Skip to comments.
Groups want FCC to police hate speech on talk radio, cable news networks
the hill ^
| 6/1/10
| Gautham Nagesh
Posted on 06/01/2010 4:59:19 PM PDT by Nachum
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is being urged to monitor "hate speech" on talk radio and cable broadcast networks.
A coalition of more than 30 organizations argue in a letter to the FCC that the Internet has made it harder for the public to separate the facts from bigotry masquerading as news.
The groups also charge that syndicated radio and cable television programs "masquerading as news" use hate as a profit model.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1984; 1stamendment; 2010electionbias; achillwind; bigbrother; censorship; cultureofcorruption; dissentispatriotic; dnctalkingpoints; doublestandard; fcc; firstamendment; groups; hate; hatespeech; internet; ivorytower; liberalfascism; obamalegacy; obamascandals; obamunism; orwelliannightmare; partisanwitchhunt; police; policestate; pravdamedia; rushbashing; stalinisttactics; staterunmedia; talkradio; thoughtcrime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
1
posted on
06/01/2010 4:59:19 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
Seems to me part of freedom is the freedom to hate and to express it no matter how offensive it may be to some people. Guess I got that wrong...
3
posted on
06/01/2010 5:00:34 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
(What do you call a peaceful Hamas protester? Deceased.)
To: Nachum
These groups are equivalent to book burners.
4
posted on
06/01/2010 5:00:53 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: Nachum
Looks like ACORN is getting their mojo back.
5
posted on
06/01/2010 5:02:51 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: FourPeas
I know there is one radio station in NYM (Black Station)
that is constantly on “whitey’s” case. Wlll they be included in the monitoring process?
To: FourPeas
It is freedom of thought they want to shut down
7
posted on
06/01/2010 5:04:11 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Political Correctness Kills)
To: Mr. Wright
Above post should read NYC (New York City) — sorry for the goof!
To: Nachum
Internet has made it harder for the public to separate the facts from bigotry masquerading as newsThe problem is not the internet. The problem is that people are too stupid to separate opinion from facts.
9
posted on
06/01/2010 5:04:25 PM PDT
by
GSWarrior
(Businessmen are more trustworthy than professors, politicians and preachers.)
To: Nachum
reading the comment section on The Hill sent chills down my spine.
Amazing how many fascists live amongst us.
10
posted on
06/01/2010 5:05:47 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(Ill behaved women rarely make dinner.)
To: Nachum
Free speech thing sure is a bitch, isn’t it.
11
posted on
06/01/2010 5:06:06 PM PDT
by
farlander
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: Nachum
Who decides what is hate speech
12
posted on
06/01/2010 5:06:48 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Hi Mom sarc ;))
To: Nachum
A coalition of more than 30 organizations argue in a letter to the FCC that the Internet has made it harder for the public to separate the facts from bigotry masquerading as news. This will be the undoing of ABCBSNBCMSNBC, etc., because the Internet, in many respects, has shown the bigotry masquerading as news!
Dan Rather's biased lying about GWB's National Guard records comes to mind.
13
posted on
06/01/2010 5:07:25 PM PDT
by
lonestar
(Better Obama picks his nose than our pockets!)
To: Gene Eric
"These groups are equivalent to book burners" I disagree. Book burning is a celebration of freedom. This administration is not about freedom.
|
|
|
To: Nachum
A coalition of more than 30 organizations argue in a letter to the FCC that the Internet has made it harder for the public to separate the facts from bigotry masquerading as news. Excellent. Publish the names and principles of the aforementioned 30 organizations.
Sure would be fun locating them...
5.56mm
15
posted on
06/01/2010 5:08:25 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: Nachum
..."masquerading as news" use hate as a profit model".
Must be talking about MSNBC /s
16
posted on
06/01/2010 5:08:41 PM PDT
by
D1X1E
(Trust but verify... especially if you got your information from the government.)
To: Nachum
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is being urged to monitor "hate speech" on talk radio and cable broadcast networks.
Getting into the "hate speech" designation is basically having one group tell another group that they don't like what they're saying. Sorry... that's not the free speech that should be available on the Internet and on the airwaves.
Sure, this kind of free speech means that things get "hammered" that I don't like to see getting hammered -- like people saying ridiculous things about Christianity (for example). But, I'll put up with that, so that -- on the "other side of the coin" that no one comes back and says I can't talk about things from what Christianity says, too ...
Those "others" can hammer away all they want on things like Christianity and I'll hammer right back ... LOL ... that's the kind of free speech that I like ... :-)
17
posted on
06/01/2010 5:08:42 PM PDT
by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: Nachum
...and so it begins.
18
posted on
06/01/2010 5:09:09 PM PDT
by
mware
(F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
To: sauropod
More than half. They might as well come out and name Fox News and conservatives. Any idea they oppose is deemed “hate speech.” They think that preventing people from speaking will keep reality from intruding upon their fantasy utopia.
19
posted on
06/01/2010 5:10:17 PM PDT
by
kenth
To: Nachum
And these are the same groups pushing “net neutrality.”
20
posted on
06/01/2010 5:10:45 PM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson