1 posted on
04/15/2010 9:04:17 AM PDT by
julieee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: julieee
To: julieee
That would be the worse possible thing for the GOP.
The worse.
3 posted on
04/15/2010 9:05:37 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Craven spirits wear their master's collars but real men would rather feed the battlefield's vultures)
To: julieee
This thread will get ugly.
4 posted on
04/15/2010 9:05:45 AM PDT by
NautiNurse
(ObamaCare uses Bernie Madoff threory of economics)
To: julieee
That’s one way to not get my vote.
5 posted on
04/15/2010 9:05:51 AM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: julieee
Sorry Sarah but I am not holding my nose this time around. I’ll sit home.
6 posted on
04/15/2010 9:05:56 AM PDT by
avacado
To: julieee
So its gonna be 8 years of Obama?
7 posted on
04/15/2010 9:06:58 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: julieee
8 posted on
04/15/2010 9:07:18 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: julieee
What a disappointment.
First she endorses McKeating, now this.
9 posted on
04/15/2010 9:07:22 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(FYBO: Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: julieee
That’s too bad, guess she’s planning to lose.
To: julieee
Check the video on the Herald web site, she was asked about running with the presumed order Palin/Romney. If she won the nomination and that was what it took to unite the party and beat Obama, it would be the right thing to do. To expect her to dis the possibility of the favorite son candidate as her veep, when she’s in the state, is just ridiculous.
This is manufactured, fake news and everyone should stay calm and collected.
To: julieee
Sounds like a heck of a plan...
To lose with...
To: julieee
Palin/Romney, Romney/Palin = Obama’s second term.
13 posted on
04/15/2010 9:09:49 AM PDT by
brownsfan
(The average American: Uninformed, and unconcerned.)
To: julieee
Palin does not seem to have any Discernment.
15 posted on
04/15/2010 9:10:36 AM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
To: julieee
No she did not. Gov. Palin was being cordial. She will never run with MR. He is a damn liberal. The MR worshipers wish she would run with him.
16 posted on
04/15/2010 9:11:01 AM PDT by
svcw
(Habakkuk 2:3)
To: julieee
No Romney. Either with or without Palin.
17 posted on
04/15/2010 9:11:21 AM PDT by
Darren McCarty
(I don't look for leaders. I follow my own path, my way.)
To: julieee
And what do veeps do? Only what the president allows them to.
18 posted on
04/15/2010 9:11:48 AM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: julieee
Only if Sarah heads the ticket.
19 posted on
04/15/2010 9:12:32 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: svcw
Well, the bash Gov. Palin people are out in full force. MR is a liberal, he can run as a dem and win. MR will never win the Republican primary.
20 posted on
04/15/2010 9:12:53 AM PDT by
svcw
(Habakkuk 2:3)
To: julieee
Never forget the Willard Myth Romney care, $50 copay
for the planned murder of the most helpless!
27 posted on
04/15/2010 9:14:43 AM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
To: julieee
This makes me sick. They don’t even care what the people want and it’s not Romney.
29 posted on
04/15/2010 9:14:56 AM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
