Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Call me crazy, but I don't think America is ready to have a bulldyke who calls her female husband 'Frank' making decisions that could affect this country for centuries.
1 posted on 05/10/2010 1:16:47 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: DesertRenegade

*shrug* Ok, please to meet you, Mr Crazy...


2 posted on 05/10/2010 1:18:00 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 473 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

just wait till he replaces Ginsberg with a 3rd bull on the court.


3 posted on 05/10/2010 1:18:20 PM PDT by omega4179 (www.jdforsenate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
“It’s not anything I’m going to get into,”

Because you're a guy?

4 posted on 05/10/2010 1:19:41 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

The more dysfunctional the better as far as the kenyan is concerned. The longer the prison record, the larger the amount that was evaded on taxes, the more they hate America. There is no limit to the insanity.


5 posted on 05/10/2010 1:19:56 PM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

“Elena went through the same vet that everyone else goes to”

Thats because she is a dog.


6 posted on 05/10/2010 1:20:00 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions: $1 Halfbaked: 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Perhaps Westboro Baptist “Church” will show up at her confirmation hearings. ;-)

But seriously, since she’s already demonstrated her extreme anti-heterosexual bias at every opportunity, at this point her own “sexual orientation” is a moot point. We already know that she would side with the gays, and thus regardless of her personal life she is an enemy of moral governance.


7 posted on 05/10/2010 1:20:29 PM PDT by sthguard (The DNC theme song: "All You Need is Guv")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade; tx_eggman
"Elena went through the same vet that everyone else goes through"

Which, apparently, is NONE!
8 posted on 05/10/2010 1:20:34 PM PDT by SpinnerWebb (In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

“Elena went through the same vet “

uh...


9 posted on 05/10/2010 1:20:38 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
“That’s just a broad answer.”

You really can't make this stuff up.

10 posted on 05/10/2010 1:20:52 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Top White House officials bristled Monday when asked whether they think Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan’s sexuality will become an issue in her confirmation hearings.

“It’s not anything I’m going to get into,” said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs

______________________________________________

Of course not, Mr. Gibbs. No man ever has.

My suggestion? Send Janet over. SHE’LL get into it all right.


11 posted on 05/10/2010 1:21:23 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
Gibbs was asked a handful of times about rumors that Kagan is gay, and gave terse responses each time.

Gay? I think we're jumping the gun a little here.

Let's first determine if she's actually a woman. She looks like the spawn of a bizarre Mike Myers/Nathan Lane/Matthew Broderick gene splice.

Given The One's predilection for masculine Clintonistas, can a nomination for Jake Reno be far behind?

13 posted on 05/10/2010 1:22:11 PM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Nominating an open pervert to the Court is unconscionable. There is no excuse. She needs to be filibustered.


14 posted on 05/10/2010 1:22:26 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

“Mr. Gibbs, is she ashamed of who she is? Does she think there is something wrong with that sort of lifestyle?”


15 posted on 05/10/2010 1:22:29 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

You may be correct, but personally I don’t care what she does in her bedroom as long as she’s an originalist Justice who actually doesn’t treat the Constitution as a “living document”.


16 posted on 05/10/2010 1:22:38 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

““It’s not anything I’m going to get into,” said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs”

I can only guess the WH has a don’t ask, don’t tell policy in effect for Supreme Nominees. I wonder why?


17 posted on 05/10/2010 1:22:59 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Butch is a bulldyke? You mean she is a unicorn?


18 posted on 05/10/2010 1:23:00 PM PDT by Tarpon (Obama-Speak ... the fusion of sophistry and Newspeak. It's not a gift, it's just lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
“That’s just a broad answer.”

ROFLOL!!!

Oh the irony........

19 posted on 05/10/2010 1:24:33 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
When asked what the White House was defending Kagan from, Gibbs said: “That’s just a broad answer.”

Oh, Beltway Bob did NOT use the word BROAD (in gay purple) in a sentence about Kagan, did he??? LOL. Will the lesbians of the US protest his BIGOTED remarks about one of their 'sisters' (which I'm really not sure is a factual description of Kagan)?? /sarc

And FWIW, DR, I don't think you're crazy. I don't want another bigoted 'justice' on SCOTUS. Period. What is with all this crap about her being 'for the little guys/people/dienfranchised/whatever'??? A justice is NOT supposed to be FOR or AGAINST anyone--they are supposed to be UNBIASED and IMPARTIAL! D'oh!! >:-(
20 posted on 05/10/2010 1:25:33 PM PDT by pillut48 ("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue" ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
“It’s not anything I’m going to get into,” said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs

Translation: Yeah, she's a Diesel-Dyke.

21 posted on 05/10/2010 1:25:37 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade; All
"When asked what the White House was defending Kagan from, Gibbs said:

“That’s just a (she's just a regular") broad answer.”

22 posted on 05/10/2010 1:27:10 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson