Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

looking for feedback - my constitutional amendment
vanity | 29 may 2010 | sten

Posted on 05/29/2010 4:19:47 PM PDT by sten

over the passed couple of years, i have become more and more worried about the state of our country. in particular, the size of the debt and the speed at which it has been increasing. and that speed has been increasing most recently with no end in sight. if this continues, as it did with the USSR, there is no doubt the country will cease to exist in its current form.

here are the basic facts as of 2009:

gross domestic product: $14,000 b
national debt as of today: $13,000 b
annual federal receipts: $2,105 b
congressional budget: $3,518 b

these numbers are out of whack. the budget of the US exceeds all monies brought in by $1,413b or 167% of all receipts. this would be similar to making $50k/yr and spending $84k on your credit cards... which are already at $40k.

to fix this situation, congress and the federal government needs to be reigned in. unfortunately, there are NO controls that currently exist within the framework of the Constitution to restrain congress from committing financial suicide.

as such, i would propose the following amendment to the US Constitution in order to save the country and insure its future.

"During years where the national debt exceeds 25% of the GDP, the budget of the Congress shall be restricted to no more than 75% of federal receipts brought in the year before. The remaining 25% shall go to repay the national debt in an effort to reduce the debt below 10% of the GDP.

During years when the debt exceeds 5% of the GDP, but is less than 25%, the budget of the Congress shall be restricted to no more than 85% of the federal receipts.

At no time shall the budget of the Congress exceed 125% of the federal receipts."

if this amendment were in place today, the congressional budget would be forced to stay within $1,579 b, while paying off the debt @ $526 b per year. this would continue until the debt reached $3,500 b, which would take about 18 years. at that point, the federal budget would be allowed to grow from 75 to 85% of the federal receipts, which would be $1,789 b, while paying $316 b to the remaining debt. it would take roughly 9 years until the debt is reduced to $700 b, or 5% of the GDP. once that occurs, Congress would be able to increase their budget to no more than $2,630 b on receipts of $2,105b, or 125% of all federal receipts. in roughly 27 years the country will have climbed out of the hole.

i believe this plan would resolve the impending financial crisis, reassure our debtors that we are serious about repaying the debt, while also insuring we never return to such a situation.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: constitution; nationaldebt; taxes; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
looking for comments / suggestions. i'm trying to rectify the situation before it hits the fan.
1 posted on 05/29/2010 4:19:47 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sten
At no time shall the budget of the Congress exceed 125% of the federal receipts

Should another global conflict occur, you'd have to allow for whatever it costs to keep the country independent.

2 posted on 05/29/2010 4:23:00 PM PDT by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

I see them using it to raise taxes to confiscatory levels.


3 posted on 05/29/2010 4:23:45 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

What do they want? BRD ?


4 posted on 05/29/2010 4:24:45 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sten

Do you realize how much federal spending is “off-budget”?

Do you realize that mandating the states to spend money would happen under those rules?


5 posted on 05/29/2010 4:24:47 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

A BRD pipeline straight to DC


6 posted on 05/29/2010 4:25:17 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

taxes and how they are apportioned also needs to be addressed as having 1 in 10 pay for everything is a sure fire way to start a revolt.

one step at a time.


7 posted on 05/29/2010 4:26:04 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sten

I think it is too late to turn back. You’ll probably see the bankers get some sort of global governance to save their skins. Expect to hear “The world is too big to fail.” as a global government of the bankers’ selections, by the bankers’ decree, and for the bankers takes effect. They built the house of cards that has allowed the current mess. They’ll do whatever they can to push off the day of reckoning that will come when their system crumbles.

Even if your amendment passed, do you think congress would abide by it? Congress is criminal and out of control.


8 posted on 05/29/2010 4:26:28 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

if it helps shift some power back to the states, that would be a good thing.

reigning them in is the point.

please help by suggesting updates / tweaks


9 posted on 05/29/2010 4:28:26 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sten

I also have a Constitutional Amendment proposal:

The federal government shall expend all revenues raised on the Constitutional duties of the federal government and no other entity, institution, persons or organization.

No more welfare, no more subsidies, no more giving grant money to leftwing groups like ACORN, Planned Parenthood, NPR, PBS etc etc.


10 posted on 05/29/2010 4:28:27 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

The states won’t get more power, they will get federal mandates.


11 posted on 05/29/2010 4:29:22 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sten

Do you really expect this to pass both houses of Congress by two-thirds majorities? There is no way Congress will limit their ability to drive us into insolvency.


12 posted on 05/29/2010 4:29:29 PM PDT by Hoodat (.For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

How about “Congress shall make no law.”?


13 posted on 05/29/2010 4:29:35 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

agreed. so... the amendment needs teeth to force congress to abide by it?


14 posted on 05/29/2010 4:29:35 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sten

Supposedly, those people take an oath of office which, if broken, is supposed to have some sort of penalty.

It probably would not make any difference.


15 posted on 05/29/2010 4:31:35 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

if something like this doesn’t pass... there will be a revolt by the citizens of the country (which i believe they want) and would result in tearing the country apart (another thing the progressives want)

tweak the language... help mold it.


16 posted on 05/29/2010 4:31:59 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sten
We have a constitutional requirement to balance the budget in Cal. Hasn't been balanced for I dodn't know how long. When it comes to spending laws do not stop them. They will find a way, ike a heroin addict who needs to chip.

The only solution is to cut federal activities which are not allowed by the constitution and elect a majority of responsible people. Up hill fight.

17 posted on 05/29/2010 4:32:12 PM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I don’t want the idiots in DC from either side of the aisle to do anything more than abide by the constitution.


18 posted on 05/29/2010 4:32:40 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: whence911

so there needs to be some form of citizen recall capability if Congress is in violation of spending more than Constitutionally allowed... something that would be black & white @ the end of the year by a financial oversight committee (not run by congress)

i’d be good with that


19 posted on 05/29/2010 4:35:12 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

so how do we keep them in check? they do what they want, which many times is not under their Constitutional powers.

limiting their funding under threat of recall isn’t too bad. it’d keep them from funding programs that are wasteful


20 posted on 05/29/2010 4:36:37 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson