Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Waxman’s Vendetta (hitting critics with congressional subpoenas)
National Review ^ | March 30, 2010 12:00 A.M. | Rich Lowry

Posted on 03/30/2010 7:40:19 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

Henry Waxman is peeved. He expects corporate America to swallow health-care reform without a peep of protest — and, apparently, without revealing new costs to shareholders or the Securities and Exchange Commission....He has called the CEOs of AT&T, Caterpillar, and Deere to testify before his committee, accompanying his summons with a far-reaching document request lest the corporations miss the point: This is naked political harassment.

(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; critics; democrats; liberalfascism; obamacare; subpoena; waxman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2010 7:40:19 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

.
Here’s a question for the legal FReepes. Can the target of A Congressional subpoena obtain a court order to have the subpoena quashed?


2 posted on 03/30/2010 7:41:48 PM PDT by Touch Not the Cat (Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

He better schedule a big room. There are a lot of companies releasing those charges.


3 posted on 03/30/2010 7:43:39 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Alan Colmes on Hannity was complaining these companies didn’t oppose Obamacare during the debate on the bill

1 All the more reason their financial reports are credible.

2 If the democrats had held a single HEARING with witnesses who would be affected by Obamacare, then maybe we would have learned all this stuff in advance.


4 posted on 03/30/2010 7:44:11 PM PDT by Williams (It's the policies, stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Did that little weenie Waxman get beat up on the playground when he was a kid?
5 posted on 03/30/2010 7:44:39 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Obamunism, the fatal cure for Bush Derangement Syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Yeah, but he liked it.


6 posted on 03/30/2010 7:45:15 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Williams

According to Nancy, the bill needed to be passed before it could have been scored by these companies because we needed to ‘know what’s in it’!

The ceo’s should just respond ‘Facts are facts’ when asked about the damaging data in their REQUIRED reports.


7 posted on 03/30/2010 7:50:09 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

The mob is at it again...First they target the bonuses and give out addresses and now this....They are Nazi thugs...


8 posted on 03/30/2010 7:50:45 PM PDT by hstacey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I’m fairly certain that these companies are following the prescribed accounting rules as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation that grew out of the Enron scandal. I think the CEO’s ought to release their calculations to the media (like the wall Street Journal or Investors Business Daily, not the NY Times or Washington Post) before Nostrils-Dumbass has a chance to cherry-pick the questions and cut the responses off on the stand.


9 posted on 03/30/2010 7:50:56 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Barack Obama: Government:: Bernie Madoff: Finance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Had they pointed out the insanity during the process of cramming the bill, there would have been a bandaid applied, and the punishment would have been meted out to the companies.


10 posted on 03/30/2010 7:52:14 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Alan Colmes on Hannity was complaining these companies didn’t oppose Obamacare during the debate on the bill

Nobody knew what was in the bill!

11 posted on 03/30/2010 7:56:53 PM PDT by Clock King (There's no way to fix D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat

Interesting question, can’t wait to see the answer.

I know that if you ignore a Congressional subpoena you can be held in contempt of Congress. For whatever that is worth.


12 posted on 03/30/2010 7:57:21 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Williams

“Alan Colmes on Hannity was complaining these companies didn’t oppose Obamacare during the debate on the bill...”

And I’m sure Sean didn’t even think to ask the bug-eyed liberal moron HOW companies were supposed to know what was in the bill in order to oppose it... did he?


13 posted on 03/30/2010 8:02:08 PM PDT by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

This is just the start!!!

AT&T figures it will cost them one billion per month and in the San Diego Coounty area they are laying off 5,000 people!


14 posted on 03/30/2010 8:04:49 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

I would be honored to be held in contempt of a comtemptible congress(with some excections).


15 posted on 03/30/2010 8:05:26 PM PDT by cfrels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“Fascism” is such an ugly word.

We prefer “serving the public.” :)


16 posted on 03/30/2010 8:06:27 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat

no, but it is also hard for Congress to enforce laws.


17 posted on 03/30/2010 8:07:02 PM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I hope that they would all walk into the room and claim the 5th and walk out.

I know they won’t but one can always hope.


18 posted on 03/30/2010 8:07:51 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

“held in contempt of Congress.” Who cares? How about the American peoples Contempt of this democratic congress and this commie administration!!!”For whatever that is worth.” In November these dummies will find out what it is worth!


19 posted on 03/30/2010 8:08:15 PM PDT by Colorado Cowgirl (God bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Waxman maintains his interest is ensuring the bill “does not have unintended consequences.”

Snort! EVERYTHING Congress does has unintended consequences.

20 posted on 03/30/2010 8:13:27 PM PDT by shezza (God bless America, land that I love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson