Posted on 04/13/2010 8:19:14 AM PDT by Man50D
Washington, D.C., April 13, 2010. Army doctor Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin yesterday met with his brigade commander, Col. Gordon R. Roberts, who proceeded to read LTC Lakin his Miranda rights, and who informed LTC Lakin he had the right to remain silent because LTC Lakin is about to be charged with serious crimes. Col. Roberts was at age 19 awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the only recipient of the nations highest honor currently on active duty in the Army.
LTC Lakin had previously been ordered in writing to report yesterday to Ft. Campbell, KY and then on to deploy for his second tour of duty in Afghanistan. Lakin refused to obey these orders and instead came to work yesterday morning at the Pentagon. Late yesterday afternoon he was confronted by his brigade commander.
Before the meeting was over, LTC Lakins Pentagon Access Pass had been revoked, and his laptop computer was set to be confiscated.
The message to LTC Lakin is clear; through official channels, he was informed yesterday that he will shortly be court-martialled for crimes (specifically, missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer) that for others has led to lengthy imprisonment at hard labor.
Lakin has announced in a YouTube video that has now been viewed more than 110,000 times that he considers it his duty to refuse to obey orders that would be illegal if President Obama is ineligible to hold office.
Meanwhile, cries mount for proof of that eligibility, but nothing has been forthcoming. The Obama campaign at one point released a copy of computer-generated abstract of information purportedly in Hawaii's records system, but the source of this information is unclear and need not have been a birth certificate issued contemporaneously and signed by the doctor who attended the birth. Even the document released was only a copy, and the version printed in the Los Angeles Times on June 16, 2008 is on a form only in use since late 2001. Even as it is, the document contains a warning that it is merely prima facie--threshold, rebuttable and thus inconclusive --evidence of birth, and the copy the Times printed mysteriously has the certificate number blacked out, thereby rendering the document unusable according to language on the bottom.
Given the seriousness of the offenses with which LTC Lakin is about to be charged, the American Patriot Foundation today renewed its plea for donations to its legal defense fund for LTC Lakin. Details are available at APF's website, www.safeguardourconstitution.com
What?! And be accused of TRYING TO GET HIM BANNED?!
Are you bored? What is with this silly exchange?
I hope your day gets brighter.
hedgetrimmer wrote:
Its my understanding that the National Park Service undertakes to make a monument out of a presidents birth place pretty much as soon as they take office in their first term.
(putting on my psychic hat) I'm sure hedgetrimmer appreciates your research.
Grasping at straws here hon. Which hospital was Obama born in? Kapiolani? Queens? Which one, and if you can name it prove it because its been documented that Obama has claimed to be born at both.
I don't think Obama has ever claimed he was born anywhere but Kapiolani but perhaps you can find otherwise and post a link.
I bow to your superior psychic abilities.
These threads get hot. When one runs out of "facts", the name-calling starts. Too bad but it's human nature.
Humorous. Pointless but humorous.
Daily News has an online poll about Lakin. Poll shows 50 percent believe this is settled. 34 percent believe it is not settled, and Obama should show his Kenyan BC. Hmmm ... 34 percent ... one-third. And ironically, Benjamin Franklin was called crazy by his critics, too.
At the outset of the Revolutionary War:
- one-third of the public were Patriots, proclaiming the Declaration of Independence on
- one-third of the public were Tories, loyal to the King and the yoke of Government control (Patriot Nathan Hale's own Tory cousin Samuel Hale exposed him, leading to Hale's capture and hanging by the British in NY on September 22, 1776)
- one-third were along for the ride! (today's independents, who drift from Left to Right)
|
Don't know will have to ask him! And you don't need a psychic hat to understand that birthplaces of a President are a big deal. Every single one (except Obama) is commemorated in some way or another - whether that be a plaque, a monument, or name change honoring that President or his family, or an information packet, or it becomes a tourist site.
I don't think Obama has ever claimed he was born anywhere but Kapiolani but perhaps you can find otherwise and post a link.
How about more than one?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103306
So now, since Bush 43's hospital place of birth provides an information packet which describes the distinguished reputation and career of Barbara Bush's personal obstetrician, where is Obama's????
You just glossed over and didn't bother to answer my questions:
Which hospital was Obama born in? Kapiolani or Queens Medical Center? Which one?
Since you claim Obama was ONLY born in Kapiolani then you should know where HIS information packet is. Please post the details in this packet as exists for George W. Bush describing the distinquished and honorable career of Ann Dunham's personal obstetrician. WE WOULD ALL LIKE TO KNOW THE NAME OF THAT PHYSICIAN!!!!! If no information packet exists at Kapioloani - WHY NOT?????
What about the remaining 16%?
Obviously they're still unsure about Obama.
You can fool some of the people some of the time ...
I bow to your superior psychic abilities. Deary, the only bowing we here can see you doing is to the Swami Obami ...
neither Respect nor TRUST their CinC ?! |
LOL, good one!
Well you know what they say, “If you don’t have a spine, all you can do is bend!”
Army to court martial 'birther' officer; Refuses to deploy, considers orders from Obama void...
VIDEO [Lakin statement]
Whoever Lakin’s lawyer is, they need to start working this issue in the press. Courageous career office expected to show long-form birth certificate when commander in chief insists on hiding his own. Then they need to show American what some real long-form birth certificates look like such as Miki Booth’s family and the Nordyke twins and ask why Obama, the pledger of transparency, can’t practice what he preaches. Next they need to hammer home that a 14th amendment citizen, as Obama claims, is not a natural born citizen, and that the children of British subjects, like Obama are also not considered to be natural born subjects.
New thread on Drudge headline
Army to court martial ‘birther’ officer (Drudge)
Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:41:47 AM · by cycle of discernment
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2492851/posts
the Constitutionly-uneducated masses are calling...
“HELP us understand this ‘birther’ thing.”
Sadly, the uneducated masses are turning a blind eye to obvious abuse of the Constitution. It requires one to be born in the country of citizen parents. As such, Obama fails to meet the eligibility requirement. It’s that simple.
<>But hes still a British subject per the British Nationality Act, isnt he???<>
<>No.<>
Oh really — here it is directly from from the Obama website itself [Factcheck]:
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children:
“British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.
“In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”
and more here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/british-law-declares-obama-a-british-citizen/
[Warning: there are facts therein that may be harmful to your preconceived misconceptions and prefabricated dissemblings. Read at the risk of your Obama stimulus money]
“Sadly, the uneducated masses are turning a blind eye...”
Curiosity and doubt about BHO’s eligibility has been building.
~~~~~~~~~
When asked if they consider Obama a “legitimate president,” 32.6 percent said no, and another 15.8 percent said they were not sure. Barely half of the voters, 51.5 percent said they do consider Obama a legitimate president even though he has yet to produce a long-form birth certificate that would prove he was born in the U.S.
Even 14.6 percent of the Democrats said they do not consider him a legitimate president, along with 52.2 percent of the Republicans. Significantly, 31.8 percent of the independents said no.
Those who were uncertain included 12.1 percent of the Democrats, 21.3 percent of the Republicans and 14.3 percent of the independents.
Also, asked whether they were more or less likely to believe in Obama’s legitimacy, only 40.1 percent said much more. Some 27.9 percent said much less, with a significant 12 percent unsure.
“A lingering doubt about his legitimacy as president continues to dog Obama,” Wenzel said. “Barely half 52 percent said they believe that, in light of the fact he has not yet presented a long-form birth certificate that would prove he was born on U.S. soil, while 33 percent said they do not consider him to be a legitimate president. Another 16 percent were unsure on the question. While some try to marginalize those who continue to call for Obama to release his birth certificate, it is clear many don’t think this is a settled matter.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=122525
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.