Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Pass a Constitutional Amendment!
The Constitutional | March 22, 2009 | My Keyboard

Posted on 03/22/2010 6:49:38 PM PDT by Irisshlass

38 States have legislation drawn up, a couple States have already passed it to block the forced healthcare upon their states. It takes 38 states to pass a Constitutional Ammendment. And it seems that this is the key to stop these socialist communists from taking over our country once and for all.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 26thamendment; amendment; civilwar2; communism; constitution; fascism; impeachobama; nationalvoterid; obamacare; twentysixthamendment; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2010 6:49:38 PM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

...it also has to pass with the 2/3 of the House/Senate. Fat chance.


2 posted on 03/22/2010 6:51:34 PM PDT by americanophile (DeMint/Ryan '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

The Constitutional Amendment Process

The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. After Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is charged with responsibility for administering the ratification process under the provisions of 1 U.S.C. 106b. The Archivist has delegated many of the ministerial duties associated with this function to the Director of the Federal Register. Neither Article V of the Constitution nor section 106b describe the ratification process in detail. The Archivist and the Director of the Federal Register follow procedures and customs established by the Secretary of State, who performed these duties until 1950, and the Administrator of General Services, who served in this capacity until NARA assumed responsibility as an independent agency in 1985.

The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention. The Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution. Since the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval. The original document is forwarded directly to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishes it in slip law format. The OFR also assembles an information package for the States which includes formal "red-line" copies of the joint resolution, copies of the joint resolution in slip law format, and the statutory procedure for ratification under 1 U.S.C. 106b.

The Archivist submits the proposed amendment to the States for their consideration by sending a letter of notification to each Governor along with the informational material prepared by the OFR. The Governors then formally submit the amendment to their State legislatures. In the past, some State legislatures have not waited to receive official notice before taking action on a proposed amendment. When a State ratifies a proposed amendment, it sends the Archivist an original or certified copy of the State action, which is immediately conveyed to the Director of the Federal Register. The OFR examines ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. If the documents are found to be in good order, the Director acknowledges receipt and maintains custody of them. The OFR retains these documents until an amendment is adopted or fails, and then transfers the records to the National Archives for preservation.

A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 of 50 States). When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice to the Congress and to the Nation that the amendment process has been completed.

In a few instances, States have sent official documents to NARA to record the rejection of an amendment or the rescission of a prior ratification. The Archivist does not make any substantive determinations as to the validity of State ratification actions, but it has been established that the Archivist's certification of the facial legal sufficiency of ratification documents is final and conclusive.

In recent history, the signing of the certification has become a ceremonial function attended by various dignitaries, which may include the President. President Johnson signed the certifications for the 24th and 25th Amendments as a witness, and President Nixon similarly witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment along with three young scholars. On May 18, 1992, the Archivist performed the duties of the certifying official for the first time to recognize the ratification of the 27th Amendment, and the Director of the Federal Register signed the certification as a witness.

3 posted on 03/22/2010 6:51:59 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

This is the surest way. But it would be a long hard fight.


4 posted on 03/22/2010 6:52:26 PM PDT by outofstyle (Anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

This is NOT the time to open the Constitution up to tampering by the current WDC membership.

They would find a way to disembowl every freedom contained therein.


5 posted on 03/22/2010 6:52:28 PM PDT by G Larry (DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

oathkeepers.org


6 posted on 03/22/2010 6:52:48 PM PDT by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

I know you’re mad, this will never happen.


7 posted on 03/22/2010 6:52:55 PM PDT by Indy Pendance (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
RIGHT ON!!!!

We can call it the Freedom from Medical Socialism Amendment!

8 posted on 03/22/2010 6:53:16 PM PDT by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

AND.., I would not advise going the route of a “Constitutional Convention” either... so don’t try to propose that kind of a methodology... there are too many Democrats around to even think of trying a Constitutional Convention... :-)


9 posted on 03/22/2010 6:53:18 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Agreed...


10 posted on 03/22/2010 6:53:49 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: outofstyle

It isn’t and could be futile. But it’s still a very smart idea.


11 posted on 03/22/2010 6:54:51 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

Right on brothaman! Slap me some skin!


12 posted on 03/22/2010 6:54:58 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Islam is incompatible with American traditions and values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

The socialists are already ignoring the Constitution. They simply will ignore any new Amendment as they do the Constitution as a whole. Passing an amendment is a tacit signal we have failed to defend the Constitution as written. Instead we need to stand firm defending Constitution as written by defeating the socialists.


13 posted on 03/22/2010 6:55:26 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

If the States ever did convene a Constitutional Convention it would probably be an ugly scene.


14 posted on 03/22/2010 6:55:50 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

not required if initiated by the states. would also like to see the number of Supreme Court justices limited to 9 to prevent stacking of the court.


15 posted on 03/22/2010 6:55:51 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More (The only thing standing between us and complete victory over the evildoers is POLITICS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

This will never happen
I THOUGHT WE WOULD NEVER HAVE A MUSLIM COMMUNIST PRESIDENT EITHER.


16 posted on 03/22/2010 6:56:15 PM PDT by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

That won’t be a problem this fall the time the American people get finished!


17 posted on 03/22/2010 6:56:50 PM PDT by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

2/3 may be possible after 11/10


18 posted on 03/22/2010 6:57:03 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Nothing to see here. Move along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

That is the way almost all existing amendments have been passed, but isn’t there another way, not yet used, which allows it to be done by the state legislatures cutting Congress completely out of the loop?


19 posted on 03/22/2010 6:57:34 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

Does anyone have a link to the House bill? Thanks.


20 posted on 03/22/2010 6:57:36 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson