Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re: Obama's birth and qualifications for the presidency
Vanity | May 1, 2010 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 05/01/2010 1:22:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

One of the constitutional requirements for the office of the presidency is that he be a "natural born citizen." This was put into place by the founders to keep foreigners or persons who do not bear a non-questionable allegiance to the US Constitution out. Obviously, and admittedly Barack Hussein Obama was born to a foreign citizen and is not 100% American. He's half-American, half-African and all Marxist. He obviously bears no allegiance whatsoever to the US Constitution and is working overtime to destroy it. He's a usurper and should be removed from office. He is exactly the kind of fraud/usurper the founders feared.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; noaccountability; nobc; nobirthcertificate; nodocumentation; nohonesty; nojustice; nonormalcy; notransparency; notruth; obama; treason; usurper; whatisobamahiding; whoisbarackobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 441-453 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Proudly standing tall as a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America, unlike our Usurper-In_Chief.

A check is in the mail to FreeRepublic, LLC.

Anyone care to join me?


201 posted on 05/01/2010 6:41:02 PM PDT by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Someone whose father is a British subject is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

I think you are confusing a British diplomat with a British subject.

202 posted on 05/01/2010 6:43:56 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Wright
If anybody knows the real story, in my humble opinion it would be one of the following: NSA, CIA, or FBI. These three agencies would have the wherewithal to acquire any and all information needed on anyone; Obama included.

They have to already KNOW or have been told NOT to dare question whatever personal information they should have been able to investigate and is now under massive protection from public knowledge and $2 million dollars in security to keep it that way.

Something is rotten and it ISN"T in Denmark. The presidency seems to have been unvetted to a candidate who couldn't meet the muster of the CIA, FBI or NSA himself nor apparently able to fulfil the mandates for the office set forth in the US Consititution via terms set forth there.

203 posted on 05/01/2010 6:48:26 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: null and void; melancholy

Thanks for the pings.

I feel a tsunami brewing.....and I can hardly wait.


204 posted on 05/01/2010 6:49:07 PM PDT by Rushmore Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Rushmore Rocks

BTTT


205 posted on 05/01/2010 6:50:54 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Perhaps this is an example of the perfect storm. It appears the DNC and the RNC had an agreement not to challenge the eligibility of each others nominees.

Then members of both parties fell into lock step with their organizations.

I could be wrong...but...

206 posted on 05/01/2010 6:52:37 PM PDT by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

But he wasn’t eligible either having been born in a hospital in a town (Colon, I believe) Panama that was not on U.S. territory or military base at the time. You can see where that would put him in a very weak position to go after Obama which is maybe one reason McCain got the nomination when it appeared that he wasn’t doing well enough to get it.


207 posted on 05/01/2010 6:53:27 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes; TigersEye

“The real object of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, in qualifying the words, “All persons born in the United States” by the addition “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” would appear to have been to exclude, by the fewest and fittest words (besides children of members of the Indian tribes, standing in a peculiar relation to the National Government, unknown to the common law), the two classes of cases — children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation and children of diplomatic representatives of a foreign State — both of which, as has already been shown, by the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America, had been recognized exceptions to the fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the country.”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html


208 posted on 05/01/2010 6:56:41 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Glad to see FR is not afraid. We are not afraid either.


209 posted on 05/01/2010 7:02:21 PM PDT by blasater1960 ( Dt 30, Ps 111, The Torah is perfect, attainable, now and forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1234
The ‘country’ needs to exhaust the adjudication process first: the legal system’s gotta take a stand, to further clarify where we are.

The legal system appears to be complicit in protecting the secrecy and potential fraud perpetrated upon the American people.

There are some who've stated they believe removal of this president from office will instigate massive burnings of cities and riots. This is a nation that should never fear its citizens, the vast majority of whom are law-abiding and love their country. We also need to trust those appointed to uphold our laws (especially the highest courts) and thus far, that trust is at a dangerous and unparalled low. There seems to be no end to the corruption we're seeing on a daily basis.

210 posted on 05/01/2010 7:02:40 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I agree it was fixed. If you are correct as to why, the Republican party got some things they didn’t bargain for (I hope). I know there has been a lot of discussion about what would happen if BO were declared ineligible with regard to the outcome of the election. It’s a good question because it was an odd set of circumstances. Both Biden and Palin were on a ticket with a running mate who was not a natural born citizen. I doubt that was an accident.


211 posted on 05/01/2010 7:04:05 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Well put Jim!....

Can’t wait so say:

“He’s dead Jim!” (politcially speaking of course)


212 posted on 05/01/2010 7:06:49 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54
Both Biden and Palin were on a ticket with a running mate who was not a natural born citizen. I doubt that was an accident.

Yep. What are the odds that both candidates would be ineligible??? Top that with Palin being brought in with known skeletons, but too many fell in love with her so she had to be smeared and shut up. Biden was a known idiot and would do whatever he was told. The more you look at the election, the more you go hmmmm.

213 posted on 05/01/2010 7:11:32 PM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Wouldn’t you have loved to hear the talk in both camps about Palin’s unexpected popularity? She was picked to be the obscure backwoods bumpkin that made McCain look like even more of an old fool than he was. Instead, she turns out to be the fly in the ointment, the monkey in the wrench... the pain in the ass.


214 posted on 05/01/2010 7:22:34 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Can we not find ONE senator, or one representative who will state the obvious? If not, this country is toast. We have to stop this would-be Hitler and his intentions of taking over our government. I mention Hitler because the situations were strikingly similar to the conditions of the country and the emergence of “the one” who offered change. I’m really afraid for America now. They are so willing to embrace this obvious sham of a president and the MSM have sold their souls to him. I am even frustrated with FOX. NO ONE is asking him the hard questions about his past. We know NOTHING. Should that make us feel ok when we know nothing of his birthplace, his background, his education? NOTHING! I have written to O’Reilly, Glenn Beck. Why won’t you explore Obama’s birth? I say with all sincerity, if we don’t stop him, he will destroy America and he is on a fast track because he knows if we get to November and we have free and fair elections, he may well have to negotiate and dictators don’t like to negotiate.


215 posted on 05/01/2010 7:22:56 PM PDT by rtbwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
“Obviously, and admittedly Barack Hussein Obama was born to a foreign citizen and is not 100% American. He's half-American, half-African and all Marxist.”

Well, I can't sign up to the half-American part. Seriously, is the contention really that someone who has one foreign national for a parent cannot be fully American? Does that also exclude people who had a foreign national parent when they were born but who later nationalized? Honestly, where do we draw the line on who is fully American, and why even bother? The majority of our Marxists by now are home grown from two citizen parents.

Obama is certainly a leftist, and I can even understand this carrying on about what is or is not a “natural born citizen,” though I think most of it is ultimately incorrect. But if Obama was born in Hawaii to an American mother, he is every bit as much an American as any of us.

Being American isn't some magic key to enlightenment. Just because someone is an American doesn't mean they can't be wrong on issues, or subscribe to a political philosophy I believe is incorrect. I will certainly oppose and vote against Obama’s policies, which I believe are incorrect, but denying that he's even an American seems a self-defeating place to start in terms of organizing politically meaningful opposition. [Note: If one produces real evidence that Obama wasn't born in America, then this discussion, of course, changes drastically.]

216 posted on 05/01/2010 7:23:01 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54

;)


217 posted on 05/01/2010 7:24:04 PM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
There are some who've stated they believe removal of this president from office will instigate massive burnings of cities and riots.

Therefore, the whole country is held hostage and is systematically destroyed because one segment of regime dependents will riot if we follow the Constitution!

No wonder, Eric Holder had the stones to call us a nation of cowards. PC is killing the spirit of this country!

In November, the ballot box will be a riot!

218 posted on 05/01/2010 7:24:14 PM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

I don’t know. He’s the most unAmerican president I’ve ever known.


219 posted on 05/01/2010 7:25:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
“I don't know whether they agree or disagree with me or do you. It is a fallacy to believe in this political climate that their actions or lack of actions tell us what they believe in. Acquiescence is not the same agreement.”

A fair point. I readily concede this.

“Hawaii has been deceptive in their actions and candor, which has been well documented on FR.”

But on this, I do not agree. Hawaii is limited by privacy laws as to what they can overtly do. But the GOP AG and governor could readily find ways to leak incriminating evidence if it actually existed. That this hasn't happened leads me to be more inclined to believe that there is no incriminating information to leak.

220 posted on 05/01/2010 7:25:15 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 441-453 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson