When Barry met Billy

American Thinker ^ | May 1, 2010 | Thomas Lifson

[libstripper]

I am much less interested in the recycled National Enquirer report of an Obama tryst with a mistress than I am with the question of when Barack Obama first met William Ayers. The estimable Ed Morrissey of Hot Air previews a new book that claims to have uncovered evidence that the two men met far earlier than the campaign's claimed date of 1995. Ed quotes the book's co-author Aaron Klein:

[null and void]

ping

[bgill]

I remember reading about the mailman a long time ago. Why is it being touted as new? Of course, it’s always good to rehash the usurper’s lies.

[EternalVigilance]

Thanks for the ping.

[freekitty]

I agree.

[reasonisfaith]

Thanks to all you dedicated Freepers and other vigilant Americans, the pieces of the criminal Obama puzzle are becoming known. I am grateful to you.

Obviously he’s a marxist. Obviously his advisors are marxist, and those who troll for him on conservative websites.

But something is really bothering me. When have these marxists ever taken a good look at their ideology? When have they ever presented a justified explanation for marxism, even to themselves?

Now if there are any trolls out there, any who might run across this post by pure coincidence—I think the troll game is pretty much fizzled out. You people have no credibility, even among those who still think you’re conservative (if this doesn’t apply to you, just let it go.) My challenge to you people is: just show me, even with a little hint, that you have at least a minimal grasp of the alleged benefits of socialism.

Whatever your answer is, and whether or not you provide it openly, I am confident it will require a correction from someone who actually does understand socialism.

“How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.” (quote by Ronald Reagan)

[reasonisfaith]

And don’t answer with sarcasm, which in this case would be a veiled surrender and an admission that socialism is for fools from top to bottom.

[bgill]

Thanks for posting this earlier article. I don't remember if it was this one or another one but I knew I had read about the letter carrier some time ago.

Hulton agreed that it was an exceptional event to encounter a black man on his route and that Obama may have felt it prudent to introduce himself to the letter carrier before approaching the Ayers house

In the early 70's, a black family was going to buy a house in our middle class white neighborhood and the father, a doctor, went around asking the neighbors if it was ok if they moved in. We thought it strange and that we had moved beyond much of the racial thing even in Texas. It's hard to believe that in Chicago in the '80s this was still happening but whatever. Maybe it was more of Hussein being so full of himself that he had to introduce himself to mail carriers.

Mr. Obama said that he intended to become President of the United States.

The machine was in motion a long, long time ago.

[BuckeyeTexan]

You people have no credibility, even among those who still think you’re conservative (if this doesn’t apply to you, just let it go.)

If you want me to "let it go," then stop pinging me to your comments accusing me of being a shill for Obama. I loathe the communist SOB.

[Lady Jag]

This criminal president thing is getting ridiculous.

[AmusedBystander]

Has anyone else noticed that the mistress story appears on the fringes whenever questions about 0bama’s carefully hidden life arise?

Those 60's radicals were known to sleep with both sexes frequently. Wouldn't want to discriminate you know.

[nolongerademocrat]

Yep!

[thecodont]

When Obama was at Columbia, Ayers was at Bank Street College (BSC), where he received an M.A. in Early Childhood Education — 371 yards down the street.

What sort of M.A. degree is "Early Childhood Education"???

[nolongerademocrat]

Here’s another connection: Valerie Jarrett’s Mother - lifelong friends with the Ayers family -
http://barracknow.blogspot.com/2009/09/frank-marshall-davis-jarretts-and-ayers.html

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2418

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_108950.html
(Connects WeatherUnderground to Soviets)

http://bellalu0.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/william-ayers-and-bernadine-dohrn-digging-a-little-deeper-and-who-is-chesa-boudin/

Ayers to Chavez thru Chesa Boudin
http://www.eviltwinbooking.com/events.cfm?view=Speakers&artist_id=159

http://theliberalheretic.com/blog/node/893

http://zombietime.com/obama_and_the_weather_underground/

[nolongerademocrat]

http://www.oxy.edu/x8270.xml
It was at Occidental where he stopped being called “Barry” and became Barack Obama, Newsweek pointed out in its account of Obama’s formative years that featured his black-and-white freshman photo on the cover. “It was when I made a conscious decision: I want to grow up,” he told the magazine.

Found it!

http://zombietime.com/obama_and_the_weather_underground/
Barack Obama’s
Close Encounter with the
Weather Underground

Did the presidential candidate and the revolutionary terror group cross paths at a violent 1981 anti-Apartheid protest?

Black Student Organization - Coalition for a Free South Africa active at Columbia in 1981.

[wintertime]

"When you have as many areas of your life deliberately obscured as Obama does, there is always the chance of being caught in a major lie." ( Thomas Lifson)

The leader of a foreign occupying force would deliberately obscure his life.

Rush Limbaugh read the essay, " A Stranger in our Midst" on Friday afternoon. Personally, I think this was one of Rush's finest hours, and possibly will even be recorded as historic.

