1 posted on
06/01/2010 4:59:19 PM PDT by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
Seems to me part of freedom is the freedom to hate and to express it no matter how offensive it may be to some people. Guess I got that wrong...
3 posted on
06/01/2010 5:00:34 PM PDT by
FourPeas
(What do you call a peaceful Hamas protester? Deceased.)
To: Nachum
These groups are equivalent to book burners.
4 posted on
06/01/2010 5:00:53 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: Nachum
Looks like ACORN is getting their mojo back.
5 posted on
06/01/2010 5:02:51 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Nachum
Internet has made it harder for the public to separate the facts from bigotry masquerading as newsThe problem is not the internet. The problem is that people are too stupid to separate opinion from facts.
9 posted on
06/01/2010 5:04:25 PM PDT by
GSWarrior
(Businessmen are more trustworthy than professors, politicians and preachers.)
To: Nachum
reading the comment section on The Hill sent chills down my spine.
Amazing how many fascists live amongst us.
10 posted on
06/01/2010 5:05:47 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Ill behaved women rarely make dinner.)
To: Nachum
Free speech thing sure is a bitch, isn’t it.
11 posted on
06/01/2010 5:06:06 PM PDT by
farlander
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: Nachum
Who decides what is hate speech
12 posted on
06/01/2010 5:06:48 PM PDT by
al baby
(Hi Mom sarc ;))
To: Nachum
A coalition of more than 30 organizations argue in a letter to the FCC that the Internet has made it harder for the public to separate the facts from bigotry masquerading as news. This will be the undoing of ABCBSNBCMSNBC, etc., because the Internet, in many respects, has shown the bigotry masquerading as news!
Dan Rather's biased lying about GWB's National Guard records comes to mind.
13 posted on
06/01/2010 5:07:25 PM PDT by
lonestar
(Better Obama picks his nose than our pockets!)
To: Nachum
A coalition of more than 30 organizations argue in a letter to the FCC that the Internet has made it harder for the public to separate the facts from bigotry masquerading as news. Excellent. Publish the names and principles of the aforementioned 30 organizations.
Sure would be fun locating them...
5.56mm
15 posted on
06/01/2010 5:08:25 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: Nachum
..."masquerading as news" use hate as a profit model".
Must be talking about MSNBC /s
16 posted on
06/01/2010 5:08:41 PM PDT by
D1X1E
(Trust but verify... especially if you got your information from the government.)
To: Nachum
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is being urged to monitor "hate speech" on talk radio and cable broadcast networks.
Getting into the "hate speech" designation is basically having one group tell another group that they don't like what they're saying. Sorry... that's not the free speech that should be available on the Internet and on the airwaves.
Sure, this kind of free speech means that things get "hammered" that I don't like to see getting hammered -- like people saying ridiculous things about Christianity (for example). But, I'll put up with that, so that -- on the "other side of the coin" that no one comes back and says I can't talk about things from what Christianity says, too ...
Those "others" can hammer away all they want on things like Christianity and I'll hammer right back ... LOL ... that's the kind of free speech that I like ... :-)
17 posted on
06/01/2010 5:08:42 PM PDT by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: Nachum
...and so it begins.
18 posted on
06/01/2010 5:09:09 PM PDT by
mware
(F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
To: Nachum
And these are the same groups pushing “net neutrality.”
20 posted on
06/01/2010 5:10:45 PM PDT by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Nachum
The problem is that the Obama administration will be the ones deciding what is hate speech. What is this, Venezuela?
21 posted on
06/01/2010 5:10:55 PM PDT by
DHSMostWanted
(God give me the strength to deal with ignorant liberals.)
To: Nachum
Yea!I think a good place for the FCC to monitor would be the three Terrestrial Networks,CNN,CNBC,MSNBC and any other left-wing loony broadcasters in the United States.
I haven't heard any So called Right-wing Talk Radio or TV networks threatening violence against our boy president.If I could type president smaller I would because this boy presently occupying that office is very small.That's why he has to constantly reaffirm that he's the president.
To: Nachum
Hmm, why don't we start with the hate speech Bill Maher spewed the other day!? Oh, wait, I forgot, liberals get a pass on this one, too.
29 posted on
06/01/2010 5:16:08 PM PDT by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: Nachum
I keep hearing, 'You can't believe everything you read on the internet.' This is always from people whose truth meter is broken or who have relied all their life on someone else to tell them what is real.
The internet is the best freedom of speech vehicle we have ever had. Those who love freedom know this.
31 posted on
06/01/2010 5:18:27 PM PDT by
Do Be
(The heart is smarter than the head.)
To: Nachum
Any of these fedgoons ever hear of the 1st Amd?
38 posted on
06/01/2010 5:21:44 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: Nachum
But if we hear and read Bad Things, we might do Bad Things! It's for our own good!
/sarc
39 posted on
06/01/2010 5:22:14 PM PDT by
Nepeta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson