LTC Lakin Formally Charged (Violation of UCMJ Articles 87 & 92)

American Patriot Foundation ^ | 04/22/2010

[BuckeyeTexan]

Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin was charged today with four violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) under Articles 87 and 92.

(Chargesheet at the link in PDF format.)

[thecodont]

And in the US, the greatest dumbing down of the People is largely due to the average American household having 2.24 TELEVISIONS blaring an average of 5.1 hours per day ... day after day, year after year, decade after decade.

The scheming and sinister Socialists could not have created a more efficient tool to spread their LIES to a large segment of the Public who have NO Critical Thinking skills and believe ...

... whatever they are told to believe.

I don't have a working television so I don't get to see this stuff.

Every once in a while I go to a local coffee shop where the TV is on, turned to some network channel.

Therefore I can look at "broadcast" journalism with fresh eyes.

The "news" consists of three major topics:

(1) "President" BO is wonderful;
(2) celebrity scandals; and
(3) human interest stories.

[El Sordo]

Now just where did that come from?

[Lady Jag]

[BP2]

The “news” consists of three major topics:

(1) “President” BO is wonderful;
(2) celebrity scandals; and
(3) human interest stories.

Yep.

Which is EXACTLY why many Americans WON'T hear much about Lt Col Lakin’s case until he is court martialed and sentenced in the very near future. Then the MSM and trolls here will make it sound like a VICTORY for Obama and evidence of his "truthfulness" and Eligibility.

Furthermore, the Public won't likely hear much about Lakin’s subsequent Federal Court Appeals either ... except here on the Internet.

Which expresses the IMPORTANCE that WE continue to spread the TRUTH — while also dispelling the Left's disinformation — on that VERY SAME Medium ... to the maximum extent possible and to as many citizen voters who are still capable of Critical and Rational Thought.

[Non-Sequitur]

Well we’ll see who’s proved right in the end; professionally trained military lawyers or Google trained military lawyer wannabes. I’m betting on the professionals.

[BP2]

> Now just where did that come from?

Do you mean the original, ORIGINAL SOURCE?!

Well, that would be Barack Hussein Obama SR ...

... you know, the British subject.

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

[thecodont]

BO Sr. "I was not an American citizen at my son's birth. I never became an American citizen. I remained a Kenyan."

BO Jr. "I'm his son, and he was not an American citizen when I was born, so I'm NOT a natural-born American citizen."

[BP2]

I’m betting on the professionals.

You may certainly side with those Sophists whose job it is to argue for the OFFICE of the President of the United States (but not necessarily the man sitting there).

However, I'm betting on the Constitution and an active majority of the American public who can still see through Obama's LIES and disinformation.

[Pilsner]

Who are you referring to in your derogatory way - "BIRTHER"?

To all of the deluded, and deranged, Walter Mittys who post drivel about their fantasies of judicially deposing BO, and then preen about how they are patriots, displaying extraordinary bravery, vast historical knowledge, and keen legal insights.

There is a reason no competent attorney, or even mildly incompetent attorney, will touch this stuff. And it is not because all of the other millions of lawyers in the country are Democrats, or afraid, or have been bought off, or lack the keen legal mind of Orly Taitz. There is a reason why the outcome of every Birther lawsuit falls into one of two categories, either lost, or lost and sanctioned for wasting the court's time. And it is not because there is a vast conspiracy.

The reason is that, even if Birthers ever stumbled across competent, admissable, evidence that proved all of their wild speculation, the only outfit that can remove the President from office is Congress. Period. So Birther litigation in the courts is 100% doomed to failure. Always and forever.

Freepers who wants to do something to advance conservatism, as opposed to inflating their egos, and aiding BO, need to get involved in elections. Run for office. Blockwalk for a candidate. Volunteer for the Republican Ballot Security Committee in your area. Take a couple of days off of work and serve a poll watcher during early voting. Volunteer to help the local Republican Get out the Vote (GOTV) Committee, and drive shut ins to the polls on election day. If these committees don't exist where you live, organize them yourself, and get people to help you, or travel to a swing district and work there.

Freepers who want ot help BO can't do better than supporting Birtherism. Lets see, what is the Birther's latest fiasco? Oh yeah, they are asking the United States Army to declare that the guy the Chief Justice swore in, on 20 January 2009, isn't really President, and that the Army doesn't have to follow his orders. That ought to be worth a few hundred thousand votes for the Democrats, as swing voters decide that, however bad the Democrats are, at least they aren't trying to vest ultimate political authority in the military. If Birthers work really hard, they can get that up to a couple of million votes by November, and save 15 or 20 Democrat seats in the House.

[Pilsner]

Americans don’t like to be told to shut up, when their political leaders appear to be acting like criminals and their courts refuse to act justly

I haven't told anyone to shut up. I have pointed out that Birther litigation is not only futile, but counter productive. I have also pointed out that the refusal of the courts to perform an act the Constitution specifically assigns to another branch of government (removing the President from office) is not an injustice, but rather a strict adherence to their duty.

[BP2]

Oh yeah, they are asking the United States Army to declare that the guy the Chief Justice swore in, on 20 January 2009, isn't really President, and that the Army doesn't have to follow his orders.

Whoa.

Are you NOW saying that Roberts and the other Justices have ACTUALLY SEEN a certified copy of Obama's ORIGINAL birth certificate, or just a COPY of Obama's abbreviated shortened "Certification of Live Birth" on their computer monitor ... JUST LIKE YOU.

-OR-

Are you suggesting the SCOTUS had a secret, closed-court session on January 14, 2009 to ONCE AND FOR ALL decide on the Constitutional meaning of "natural-born Citizen" as understood by the Framers?

LOL. Pilsner, once again, you're not making any sense.

[verity]

BP2 hates you because you are a Texan.

[danamco]

The reason is that, even if Birthers ever stumbled across competent, admissable, evidence that proved all of their wild speculation, the only outfit that can remove the President from office is Congress. Period. So Birther litigation in the courts is 100% doomed to failure. Always and forever.

So I take is OK with you that our nation is run besides the rules of the Constitution?

Would you agree that the very first "BIRTHERS" were actually Bill and Hillary Clinton??

Yes, Honduras know how to fix the problem last year with some Spanish lingo; "Cojones." Lastly what office are YOU running for so that we can support you???

[BP2]

> BP2 hates you because you are a Texan.

Naw ... nobody here “hates” you Obama supporters for WHO you are.

But we have great disgust and disdain for those are claim they are a "natural-born Citizen" of the United States ... when they're really NOT.

[verity]

Unbelievable that you were compelled to reply to an obviously spurious contention. LMAO

[BP2]

I have pointed out that Birther litigation is not only futile, but counter productive.

Global Warming is revealed now to be a fraud, too. The MSM and the Left pretends that the East Anglia email scandal didn't happen, and that Global Warming is a FORGONE conclusion ... much like Obama's so-called birth certificate and overall Eligibility status.

Is it okay with you that we fight “Cap and Trade” and Obama’s EPA CO2 regulations?

-OR-

Is that “futile” and “counter productive” to you as well?

You don't ALSO believe Obama's LIES about Global Warming too, do you?

[danamco]

Orly Taitz is apparently the bugle code word for the “lemmings” to come out of the rat holes and spew their traditional cloward/piven diarrhea from the alinsky book!!!

[danamco]

Google trained military lawyer wannabes.

Thank you N-S for posting your own self biography here, LOL!!!

[danamco]

Maybe you should change to O’Doules beer???

[danamco]

Or as the “real” black man in the background, the one with real slave blood in him, is saying in the end of this short video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7qEH-tKoXA