Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pill ruined the institution of marriage, says Raquel Welch
The Daily Mail (U.K.) ^ | May 11, 2010 | Simon Caldwell

Posted on 05/11/2010 12:48:54 AM PDT by Stoat

Raquel Welch has blamed the Pill for the decline of the institution of marriage.

The Hollywood actress said the widespread use of oral contraceptives had led to a breakdown in sexual morality and fuelled the growth of rampant promiscuity among the young.

Miss Welch, 69, said the situation has grown so grave that 'these days nobody seems able to keep it in their pants or honour a commitment'

While she argued that it carried some benefits, she said the enduring legacy of the Pill has been social anarchy.

Miss Welch has been a sex symbol since she sprang to international fame for her role in the 1966 film One Million Years BC - and was voted by readers of Playboy magazine as 'the most desired female of the 1970s'.

But in an article to mark the introduction of the Pill to the U.S. market 50 years ago, she distanced herself from the fruits of the sexual revolution of which she was a part.

 

'The growing proliferation of birth control methods has had an awesome effect on both sexes and led to a sea change in moral values,' she said in an article for television channel CNN entitled 'It's SexO'Clock in America'. 

A positive consequence of the Pill was it had 'made it easier for a woman to choose to delay having children until after she established herself in a career', she said.

Miss Welch, who has three failed marriages behind her, added that a 'significant and enduring' effect on women was the idea that they could have sex without any consequences - with the result that fewer today saw marriage as a 'viable option'.


(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; contraception; contraceptives; culturewar; culturewars; feminazism; hollywood; marriage; moralabsolutes; raquelwelch; sexpositiveagenda; sexualrevolution; socialanarchy; thepill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-189 next last
To: Tax-chick

Yes, order means something. You sent a flippant post to me that sounded a little hostile since the post you were mocking was a serious post, but I decided to take it as a joke.

You then sent a second flippant answer to me that made it clear you were just being hostile, especially after I have elaborated on my original post in a number of longer, more thoughtful posts.

Now even after all this, you are persisting in your flippant hostility.

Why not just speak openly and tell me what you are trying to say?

If you disagree with me, then tell me why, this snippish crack making is tiresome.


121 posted on 05/11/2010 2:02:21 PM PDT by ansel12 (MITT: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I’m making you upset. I’m sorry about that, and I will not post to you again.


122 posted on 05/11/2010 2:03:24 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Amateurish," agreed Janet Napolitano, the White House amateurishness czar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
I saw the other day that a Pill for men is in the works. I say it is a great idea, but could they really get men to take such a pill? I don’t think so. I hope they do however, I want men to take some of the responsibility of not making babies.

Would women trust a man who says he's taking the pill??

123 posted on 05/11/2010 2:06:59 PM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty

It isn’t jaded, and rather than narrow, it is looking at the history of courting rather than the narrow view of the last 40 years only.

What do you think drove courting and dating methods for centuries, and why do you think it changed so much in the 1970s?

What could return things to what they were before the 70s?

Making sex a one way street for men again, like it was throughout history, that would make the females come up with a new way to maintain equilibrium, my guess is that they would revert back to the old ways of restraint, and control over their sexual favors.


124 posted on 05/11/2010 2:09:31 PM PDT by ansel12 (MITT: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

You could just speak openly to me, so that I could have a chance of answering you.


125 posted on 05/11/2010 2:10:51 PM PDT by ansel12 (MITT: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

She is right.


126 posted on 05/11/2010 6:06:53 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

His point is that right now, women hold all the choices in a sexual relationship.


127 posted on 05/11/2010 6:08:40 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty; ansel12
Do you read the magazine “First Things”? It pretty much confirms what ansell2 is saying.

Contraception made sex very cheap for men and women, but left the ultimate choice for reproduction with women. Many women use this as a way to get money, control, or just fit in (my wife teaches high school, and the latter is a big factor).
What is interesting is the article talks of the resulting cost to marriage. It leaves the pool of marriable men rather small for most women, while the dating or hook up pool is very large. And most of the time, the two pools don't over lap.

It is the article “Bitter Pill”.
http://www.firstthings.com/

128 posted on 05/11/2010 6:20:31 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Was there an article with this thread?

 

It's over there, just behind the white column.....I think.

 Raquel Welch

129 posted on 05/11/2010 6:21:41 PM PDT by Stoat (If you want a vision of the future, imagine a Birkenstock stamping on a human face... forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Even at 69, I would love to ravage her.

She is still a gorgeous woman.

 

 Photobucket

130 posted on 05/11/2010 6:30:41 PM PDT by Stoat (If you want a vision of the future, imagine a Birkenstock stamping on a human face... forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

She’s on my “bucket list”...been there before ‘bucket lists” were invented!


131 posted on 05/11/2010 6:35:38 PM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver ("To be born into freedom is an accident; to die in freedom is an obligation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus
Some other things the pill has ruined:

Who knows by how many magnitudes more people have been murdered by abortifacient birth control than by surgical abortion? Surgical abortion is just the tiny tip of the enormous iceberg. The pill is insecticide against people in a world that is increasingly and grotesquely misanthropic. It is a brutal chemical attack against Creation and Creation's Holy God. It is the seed of our self destruction. It should have been called the suicide pill. 


Agreed on all counts. 
As several others have said, I believe that the destruction of marriage also has quite a bit to do with the rise of militant feminism and the ease of divorce, which can occur seemingly on a whim it seems.
When nothing is held Sacred, then nothing really functions correctly anymore.
I wish that I knew of a way to put the 'genie' back into the bottle.
132 posted on 05/11/2010 6:38:14 PM PDT by Stoat (If you want a vision of the future, imagine a Birkenstock stamping on a human face... forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat
Don’t forget the “Hannie Calder” pics... /g

 

It's hard to forget something that's been burned into the pathways of one's neural landscape ;-)

 Photobucket

133 posted on 05/11/2010 6:42:05 PM PDT by Stoat (If you want a vision of the future, imagine a Birkenstock stamping on a human face... forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I agree with this post.


134 posted on 05/11/2010 6:48:17 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: narses; cpforlife.org
Thank you both very much for pinging your lists  :-)

 Thank You

135 posted on 05/11/2010 6:49:29 PM PDT by Stoat (If you want a vision of the future, imagine a Birkenstock stamping on a human face... forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
My goodness, she was beautiful.

 

Indeed...

 

Photobucket 

 

and she still is  :-)

 

Photobucket 

136 posted on 05/11/2010 6:57:45 PM PDT by Stoat (If you want a vision of the future, imagine a Birkenstock stamping on a human face... forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

well it didn’t seem to work in her case. three marriages.


137 posted on 05/11/2010 6:59:16 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Miss Welch, 69

Must...keep....mind....out....of....gutter....

138 posted on 05/11/2010 7:00:19 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse

“When the pill is given to teenagers...one can understand the mess and ....the big business”

Depends upon why teenagers are taking them. I took them as a teenager because it cleared up my acne as well as regulated my cycle and stopped severe cramping.


139 posted on 05/11/2010 7:03:17 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

All I know is I want to look like her when I’m 69.


140 posted on 05/11/2010 7:03:57 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson