Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom McClintock Joins House Republicans to Launch New 10th Amendment Task Force
Auburn Journal ^ | 5/6/10 | Bill George

Posted on 05/16/2010 6:45:05 PM PDT by Bokababe

Representative Tom McClintock (R-Granite Bay, CA) joined Republican Study Committee (RSC) Chairman Tom Price (R-GA), Congressman Rob Bishop (R-UT) and nine other Republican Members of Congress to officially launch the newly formed 10th Amendment Task Force, a project of the RSC. The Task Force will develop and promote proposals that aim to disperse power, decision-making, and money from Washington back to states, local governments, and individuals.

The Task Force was created in response to the concentration of power and the one-size-fits-all solutions from Washington. Representative McClintock made the following remarks at today’s press conference:

“I believe that it can be stated as a universal maxim that the failures of our government can be traced to a single cause: the abandonment of federalism.

“The tenth Amendment was not written to protect states rights. Experience has shown that state governments can be just as abusive of their authority as any other government.

“The tenth Amendment is rather about dividing governmental authority to limit the abuse of power that naturally occurs when it accumulates into too few hands.

“The Founders knew that the ultimate check upon an abusive or dysfunctional government is the ability of people to walk away from it. By limiting the federal government to those enumerated powers that serve a truly national objective, our Constitution disperses the remaining powers among 50 states and a hundred fold more communities.

“Those states that are governed unwisely naturally lose population and commerce and revenues to those that are governed well. It is a self-correcting mechanism.

“In 1821, Jefferson warned that "When all government, domestic and foreign, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."

“We have reached that point, and the time has come to restore the genius of the American founding by restoring those principles of federalism that are the foundation of our freedom and the natural ramparts that protect us against both folly and despotism.

“I can’t imagine more important work than that which this task force now sets out to do.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; constitution; elections; lping; mcclintock; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Bokababe

GOP TOM GO BTT


41 posted on 05/17/2010 9:23:40 AM PDT by jokar (The Church age is the only age man will be able to glorify Christ, http://www.gbible.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Tom McClintock is one of the few remaining good things about CA!

FYI Californians: Tom endorses Steve Poizner.


42 posted on 05/17/2010 10:12:15 AM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

No, he is correct. The delegation of authority is from the People, through their elected representatives in a Constitutional Convention, not the States. The People are the master, the state and federal government are the servants. The only power they have is what the People have given them through their written constitutions. In America, and this is an important difference from Europe, individuals retain power that they have not delegated. They kept back individual liberties from government over which authority was not delegated. The exercise therof was subject to the Maxim “sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas” - each one must so use his own as not to injure his neighbor. (Equality of rights before the law.)

In France, the individual surrendered all his individual natural power in exchange for what was considered to be superior enumerated civil rights which were subject to the communal good.


43 posted on 05/17/2010 10:12:44 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Tom McClintock is more than a promise. He delivers.


44 posted on 05/17/2010 11:00:07 AM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marron
National forests, national parks, national monuments, national wilderness lands should all be handed back to the states where they are located along with the personnel who manage those lands, for thes states to do with as they deem fit.

I wonder what that would mean for a place like Yellowstone, which is shared by Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho. I suppose the three state legisl00tures could hammer out an agreement, subject to approval by Congress per the Constitution, of course.

45 posted on 05/17/2010 5:59:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (70 mph shouldn't be a speed limit; it shoud be a mandate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

I hope that this task force studies the ramifications of repealing the 17th Amendment, as long as they are all about dispersal of power back to the states and the people. Repeal would return us to a federal Senate, but could also give us more Democrat Senators.


46 posted on 05/17/2010 6:01:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (70 mph shouldn't be a speed limit; it shoud be a mandate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
I more or less agree with your premise but it does raise at least one critical question: Does a State have a moral obligation if not Constitutional duty to become involved in the defense of its citizens against an overreaching feral government? Also, as the government nearer to "The People", would it not generally put the States in the positon of being more closely attuned to the will of its people?

Having read some of the Founders' thoughts and other writers that followed, it appears to me the idea was that The States themselves would be jealous guardians of their retained powers, thereby keeping the feral government in check.

I think we would all agree, something went awry.

47 posted on 05/18/2010 4:52:48 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have just two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson