Posted on 05/05/2010 10:41:27 PM PDT by STARWISE
'The question has been asked and answered, and I think we should all move on now'
###
..... the governor of Hawaii is now publicly voicing the alleged exact location of Obama's birth, saying "the president was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii"
The disclosure is believed to be the first time a state government official has declared the precise place where Obama was born, despite numerous other published claims, including some for a different hospital in Honolulu.
The remark came Sunday night when Gov. Linda Lingle, a Republican, was interviewed on New York's WABC Radio by host Rabbi Shmuley Boteach. (The subject was addressed at the 77-minute mark HERE.)
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Thanks for the details. I missed that post a few days ago, but I’ve watched Ron’s Youtube presentation.
Murder of Attorney Hemenways son in Virginia, same atty who represents LTC Lakin
-----------------------------
Horrible, to say the least. One thing to note though, Attny Hemenway is NOT representing LTC Lakin. Allegedly, he even tried to dissuade Lakin from going this route.
Thanks for the correction.
The details I was thinking about especially were the motives for current/former military to be psyopsing on FR.
Er, ah...make that a "Headline."
haha.
“Babys race isnt on there, so we can rule that out.
Baby’s race isn’t on the short form (COLB). Does someone know if it is on the long-form, “original” BC in Hawaii?
Facinating. Would the numbering possibly make sense of Obama was born at Queen’s Hospital, instead?
Does that change something?
It does not appear to be on the Nordyke twins long form:
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/NordykeTwinsBirthcertificate.jpg
Babys race isnt on the short form (COLB). Does someone know if it is on the long-form, original BC in Hawaii?
I'm pretty sure the answer is no, however the baby's race is collected and used in natality reports. For example the DOH would report how many white babies were born, negro babies, etc., in a particular year. Somewhere that info is collected, but I don't see it being the reason Obama would hide the original certificate.
There are reports of when Ann was with the newborn messiah in Seattle/Mercer Island/Washington State that she had been staying with a friend of Madelyn's. Ann supposedly had borrowed said friend's car to drive to see Susan Blake. Just who was this friend and where did the friend live? Vancouver, Canada is only a couple hours drive (in those days with less traffic). Back in the day, an embarrassing pregnancy was hidden with a visit to some far away friend or relative.
The numbering only depends on what date the BC was received at the state registrar’s office. I’m not sure when Queens submitted their BC’s. If they submitted theirs on Tuesdays then the “date filed” could be accurate for a Queens birth. But there is no way that the certificate number would work with that scenario.
No matter how you slice it, either the “date filed”, the certificate number, or both have been altered. That wouldn’t be necessary if Obama was just hiding something embarrassing. If he was actually born at Kapiolani the “date filed” on his COLB would be Aug 11, 1961 and it wouldn’t make any sense for him to change that.
I don’t see any way that he was born at Kapiolani.
And if his certificate number was really what is on the Factcheck COLB, why would he change the date filed? Especially since the odds are good that whoever really has that number was born at Kapiolani on August 4th and had their BC filed on Aug 11th just like the Nordykes.
There is a child who was born Aug 4th and died Aug 5th. To know that certificate number to put it on his forged COLB, Obama would have to have a little “help” from somebody at the HDOH though...
A confident post.
And the CDC report for 1961 says that if the child was a mix of Negro and anything else, the child was to be classified as Negro.
Margaret Hemenway is the spokesman for LTC Lakin and his attorney Jenson.
Anything’s possible at this point.
But anything that would be on a sealed BC is totally separate from the reason that he’s hiding what the HDOH has as his original BC. There’s something he has on the BC in Hawaii right now that is threatening to him even though it isn’t considered to be an “embarrassing” item in the eyes of Hawaii law.
I think it’s a note that he amended an item on the medical portion of his BC in 2006 to finally complete the BC (something that could have been accomplished by a visit to a Hawaii doctor within 30 days after his birth) and was thus given a 2006 certificate number.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.