it's easy to surmise who's going to end up on deck. A violent left is a dying left. If I were on that side of the fence, I would worry.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acorn; bankofamerica; bofa; cw2; democrats; impeachobama; intimidation; liberalfascism; npa; obama; palin; purplefascism; sarahpalin; seiu; talkradio; teaparty; thugs; unioncorruption; unionthugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
They're not worried, they think Dear Leader has their back.
1 posted on 06/03/2010 12:46:24 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

self bump for later


2 posted on 06/03/2010 1:10:11 AM PDT by Neil E. Wright (An OATH is FOREVER Oathkeeper III We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Their rent-a-mob may look large, but the PEOPLE of this country who do not approve of this behavior are much MUCH LARGER. So they can bring it on, but they will reach a point where they are completely outnumbered. Count on it.


3 posted on 06/03/2010 1:25:16 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I hope they press the issue.

Truly I do.


4 posted on 06/03/2010 1:34:39 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Let me be clear. The voluntary pancipation of Cinco de Quatro is mandated in all 57 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antceecee
...it is beginning the long slide into goonhood.

I disagree! It has always been Goonhood...if you want you can distinguish between the Goons and the Hoods, but there's a new arena called the internet and the commies can't control the information anymore, so the gig is up. November will be a bloodbath!

5 posted on 06/03/2010 1:37:22 AM PDT by gr8eman (Everybody is a rocket scientist...until launch day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

>> but the PEOPLE of this country who do not approve of this behavior are much MUCH LARGER

The Internet is the venue that sustains this truth. And that is why the commie scumbags want restrictions on the connectivity the Internet provides.

What you said is meaningful only when we each know our comrades share this knowledge.

The order and priority of the 1st and 2nd Amendments is indeed a magnificent thing. Not much else matters in comparison since without each everything else goes to hell.

Pardon my disconnected points - it is all relevant, however, to what you suggested.


6 posted on 06/03/2010 1:51:18 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

can we call them brownshirts yet?


7 posted on 06/03/2010 2:04:20 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

Purple People Beaters.


8 posted on 06/03/2010 2:36:13 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; nathanbedford
During the Gore-Bush Florida kerfuffle, I pointed out that Gore's case, at least as presented to the public, was that the Democrats embodied the General Will, and, as such, that mere arithmetic compiling of votes would not be adequate to empower a "winner", if that winner happened to be the Republican.

I also pointed out that parties which claim the right to rule because of General Will, from Robespierre to Pol Pot, eventually need muscle applied to the electoral mechanism.

I predicted then that we would see the emergence of a Democrat sturmabteilung within a few years, to see to it that elections turned out right.

And here they are, right on schedule.

9 posted on 06/03/2010 2:42:30 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If the answer is "Republican", it must be a stupid question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am currently reading Shirer’s Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (yes, I haven’t ever read it yet). As Hitler was organizing and consolidating, the Nazi thugs played an important role, terrorizing and destabilizing, in Germany, and then in Austria (that’s as far as I’ve gotten so far). Far from discouraging them, Hitler silently condoned it, because it was really part of the plan. He knew that he would benefit from the chaos created. In the years leading up to the war, many Nazi’s were really the scum of the gutter, criminals and misfits and thugs. But they served their purpose.


10 posted on 06/03/2010 3:06:09 AM PDT by Old_Grouch (62 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Unbelievable. Yet so few Americans seem aware of these tactics.


11 posted on 06/03/2010 3:25:08 AM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old_Grouch
The rise of Obama has a lot more parallels with the rise of Hitler than you think...
Hitler Obama
Hitler was a nobody, an unknown who rose from nothing very quickly based upon his one skill - public speaking. Obama was a nobody, who rose from nothing based upon one skill - reading from a teleprompter.
Hitler's first real job was Chancellor of Germany. He never even ran so much as as a beer stall before. Obama's first real job was President of the United States of America. He never even ran so much as a lemonade stand before.
The Nazis promised to clamp down on Big Business and end the class struggle. The Obamunists promise to clamp down on Big Business and end the class struggle.
The Nazis appealed to the young, they thought they would fight the evil bourgeois and and establish a youth dominated culture. The Obamunists appealed to the young, brainwashed by their left-wing universities, they thought they would "change" the evil bourgeois and and establish a youth dominated culture.
The NAZIs would use the old sleight of hand trick, accusing their opponents of facism; evil creatures who hoped only to increase the wealth gap and control the downtrodden proleteriat. Hitler gained the young and the old alike with idealism. The Obamunists, accuse their opponents of facism; evil creatures who only wish to increase the wealth gap and control the downtrodden women/minorities/poor/etc.
Hitler gained the young and old alike with vague promises and idealism. Obama gained the gullible old and young alike with vague promises of "Hope" and "Change".
The biggest similarity is the idea of Nationalism and Socialism. Americans are naturally nationalists, and it is a good side to appeal to. Also, Obama is in favor of many socialist initiatives. So, it would be appropriate to call Obama a NAZI (An advocate of National Socialism). Both NAZIs. After first refusing to hold his hand over his heart during a now infamous playing of the National Anthem, Obama realized that he can use Nationalism as another tool to corral the fools.
12 posted on 06/03/2010 3:34:18 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old_Grouch

He even admitted that he was born in Kenya:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwhKuunp8D8

The MSM ignores it.
The Republicans ignore it.


13 posted on 06/03/2010 3:41:46 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The violent rhetoric of the left is catching up with them.

"What you think, you do. What you do, you become."
14 posted on 06/03/2010 3:47:27 AM PDT by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A violent left is a dying left.

I hope this isn't wishful thinking. Right now this 'dying' left seems to be in charge of everything even as it leaves nothing but chaos in its wake. They are trying to destroy the country, and they're succeeding.

15 posted on 06/03/2010 3:53:44 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah, I disagree with the author here. In the late 60s, the Left was not the Establishment. Now (sadly) they are. And, unlike Nixon, they will not be nearly so easy to take down.


16 posted on 06/03/2010 3:59:03 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

“November will be a bloodbath...”

The “goons” are psychotic and some of them have access to the voting process.

Then there is that part of the electorate that loves the goons because they “fight” for “the people”.

Put those two together and this November may not be the rout of Democrats that is so fervently desired.

It may be a bunch of “close” races that always, invariably, go the the Democrat, after weeks of recounts and aggressive lawyers.

The left is made up of visceral, psychotic animals who think they’re the highest evolution of humanity.

IMHO


17 posted on 06/03/2010 4:09:17 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eaker; afnamvet; AK2KX; Ancesthntr; An Old Man; ApesForEvolution; aragorn; archy; ArmedSkeptic; ...
CWII PING. Brownshirts were a pre-requisite to full on fascist takeover in the days before WW2 in Europe.


18 posted on 06/03/2010 4:21:15 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
For your information.


19 posted on 06/03/2010 4:30:17 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

20 posted on 06/03/2010 4:47:57 AM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson