Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glenn Beck: ‘Mitt Romney Could Be The Only Guy That Could Win’ In 2012
Mediate.com ^ | April 8th, 2010 | Frances Martel

Posted on 04/08/2010 2:32:54 PM PDT by iowamark

Glenn Beck and radio pals Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere rattled down the list of potential Republican nominees for President in 2012 this morning, and they had some bad news for the Tea Party movement: Sarah Palin probably won’t run, Ron Paul is still and long shot, and Mitt Romney, as of now, is the GOP’s best bet.

While Gray and Burguiere are harsh to most of the candidates, Beck spreads the love around. He tells his co-hosts that he likes Palin but doesn’t think she will run, Bobby Jindal but doesn’t think he has the charisma, and Congressman Paul but doesn’t think America is ready for him. Then, at the bottom of the pile, he finds Mitt Romney:

"I have to tell you that Mitt Romney could be the only guy that could win, and I don’t know if he could because I think that Americans are going to be I mean, this country is going to be in deep trouble by 2012, and the next term, if it’s not decided this term, the next term will decide our fate. Then I hope that Americans are ready for an adult and are ready for hard news."

It’s a strange, possibly sad conclusion from someone who had called Romney out for “flirting with socialism,” but ultimately Beck was trying to determine who could win, not who he thought should. If Beck was playing process of elimination, which he clearly was, it’s hard to refute his conclusion that Romney is the least likely candidate to crash and burn in a general election, if only for being a conservative from the most liberal state of America and having moderate successes like universal health care under his belt. Or– and this one is for you conspiracy theorists out there– maybe Beck is intentionally downplaying the Republican candidates’ ability to success so as to clear the brush and become the reluctant right-wing candidate by default. After all, he is the second-most popular human being in America. (Link to a Harris poll: Glenn Beck is the second most popular television personality in America… second only to Oprah Winfrey.)

Listen to the segment below:


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; 2012gopprimary; anchorbabies; anchorbaby; backstabbers4romney; beck; bobbyjindal; carpetbaggerromney; dnc4romney; fnc; fourteenthamendment; glaad; glennbeck; inman; lds; logcabinrepublican; logcabinrepublicans; mittromney; mittromneycare; mormon; rino4romney; romney; romney2012; romney4obama; romneycare; sarahpalin; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 661-676 next last
To: iowamark

I haven’t seen any signs that Mitt is cleaning up his act. I still don’t trust his plastic principles.


141 posted on 04/08/2010 3:24:37 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpin
Daniels is a strong fiscal conservative and a middle of the road social conservative. Not the most exciting guy in the world.
142 posted on 04/08/2010 3:25:20 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

I guarantee that Beck will become more (not less) supportive of Romney as time goes on.

He has to, it’s part of his faith. Romney is LDS ‘royalty’ and Beck is a ‘lowly convert’. The LDS but ‘the Chruch’ (not Christ) before EVERYTHING.

Been there, done that.


143 posted on 04/08/2010 3:25:37 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name; mrreaganaut

Don’t watch Beck - so does he consider himself a conservative?

- - - - - -
I think he considers himself conservative, but in principle he is much more of a libertarian.

MrR would know more than I on this one.


144 posted on 04/08/2010 3:27:12 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TChris

Ron Paul is not, and never has been a real candidate, so that reinforces my point.

Beck dismissed Palin and then went to the “adult’ with the “hard news”, Mitt Romney.

Beck pushed Mitt as though there were no other people in the GOP, including a couple of frontrunners that sometimes beat and always challenge Romney in various polls as they move around in the top three.


145 posted on 04/08/2010 3:27:40 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

Mittens couldn’t beat Juan McAmnesty back in ‘08. Beck is all wet here.

- - - - - - -
I would bet that Beck believes that Romeny winning the nom would be the ‘will of God’ and fulfillment of LDS prophecy.

Not kidding.


146 posted on 04/08/2010 3:28:24 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TChris

“Hey, people, at this point I only see Romney making a serious effort. Is anyone else going to try?”

It doesn’t matter how hard he tries. He won’t be nominated and if Beck doesn’t know this, he is CLUELESS.

Furthermore, he does not know whether Palin will run. All the signs point to her being a candidate.

He spent three minutes (of the five minute clip) talking about Newt and Jindal, neither of whom is serious. He spent 13 seconds on Palin concluding, based on nothing, that Sarah Palin did not want to be President. Then he concludes (again based on nothing) that Mitt Romney may be the only one who could win. I never listen to him because I think he is a loon and a friend of the pompous O’Reilly. If I listen to any of them, it i limited to Rush and Levin, who have original thoughts and back their positions up with facts.

Beck flunks on both counts.


147 posted on 04/08/2010 3:29:05 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads (Politico and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Terpin

You keep throwing his name out there and we conservatives keep pointing out that he is not conservative.


148 posted on 04/08/2010 3:29:28 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Truth is a Weapon

Would you come to that same conclusion if they were both evangelicals? That’s a rhetorical question of course.


149 posted on 04/08/2010 3:30:14 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

I forgot. He also spent more time talking about Ron Paul and how much he agrees with him. LOL


150 posted on 04/08/2010 3:30:42 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads (Politico and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Why possibly would you have the strong, charismatic and seasoned leader in Palin run number two to Jindal—who isn’t natural born, BTW? Jindal couldn’t win the primaries unless he already had Palin attached to his hip and I just don’t see the point. Would he have his VP give all of his state of the union speeches? Handle his press conferences? Do his media interviews?

Well, you gotta admit, she'd be kept busy. I like Jindal because he shares my belief system (and to my knowledge thus far, he is True to his faith), and he is brilliant. I like Sarah because she gets people all charged up (and she is a true American). I see them fitting together pretty well, however, I can also see Jindal with Bachmann. Just an opinion.
151 posted on 04/08/2010 3:30:59 PM PDT by mlizzy ("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: NCBraveheart
I just wonder, if Romney gets the GOP nod what will you do then?

In November of this year's election, we have here in Illinois, the most liberal candidate ever as the republican nominee, he makes Romney look down right conservative. I will never vote for either of them.

152 posted on 04/08/2010 3:32:08 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Which one of my "screechy" statements was false? {snicker}

Pretty much all of them. And I see you are allowing some flexibility and being a little more polite with other posters who feel the same way I do. You wouldn't be holding some grudge or something, would you? ;-)

It's embarrassing to be called out on a claim you can't back up, isn't it?

It must be. You would know. Is that why you act the way you do?

153 posted on 04/08/2010 3:34:18 PM PDT by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
My guess is that when it comes down to the final decision about running, Sarah Palin will decide that no one else has the courage to turn back the clock and undo the damage Obama has done.

She already has 80,000 Team Sarah members ready to take to the streets and 1.5 million Facebook fans. She could raise $100MM very quickly.

Her strongest ad can be clips from the 2008 campaign - all the bad things she predicted Obama will do that he will have done by 2008.

154 posted on 04/08/2010 3:34:48 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
What I do see it as, is Beck positioning himself to miss the next train to the promised land.

If Beck is a believer in his own religion, he believes that he will be god of his own planet some day.

155 posted on 04/08/2010 3:34:52 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Or he may NOT be...

One or the other, that's for sure :-)

156 posted on 04/08/2010 3:35:33 PM PDT by T Minus Four (Abortion: one dead, one wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

She sure would! I don’t doubt but that Jindal’s a decent guy, but he would belong in Palin’s cabinet, not being propped up by her. If he’s not interested in that, he could switch over to the US Senate when he wants something new—and be a fine Senator.

And don’t buy into Palin’s somehow being stupid, thus needing the ‘brilliant’ running mate to make up for her weak intellect.


157 posted on 04/08/2010 3:35:36 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Yeah, sure. Romney couldn't even beat McCain ...


158 posted on 04/08/2010 3:36:13 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrrod

I disagree with Beck.

Romney would never appeal to the tea party, hence he couldn’t win the nomination.

If the Republican Party forced Romney upon us, much like it did with McCain, I guarantee there would be a Major Third Party candidate, and the relegating of the Republican Party to being even more insignificant.


159 posted on 04/08/2010 3:36:21 PM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

hey! me too! LOL.

Oh wait, it already is...well, THAT was easy.


160 posted on 04/08/2010 3:36:34 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 661-676 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson