Reverend Manning is. And I'll tell you why. We expect liberals and democrats to try and baffle us with bulls***. That's what they do. We do conservatism no favors when we try to champion the insanities that Rev. Manning is trying to sell.
Obama was a drug dealing CIA agent working for al Qaeda? Get real. This garbage is an embarrassment to Free Republic, --or at least it would've been at one time.
To: howkn
Manning: “Information that goes absolutely nowhere....Those of you who have used our time in chasing down your erroneous information, We'd like to say to you, ‘Here's how we want to deal with everybody from this point forward about information and anonymous tips regarding the CIA, Columbia, Obama Sedition and Treason Trial...’
“I believe the test of whether or not your information is true, and we should spend time verifying and documenting what you are saying is true...”
“If you will in your information piece refer to BHO, as “The Long Legged Mack Daddy, if you'll call him that, we'll know you're on the right track. If you will also refer to Michelle Obama, as Michelle - “The Fist Bumper” ...
“And you must also, and this is the third request, refer to Reggie Love, Obama’s personal assistant, as “The Black Monica Lewinsky.”
This is one of the best Manning videos, he is calling out Obma supporters who are trying to through him off. Basically Manning is stating that Obama is having a homosexual relationship with Reggie Love.
6 posted on April 18, 2010 8:13:30 PM by howkn
The above is just one example of howkn's posts to himself, from a thread started by...howkn.
howkn is either a shill for Manning or someone who would like to incite outrageous comments from Freepers in order to discredit this site.
Personally, I think he is a shill. But I think the Admin Moderators should be aware.
As I stated above I have heard of Manning, but I do not follow him.... People that title themselves or cause others to address themselves 'Reverend' cause me to pause... Beside the point but relevant to removed the focus upon anything claimed by him.
I think this claim that liberals are trying to snooker 'conservatives' about the legitimacy of BamBam missed who it was for self serving with the presidency at all cost birthed the birther movement.
This 'accusation' began with Hillary Clinton as purpose to win, not start some movement to discredit conservatives. Because at the time it was birthed there was not enough conservatives upon the political scene for her to give a hoot about what conservatives would be doing. After all who was her Republican competitor in the presidential race??? Certainly NO conservative politician.
So keep beating across the brow the notion this question of legitimacy is about demonstrating conservatives as kooks all you want but Hillary never does anything that is not for the purpose of serving herself. And if anything were to cause her to looooose bigger time than she did, it would have been a full blown exposure of what her campaign set in motion questioning the qualification of BamBam to be a qualified Constitutional candidate.... She let it go because he out caucused her.
Now personally I have no clue what the truth is regarding his legitimate qualifications, but since the continued demonstrated FEAR by some on the Republican, NOT conservative side that we are going to become the party of kooks has not happened, rather the Jon Stewart comedy routine, even out of BamBam himself is their take seems a bit remarkable to me....
Since when are conservatives cowered by Jon Stewart comedy media types?