The point of the essay, "A Stranger in our Midst",( and Rush's point as well) is that Obama does not act like an American! Obama and his communist minions( which includes Bill Ayers) act like an occupying foreign regime! Rush himself said that this is why he uses the word "regime" when referring to the Obama administration.

The following is from that essay that Rush read:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2504757/posts/p>

"This disquiet was a slow realization. Awareness began with Obama's odd pre-presidency associations, decades of being oblivious to Rev. Wright's anti-American ranting, his enduring friendship with the terrorist guy-in-the-neighborhood Bill Ayers, and the Saul Alinsky-flavored anti-capitalist community activism. Further add a hazy personal background -- an Indonesian childhood, shifting official names, and a paperless-trail climb through elite educational institutions. "

A normal, true-blue, red-blooded, "Born in the U.S.A. ( as Springstein would say) does **NOT** have a hazy personal background, or a paperless birth record, paperless childhood, paperless shifting names, paperless foreign travel, or paperless education record.

A **normal** American would immediately be honored to release these common documents related to birth, childhood, college admission and attendance, as well as passport travel.

Thomas Lifson in this thread's essay points out that Obama has gone to considerable efforts to obscure his life. Well! Gee! That's exactly what we would expect from a communist foreign occupying force.

After auditioning countless political terms, I finally realized that the Obama administration and its congressional collaborators almost resemble a foreign occupying force, a coterie of politically and culturally non-indigenous leaders whose rule contravenes local values rooted in our national tradition. It is as if the United States has been occupied by a foreign power, and this transcends policy objections. It is not about Obama's birthplace. It is not about race, either; millions of white Americans have had black mayors and black governors, and this unease about out-of-synch values never surfaced.

Yep! The Obama "regime" feels like a foreign occupying force!

While the author of "A Stranger in our Midst" claims that it is not about birth place, of course it is! If he were writing about a **normal** American president, the two words "birth and place" would have never been a glimmer of a thought in the author's mind.

If the author of a "Stranger in our Midst",Robert Weissberg , were writing about any other American president, he would have absolutely no reason to mention "birth place". Why?

Answer: Because the birth place ( and natural born status) of every other American president was absolutely **self-evident**!! The personal background of other president ( and most real Americans) is CLEAR, not "hazy" or "deliberately obscured". For **normal** Americans armies of witnesses stand ready to proudly testify that they know the parents, visited the new baby and mom in the hospital or at home, attended the christening, and watched the child grow to maturity, knew the man or woman as a school friend or boyfriend or girlfriend, was proud to be a co-worker or collaborator on a project. NORMAL Americans do not have friends that have tried to kill police or blow up the Pentagon!.

This president and his minions feel like a foreign occupying force! Lifton uses the expression a "deliberately obscured" life, and focuses on Bill Ayers, but "birth place","hazy personal background", and deliberately confused relationships with people like Ayers, are only three of many factors that add to our feelings of disquiet and unease concerning Obama. Why?

Because a normal American would be HONORED to prove with all of the best evidence that he was a natural born citizen. A normal American is proud of his friends. A normal American has a clear, open, and transparent "personal background", that can be fully documented with certified paper. A NORMAL American does not have friends that are TERRORISTS like Bill Ayers!

A foreign usurper who does not understand the American culture would go to great lengths to keep his origins hidden.

When Thomas Lifson states in this essay on this thread states,

"When you have as many areas of your life deliberately obscured as Obama does, there is always the chance of being caught in a major lie.", ...Well!...Of course there is a chance Obama is lying! That is what a leader of a foreign communist occupying force would do! The essay "Stranger in our Midst" helps us to understand why we are not dealing with a normal American.

The obvious next question is: "Is is possible that Obama is not even an American at all?"

[nolongerademocrat]

http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2008/10/why-obamas-colu.html

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mxc7dIOGZX0J:africanactivist.msu.edu/organization.php%3Fname%3DColumbia%2520Coalition%2520for%2520a%2520Free%2520South%2520Africa+coalition+for+a+free+south+africa&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

David Gilbert blogging from prison
http://www.prisonactivist.org/archive/pps+pows/davidgilbert/sds-wuo.html

Black Student Organization
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Developing+their+minds+without+losing+their+soul:+black+and+Latino...-a0203022047

[Jedidah]

Yes.

I’ve long assumed that Obama and Ayers knew each other in New York during the Columbia years. (Not that we know much about that.)

The story about the mailman that is referenced in the American Thinker article is not new. It’s been floating around for a while.

[lucysmom]

“You people have no credibility, even among those who still think you’re conservative (if this doesn’t apply to you, just let it go.)

If you want me to “let it go,” then stop pinging me to your comments accusing me of being a shill for Obama.”

Well darn, Buckeye, you responded and now he knows you’re a socialist. Such is the logic of reasonisfaith.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Well darn, Buckeye, you responded and now he knows you’re a socialist.

Yep. Silly me. I should know better. But what about you? You responded to me. So doesn't that make you an indirect socialist?

[tutstar]

The First Time I Heard of Barack.

According to this the Soviets knew of it and had a hand in it long ago.