D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility (Britain, Kenya, Indonesia)

WND ^ | 16 APR 2010 | Bob Unruh

[BCW]

WND Exclusive BORN IN THE USA? D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility Contends president's allegiance is to Britain, Kenya, Indonesia Posted: January 29, 2010 12:20 am Eastern By Bob Unruh © 2010 WorldNetDaily A prominent attorney who has shepherded a number of high-profile legal cases challenging Barack Obama'seligibility to be president has brought a "Quo Warranto" case to district court in Washington, D.C., alleging his allegiances have included Britain, Kenya and Indonesia. A Quo Warranto action, first recorded some 800 years ago, essentially is a demand to know by what authority a public figure is acting. The case, brought by California attorney Orly Taitz on behalf of herself, was assigned to Chief Judge Royce Lamberth. Taitz told WND that in a separate action she has filed a notice of appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals of the dismissal of a case she brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes and dozens of other individuals in California challenging Obama's eligibility. She previously attempted Quo Warranto cases on behalf of government officials, without response. This time she filed the action directly with the court on her own behalf. "The case revolves around the federal question of eligibility of the president under Quo Warranto," she wrote.

[philman_36]

However, many birthers say Obama is not President because his father was from Kenya, since a NBC needs to have both parents be Americans.
And generally speaking, most documenters know that a NBC needs two American Citizen parents, not just two American parents.

[LucyT]

Orly Taitz!

The magic words!!

. . . . SP Alert.

[Thanks, danamco.]

-

P.S. Someone on the Ping List (I've forgotten who,) was asking about SvenMagnussen - check out #5 on this thread.]

[algernonpj]

Respecting the constitution is important, but so is respecting the decisions of citizens, states, congress, and the supreme court. Whether you agree with them or not they have made the decision that Obama was qualified.

This sound like it was being said by a Democratic 'talking head'.

The decision of the citizens was made based upon the assumptions Obama had been properly vetted as constitutionally eligible. There were steps along the way where various Democratic political elite directly verified that Obama was eligible, and Republican political elite passively verified Obama was eligible by not questioning and demanding proof.

You are arguing that we as a nation should tolerate an unconstitutional fraud, and abrogate following rule of law.

[Lurking Libertarian]

Obama's First Motion to Dismiss Taitz v. Obama, Quo Warranto, DENIED.

If you read the Order, it saus "denied as moot" --because Taitz had filed an Amended Complaint and Obama filed a second motion to dismiss. The second motion to dismiss has not yet been ruled upon.

[pissant]

Nope. Try again.

[esquirette]

Reading the district attorney’s motion to dismiss, I am glad to see that the judge denied it.

It is full of irrelevant allusions to Orly’s other cases as if those cases were precedent, which they are not, but this is a common smear tactic, designed to impeach the character of the party instead of addressing the merits of the claim.

The real question is, if the executive branch, which is the law enforcement branch, will not enforce the Constitution, then who does have standing, or who does have a true case or controversy?

It is an all or nothing proposition at that point.

The courts - all of them - would be well advised to respect the Constitution before We the People start re-reading the Declaration of Independence instead.

[philman_36]

I wish I could be short and concise like you. I need to work on that. {;^)

[nuke rocketeer]

What???

I got my jollies earlier by poking the virtual wasps nest. It’s something I do when bored.

Rotsa Ruck on the birther stuff. it ain’t gonna work.....

[ml/nj]

I guess you don't want to understand.

Thanks for playing.

ML/NJ

[philman_36]

Think back to my words in reply #35.
I can just see it now. The claim will be "Mr. Dunham was elected even though he wasn't eligible so I should be able to run for POTUS too. A precedent has been set and it must be followed."

...so Obama is President, and that precedence will rule in the future.
Note that Mr Rogers showed up on the thread at reply #36. I doubt if he ever saw that reply of mine.

[bvw]

There have been no legitimate decisions, but there has has been a plenty of libel and innuendo against good citizens under color of office, breach of justice through failure to provide fair hearing to a legitimate complaint, and let’s face it: Twenty First Century Cowardice by the great body of judges and the establishments.

[philman_36]

It’s something I do when bored.
Someone used to come on the WOsD threads when they were bored to rile folks up too...

[ml/nj]

that is what they ruled

Stop with your LIES. They have ruled no such thing.

Who says so? Clarence Thomas says so.

Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7qEH-tKoXA (short video, Listen to him say, "We're evading that," about a minute in.)

ML/NJ

[Las Vegas Ron]

But by law he’s an American citizen. I think you birthers are the shills for the dimmocraps.

Then we're even, Rahm.

[little jeremiah]

Actually, until his actual citizenship status is know by documentation, no one knows for sure what his status is. He could be a non-US citizen, there are several possiblities.

Probably someone has already answered this but just in case they didn’t, here are a couple:

1. If he was born in Kenya and his father is actually 0bama Sr (legally he is the father at this point), then he is not a US citizen unless he got naturalized at some point.

2. Lolo Soetoro adopted him and his US citizenship may have been renounced at that point, so he would not be a US citizen unless he naturalized at some point.

3. He may (most likely did) use a foreign passport after the age of 18 and/or 21, which would be an act of renouncing any US citizenship he may have held at that point.

No evidence has been found that he ever became a naturalized US citizen, so in truth, until his personal documentation is out in the open, all bets are off as to what his legal citizenship status really is.

[little jeremiah]

And you are an ignoramous.

[etraveler13]

Hold On...I doubt his American Citizenship. I think he is an illegal alien.
I think he was born in Mombasa, Kenya
His mother was too young to defer citizenship to Obama, and did not meet US requirement stated many times.
There are eye witnesses to his birth in Mombasa, and a birth certificate on file with the judicial system.
Obama has never refuted any of this evidence and has spent a considerable amount of money to prevent discovery.
What we KNOW is that his father is Kenyan, what we have circumstatial evidence on is that he was adopted and became Indonesian.
You can’t disprove any of it. Many have tried and failed.

[little jeremiah]

Nothing on earth could lower “us” to their level other than joining their marxist, homosexualist, jihad loving thug team.

[butterdezillion]

The Hawaii Department of Health has confirmed, in 2 ways through official communications, that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery, because

1) The Doh has made a statutory admission that Obama’s birth certificate is amended. DOH administrative rules - which were illegally hidden from the public until Nov 2009 - say that any genuine COLB must note any amendments. Since the Factcheck COLB doesn’t, it is known to be a forgery. And

2) Janice Okubo has stated that the certificate numbers were given by the state registrar on the “date filed”. The Factcheck COLB has a “date filed” 3 days earlier than the Nordyke twins’ but a certificate number 2 later than theirs. This discrepancy shows the Factcheck COLB is a forgery.

Because Obama’s birth certificate is amended, Hawaii law (HRS 338-17) says it doesn’t qualify as prima facie evidence. Therefore the best that Hawaii has for Obama only rises to the level of legal hearsay - the same level as the Kenyan birth certificates unless and until they are validated as genuine.

Documentation - including the e-mails from the DOH - found at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/

[Las Vegas Ron]

(short video, Listen to him say, "We're evading that," about a minute in.)

And then they laugh about it.

Absolutely freakin disgusting!