Posted on 05/09/2010 8:12:50 PM PDT by howkn
Manning: "Why is it that Columbia is so silent? And why are they acting so arrogantly? I know this is painful for you as students to hear me make these charges. But the evidence is irrefutable. Obama wasn't there! You have access to the records. Why don't you do this. Why don't you go into the records, Look at the classes, go through the procedures that I've done with an investigation in your same system, And you will discover that he was not there."
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Hey I fully welcome legitimate documentation of the legal pedigree of this stranger the majority of Americans elected president. I use this word stranger in the political sense of what has been up to now expected role of the president of these United States, in fulfilling an oath taken in Constitutional duties. BamBam is nothing of what previously came before. Yes, some have been bent left, but none have been in our face, I am taking you down as fast as I can get Congress to pass said decrees.
I find it deceptive the manner and methodology used to front this man as being the exact opposite of what he literally is, for example, using himself as 'another Reagan'.
I have heard of Manning, but do not have the time to 'follow' him or keep up with what he has to say.
But I have been told and keep reading that to question the legitimacy of BamBam, is serving some leftist purpose of demonstrating some kind of 'kook' right fringe.... well I am still waiting for that day to arrive wherein all this depository of evidence is presented to expose any who wonder where this guy came from and what is his real story given the flood of deception presented by him and his handlers to-date.
The fact that only the 'you are a kook, IF', is the most and only evidence presented to demonstrate 'kookiness' the threat has lost its intent to cause 'fear' to question...
I get your drift. And I do play around from time to time. But after awhile, they break down a bit.
BTW, I just did a scan of howkn’s previous threads (he’s been a member since Feb. 2010) and they are all about Manning. Further, many of his posts are to himself...which indicates to me that he is trying to stir the pot.
Ooh, the story came out in a Columbia alumi magazine? Surely they could do better than that story from his old off campus roommate. A story that has nothing to do with Obama being at Columbia.
Has Manning called him anything at all, or even mentioned his name?
agree with you on this. I do not understand why there is so much criticism of Rev. Manning. After all does he not have the same freedom of speech that Eric Holder, Anita Hill, Ayers, Rev Jeremiah Wright, Farrakhan & Obama have? As I read many of the comments and see the ridicule of Rev. Manning the same bogus underpinnings stand out to me as when I read about the case for controlling what is said or not said in the media. Who is more deserving of mockery? Rev Manning is no more bazaar to me than Obama’s state of the Union when he lied and mislead us. If the Rev has nothing of substance to present then so be it. I wish I could go see it.
Who are you? Maybe your an Obot. Who cares what your friend said they saw.
Reverend Manning is. And I'll tell you why. We expect liberals and democrats to try and baffle us with bulls***. That's what they do. We do conservatism no favors when we try to champion the insanities that Rev. Manning is trying to sell.
Obama was a drug dealing CIA agent working for al Qaeda? Get real. This garbage is an embarrassment to Free Republic, --or at least it would've been at one time.
Multi tasking and astral travel.
To: howkn
Manning: “Information that goes absolutely nowhere....Those of you who have used our time in chasing down your erroneous information, We'd like to say to you, ‘Here's how we want to deal with everybody from this point forward about information and anonymous tips regarding the CIA, Columbia, Obama Sedition and Treason Trial...’
“I believe the test of whether or not your information is true, and we should spend time verifying and documenting what you are saying is true...”
“If you will in your information piece refer to BHO, as “The Long Legged Mack Daddy, if you'll call him that, we'll know you're on the right track. If you will also refer to Michelle Obama, as Michelle - “The Fist Bumper” ...
“And you must also, and this is the third request, refer to Reggie Love, Obama’s personal assistant, as “The Black Monica Lewinsky.”
This is one of the best Manning videos, he is calling out Obma supporters who are trying to through him off. Basically Manning is stating that Obama is having a homosexual relationship with Reggie Love.
6 posted on April 18, 2010 8:13:30 PM by howkn
The above is just one example of howkn's posts to himself, from a thread started by...howkn.
howkn is either a shill for Manning or someone who would like to incite outrageous comments from Freepers in order to discredit this site.
Personally, I think he is a shill. But I think the Admin Moderators should be aware.
As I stated above I have heard of Manning, but I do not follow him.... People that title themselves or cause others to address themselves 'Reverend' cause me to pause... Beside the point but relevant to removed the focus upon anything claimed by him.
I think this claim that liberals are trying to snooker 'conservatives' about the legitimacy of BamBam missed who it was for self serving with the presidency at all cost birthed the birther movement.
This 'accusation' began with Hillary Clinton as purpose to win, not start some movement to discredit conservatives. Because at the time it was birthed there was not enough conservatives upon the political scene for her to give a hoot about what conservatives would be doing. After all who was her Republican competitor in the presidential race??? Certainly NO conservative politician.
So keep beating across the brow the notion this question of legitimacy is about demonstrating conservatives as kooks all you want but Hillary never does anything that is not for the purpose of serving herself. And if anything were to cause her to looooose bigger time than she did, it would have been a full blown exposure of what her campaign set in motion questioning the qualification of BamBam to be a qualified Constitutional candidate.... She let it go because he out caucused her.
Now personally I have no clue what the truth is regarding his legitimate qualifications, but since the continued demonstrated FEAR by some on the Republican, NOT conservative side that we are going to become the party of kooks has not happened, rather the Jon Stewart comedy routine, even out of BamBam himself is their take seems a bit remarkable to me....
Since when are conservatives cowered by Jon Stewart comedy media types?
It must be as Manning has Obama working for the CIA fighting the Soviets alongside Afghan Mujahedin, working for the CIA as a drug dealer back here in America and, presumably not working for the CIA while studying Marxism at the Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University in Moscow during the time-frame that more lucid accounts have Obama attending Columbia.
Maybe Obama just accumulated a lot of frequent flier miles (on his Indonesian passport, naturally).
The quality of the story is irrelevant. What is relevant is that, by publishing it, the College implicitly verified that Zero is an alumnus.
There you go - getting all Alinsky.
'Implicitly verified'? LoL! Because the alumni mag wrote the story so it has to be true. /sarc
NOBODY REMEMBERS OBAMA AT COLUMBIA ( But heck, we're all just racist birthers...yea right! )
-snip-
"Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but none remembered him.
Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me.
I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. Ever! Nobody recalls him. I'm not exaggerating, I'm not kidding." Root adds that he was also, like Obama, "Class of '83 political science, pre-law" and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him.
At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me.
No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, the macha who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him. Is that not strange?
It's very strange." Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia."
-end snip-
Obama was one scarce fellow around the Columbia campus from 1981 to 1983.
interesting note about Baron and Wolf , seems neither has any memory of obama until they were ‘reminded’ by the obama campaign staff. How can you write glowing reports on someone you don’t even remember!
To the extent that Obama was a student, yes. The alumni mag
didn't write the story, they only published it. And by so doing, they verified only the fact that it was about a former Columbia student. Which is what Rev. Manning makes an ass of himself disputing.
It's very strange." Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia."
You have to understand, it was his ascetic period
. He hid out, away from distractions, away from people, in the library. Kind of like ole Karl, a century and half ago, in the Reading Room of the British Museum, analysin' capitalism and cooking up a pantload of grief for the 20th century.
If Manning wants to get on Obama's case, more power to him! Especially as a black preacher! But he needs to stick the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
LOL, don’t hold your breath(check past posting history). Few and far between.
Definitely
If Manning wants to get on Obama’s case, more power to him! Especially as a black preacher!
______________
I agree but I am so not buying that CIA story garbage. I’ll reserve final judgment until I hear what he has, but I have a sneaky feeling, it’s not going to be a lot of nothing. I hope that I’m wrong, but this is just so far out there, CIA? Come on.
If he had his ducks in a row, he wouldn’t be asking members of the Columbia community to bring him evidence of his assertions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.