Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do-gooders now want to 'save the children' and ban porn
iTWire ^ | April 5, 2010 | Alex Zaharov-Reutt

Posted on 04/04/2010 8:35:19 PM PDT by myknowledge

Oh God, here we go again, righteous types trying to tell free-thinking, law-abiding people what to do with their lives, are now on a campaign to ban porn magazines and lads mags from the newsagents, petrol stations and shops they’ve been in for years to “save the children”.

OPINION: Watch out, Playboy, Penthouse, People, The Picture, Zoo, Ralph, Post and other such publications, a group of academics, child experts, TV stars and more have written to the Australian Attorneys-General effectively demanding they do something about these types of magazines in stores.

They want them restricted to adults-only premises, which just like the proposed Australian Internet filter doesn’t actually deal with the “problem” but shuts them out from view, making them more attractive in a way that all bans end up doing.

(Excerpt) Read more at itwire.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dogooderlibs; moralabsolutes; porn; pornban; pornmagazines; pornography; savethechildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
Although hardcore porn magazines don't appeal to FRiends like us, the narcissistic do-gooder power control libs want us not to have porn.

What do you think?

1 posted on 04/04/2010 8:35:19 PM PDT by myknowledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." ~ Ben Franklin

Pornography has done more to harm the cause of liberty than any liberal welfare policy.

2 posted on 04/04/2010 8:40:22 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege (When I survey the wondrous cross...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
a campaign to ban porn magazines

There's still porn magazines?

3 posted on 04/04/2010 8:41:39 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge; Eric Blair 2084; GOP_Lady

When pr0n is outlawed, only outlaws will see beaver pictures!


4 posted on 04/04/2010 8:41:49 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I am Ellie Light. I hate slow drivers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0q_VGacfNk


5 posted on 04/04/2010 8:43:58 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
When pr0n is outlawed, only outlaws will see beaver pictures!


6 posted on 04/04/2010 8:44:50 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo (Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Our greatest threat to liberty appears, to me, to be the radical Marxists in the White House, not Larry Flynt.


7 posted on 04/04/2010 8:45:57 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I am Ellie Light. I hate slow drivers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

Wait, wait, wait.

These are the same do-gooders who are Pro-Abortion? The same do-gooders who want to kill disabled children “for the good of the community and to cut medical costs for the rest of us?” These are the same do-gooders who promote the gay/lesbian/transgender life-style and the adoption of children by same? These are the do-gooders who won’t allow prayer in our Schools or our Legislatures or any “public” meeting? These are the do-gooders who believe “sex before 8 or it’s too late?”

THOSE do-gooders?

I have a suggestion for where those do-gooders can go. But I don’t want to be banned from FR for life.


8 posted on 04/04/2010 8:46:06 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (SPEAK UP REPUBLICANS, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU YET! IMPEACH OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
I have mixed feelings about it. The internet gives young people access to all types of porn that are more graphic that the Playboy magazines I used to sneak a peek at as a youth decades ago. It’s even easy to accidentally come across. For, example, I was planning on a trip to SoCal a few years back and discovered California Angels is a prom site.

I am not certain what effect porn has on child molesters.

9 posted on 04/04/2010 8:46:26 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

Ironic, since it was the very same social justice do-gooders who wanted to legalize it back in the sixties.

Live long enough, see everything. The wheel goes ‘round and ‘round.


10 posted on 04/04/2010 8:46:37 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated
I have a suggestion for where those do-gooders can go.

California?

11 posted on 04/04/2010 8:46:43 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo (Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
> What do you think?

I think the damned blue-noses should dry up and blow away. Their only goal is control and/or sanitizing and/or destruction of anything they don't personally like.

I don't personally have any use for porn, especially the hard-core variety (although I enjoy racy-but-tasteful girlie photos as much as any red-blooded American male).

I also don't have any use for corsets, but does that mean I should want to ban them?

If you allow people to control what you can and can't read, you will soon find they want to control what you can and can't think.

None of us want to see America go down that road.

12 posted on 04/04/2010 8:47:01 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
I'd be more worried about k-12 'sex education' which portrays all that GLBT? stuff as 'normal'. Put baby making back in 10th grade biology/health class.
13 posted on 04/04/2010 8:47:37 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

That’s true. It’s soul-shattering poison. And it’s pure evil.

But free men must reject it on their own. There’s no virtue in having a central authority remove the temptation for us.

That being said, society has every right to keep it out of the public view. People who choose not to consume pornography should not be forced to see it in public areas.


14 posted on 04/04/2010 8:49:17 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
do-gooder power control libs want us not to have porn.

The libs dont want you to have porn? huh?

As a proud "Do-Gooder"... I will bring up your porno concerns at our next Do-Gooder global conspiracy meeting.

15 posted on 04/04/2010 8:49:48 PM PDT by GregoTX (I am the resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ping


16 posted on 04/04/2010 8:51:02 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

All I know is, I feel sorry for anyone who doesn’t get Playboy for the articles. That is all the magazine is.


17 posted on 04/04/2010 8:51:14 PM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
Throughout history, all societies have had their forms of corruption, be it drugs, prostitution, licquor and porn. The best that can be done is to segregate and separate corruption from polite society. Corruption cannot be done away with, people will find a way to meet their "needs".

The free market seems to be working today. When I go to a national chain store (excluding book stores) I don't have to be worried that my kids will be exposed to objectionable material. I can choose not to go to the movies. There are plenty of family friendly venues, and there are a few porn friendly venues for those who have the need.

The internet is not quite as well defined. Parents probably need to be more involved in what is being viewed on their computer, but more importantly, ISPs could develop a family friendly network if the market dictated it.

18 posted on 04/04/2010 8:51:21 PM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

“Petrol Stations”... the UK?


19 posted on 04/04/2010 8:52:17 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

By attracting the clumsy ministrations of the well-intentioned?


20 posted on 04/04/2010 8:52:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson