Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A weapon that can strike anywhere on Earth in 30 minutes
NY Post ^ | April 25, 2010 | SHARON WEINBERGER

Posted on 04/25/2010 3:16:32 AM PDT by Scanian

Call it a reusable space vehicle. Call it a space plane. But whatever you do, just don’t call it a space weapon.

That’s the message from the Air Force after last week’s launch of its X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle, which can stay on orbit up to 270 days. The Air Force won’t say what, exactly, the robotic space plane will be doing there, how long it will linger this time, or even how much it costs. But the military is already in the process of building a second aircraft, which will fly next year.

Officially the Air Force has described the X-37B, which is lofted into orbit by a rocket and then can land like an aircraft on a runway, as a test vehicle. As for the secrecy surrounding it, Gary Payton, the deputy undersecretary of the Air Force for space programs, says simply that the aircraft’s experimental payloads are classified “like in many of our space launches.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airforce; banglist; boeing; elvisbinladen; nasa; orbitaltestvehicle; spaceexploration; spaceweapon; x37b
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2010 3:16:32 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian
anywhere on Earth in 30 minutes


2 posted on 04/25/2010 3:22:20 AM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

obamanation must not have known about this for he surely would have scuttled any tests—or given it to hamas or binladen


3 posted on 04/25/2010 3:24:25 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Bingo.


4 posted on 04/25/2010 3:31:44 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

In the olden days they called it the “Hallmark” missile.

“When you care enough to send the Very best”


5 posted on 04/25/2010 3:38:23 AM PDT by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 187)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

So, why are we lickassing arabs for? Demand and get them to sue for peace on our terms. We gonna develop some more super effective weapons, and then let the politicans prevent us from using them, while we wait for the next 9/11??


6 posted on 04/25/2010 4:21:46 AM PDT by Waco (Kalifonia don't need no stenkin oil and no stenkin revenues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco
We gonna develop some more super effective weapons, and then let the politicans prevent us from using them, while we wait for the next 9/11??

No, we're going to "develop some more super effective weapons" so that some crooked politician can sell them to our enemies!

7 posted on 04/25/2010 4:39:45 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: varon

“...so that some crooked politician can sell them to our enemies!”

...so that Obama, like Clinton, can GIVE them to our enemies!


8 posted on 04/25/2010 4:44:03 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
...or given it to hamas or binladen

What makes you think he hasn't given the technology to Hamas or AQ?

9 posted on 04/25/2010 5:03:33 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
obamanation must not have known about this for he surely would have scuttled any tests

Yeeeeeeaaaah... How many more days left?

10 posted on 04/25/2010 5:11:40 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Dead since 12/12/01!
11 posted on 04/25/2010 5:14:38 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: varon
crooked politician

Redundancy Alert!

12 posted on 04/25/2010 5:18:38 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Dale Brown, Dale Brown. Please pick up the white courtesy phone.

The beauty of this platform vs. ICMs is that there is no launch signature.

I hope it has good ASAT/laser countermeasures.


13 posted on 04/25/2010 5:19:58 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

ICMs = ICBMs

We regret the error.


14 posted on 04/25/2010 5:20:24 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

bump


15 posted on 04/25/2010 5:25:24 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

No need for ICBM’s - just sharpen up your old set of Ping’s and let ‘em rip! Faster, cheaper, and apparently legal.


16 posted on 04/25/2010 5:34:39 AM PDT by CTyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

When it absolutely positively needs to be blown up right now!


17 posted on 04/25/2010 5:51:18 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CTyank

LOL. Tungsten-based orbital golf from Hell. The new “Thor” driver set.


18 posted on 04/25/2010 5:54:31 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Hear ya. The biggest problem with launching an ICBM is that it will make a lot of countries (w/nukes) very nervous. Until it is determined where it is really going, things will be very tense.


19 posted on 04/25/2010 6:10:10 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CTyank

It is legal, but very destabilizing since it is a fractional orbit bombardment system. It would be difficult to prove that the system didn’t carry nuclear warheads, so Russia’s perceived margin of error to respond to a potential nuclear attack is reduced from over 30 minutes to less than 5.


20 posted on 04/25/2010 6:26:21 AM PDT by cvetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson