Government can regulate priviliges such as driving, but they cannot govern the most basic of human rights as bestowed upon us by our creator - and acknowledged in our Constitution - to LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT of happiness.
The argument the Obama Administration is going to make won't compare automobile insurance to health insurance. They know that's a false argument.
Rather, they will argue that the Federal Government has the right by conscription to act in the national best interest, which in this case would be health care. They're preparing to argue that the Federal Government has the right through conscription to act in the national interest whether it's sending men to war, or forcing them to buy health insurance.
That's the argument they're going to make, and I say this confidently because Obama back in 2001 on National Public Radio said as much when he said and I quote:
The Constitution specifies what the Government cannot do to you. The Constitution does not specify what Government must do for you on your behalf. It's very simple: Obama believes that the Government must mandate people to do specific, certain things in the "National Interest" as a back-door to his plan for "social justice."
Just look at what he's doing and ask yourself who benefits the most from what he's doing? C'mon, everyone knows the answer even if they're afraid to say it.
If you have enough property or know someone who does you can drive your car on it all you want without insurance, registration or even a license and there's nothing any government can do.
Like wise, if you (are going) see a private doctor it should be none of the government's business what your insurance situation is.
Plus, if I don’t own a car I don’t need the insurance
bump