Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A doctor's perpective of Obamacare - Healthcare delivery bankruptcy Please read
Real Life | schwingdoc

Posted on 03/20/2010 12:33:54 AM PDT by schwingdoc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2010 12:33:54 AM PDT by schwingdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

Makes very valid and extremely scary points. Is this the crisis?


2 posted on 03/20/2010 12:45:24 AM PDT by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

Bump.


3 posted on 03/20/2010 12:45:25 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

interesting


4 posted on 03/20/2010 12:48:51 AM PDT by pandoraou812 (timendi causa est nescire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

Thank you.


5 posted on 03/20/2010 12:57:03 AM PDT by chichipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

Bump for later reading and posting elsewhere...


6 posted on 03/20/2010 12:57:46 AM PDT by The Chief (Volunteer Fire Fighter since 1989, 20+ years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

bttt


7 posted on 03/20/2010 1:07:22 AM PDT by Mama Shawna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Chief

When people realize that we have been subjected to one after another manufactured crisis they ARE NOT going to be very happy at all!


8 posted on 03/20/2010 1:10:40 AM PDT by A. Morgan (ZER0 is a BIG LIAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

Excellent, my brother. Says it all. Wish I wrote it.


9 posted on 03/20/2010 1:12:35 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Let tyrants shake their iron rod, and slavery clank her galling chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

Your analysis is as cogent, as predictive, as anything I have read these several months. And I have gone back to read your previous posts. In a word, thank you, Doc, for all that you bring to this national discussion. I will send your post wherever I can.


10 posted on 03/20/2010 1:15:16 AM PDT by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc
And, entirely apart from the destruction of everything we have worked our whole lives for (I just passed the point of doing this for half of my life) - to have a Congress capable of such a work of destruction is so revolutionary! Usually they can skate past the destructive effects of what they have done.

Not this time.

11 posted on 03/20/2010 1:15:24 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Let tyrants shake their iron rod, and slavery clank her galling chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

This govt takover of so much of the US economy (artificial, unsustainable ecomomy) should finally topple our country into martial law and a police state. No elections, massive layoffs of govt workers that maintain the public infrastructure, empty professional and commercial real estate, empty homes as we move into cheap apartments and tents, no proper refuse handlling, widespread preventable illness, then desease...Well done, socialists.

Funny thing is, most of the voters that put these representatives that are trying to execute this govt takover into office are not really evil, just incredibly igonorant.


12 posted on 03/20/2010 1:23:09 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (A "tea bagger"? Say it to my face. ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc
Most of what you stated above was so obvious to most members of this website it does not need to be rehashed.

Some of us were warning of the dire consequences of government involvement in healthcare via the case of Terri Schiavo.
Perhaps you remember her government court ordered “murder/execution” via forced starvation and dehydration?
If anyone but “the government” did that to a death row inmate, a POW, or a stray dog or cat, they would have been charged with any number of “inhumane” anti-cruelety laws.
Lots of us folks with no monetary interest, fought hard to save her, and we lost.
I see you logged on here well after her death.
Just curious...what was your stand in her case?

Obviously you don't have to answer me.

Hopefully you will start thinking about it.

Her palliative health care expenses was supposed to have been “fully paid for” in advance, yet our entire health provider industry seemed almost to be frothing at the mouth,in thirsting for her death.

Pardon me if I have judged you as just some idiot, who only now that your own personal income is at risk, partially understands what is at stake with even more government control of healthcare.

13 posted on 03/20/2010 1:25:58 AM PDT by sarasmom (No incumbent re-elected, at any level of government office.(Period))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

“So to keep the boat afloat, the payouts by private insurers MUST increase to subsidize the ever increasing losses doctors incur by taking care of our government patients.”

About 15 years ago I had some surgery. I exclaimed to the Doc on how expensive it was. I guess this would have been right around the time of “Hillary Care”.

He told me “the U.S. already has socialized medicine”. Then went on to say the things in your post. I forget the actual numbers, but he said my minor surgery, which cost me (and my Insurance company) about $4,000 - was really worth about $2,000.

Just imagine what it will be after Obamacare. Except the doctors won’t get paid more. So why bother. Luckily the government will be there to solve the crisis. Probably using the General Motors plan.


14 posted on 03/20/2010 1:27:57 AM PDT by 21twelve (Having the Democrats in control is like a never-ending game of Calvin ball. (Giotto))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

I’ve tweeted it out — begging people to read it. Thank you. I completely agree with your assessment. I have such respect for doctors still working in the current environment, and you do not deserve a dramatic DOWNTURN in remuneration: you deserve an UPTURN, where the good docs can be plenty rewarded, and the not-so-good are left out. We need more of the real market in health care. More paying directly.


15 posted on 03/20/2010 1:33:39 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

We are governed by economic morons.

Until that changes, not much else will.


16 posted on 03/20/2010 1:45:14 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc

I just have to ask you to explain one sentence that underscores your entire argument here:

“Most people can see how this bill will rapidly reduce private insurance plans and rapidly expand government plan patients.”

How exactly do the current house and senate bills do this?

The current and future uninsured will be purchasing private insurance via exchanges and these premiums will be subsidized by our tax dollars...but it is still private insurance (which will be expanded). There is no public option or new government run insurance plan. Yes, Medicaid will be expanded to cover those at 133% of the poverty line but that isn’t a very big percentage of the uninsured. Those poorer are already on Medicaid.

Mandating the uninsured to purchase private insurance with subsidies will actually expand greatly the private insurance market by forcing millions of new customers to into the private insurance market and increase the risk pool as a whole and therefore strengthen private insurance from a financial standpoint.

Yes, those making over $250,000 will take it in the gut with a .9% increase in their medicare tax on their paychecks and investments under either of the bills considered but I don’t quite see how “government patients” will increase as a result of this plan.

Government patients WILL increase due to a vast increase in Medicare patients (baby boomers) about to hit the government dole and/or a further increase in unemployment due to national and global economic conditions which results in more Medicaid patients. But neither of those scenarios have anything to do with the bills being considered by either the house or senate....at least directly.

Is there a new government insurance plan that I am not aware of in the bills?


17 posted on 03/20/2010 1:48:55 AM PDT by jackmercer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackmercer
I just have to ask you to explain one sentence that underscores your entire argument here: “Most people can see how this bill will rapidly reduce private insurance plans and rapidly expand government plan patients.”

The system runs on such narrow margins that even a 5% increase in Medicaid will be rapidly fatal.

And even before that, any responsible insurance company board will shut down their about to be company-destroying health insurance subsidiary.

These shell "health insurers" won't last 60 days.

18 posted on 03/20/2010 1:54:36 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Let tyrants shake their iron rod, and slavery clank her galling chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: schwingdoc
VOTER
Read this later after coffee! ! ! ! !
19 posted on 03/20/2010 2:05:20 AM PDT by DeaconRed (B.O. Stinks: Don't Blame Me--------I Voted for the Wrinkley Old White RINO- - - - - - - - - - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“The system runs on such narrow margins that even a 5% increase in Medicaid will be rapidly fatal.”

Physicians and medical groups can reject medicare patients can they not? Also, to what economic data are you referring to conclude that a 5% increase in Medicaid patients would be rapidly fatal? We have had bigger jumps than that in the recent past without practice fatalities.

I am not saying that this isn’t a backdoor to single payer healthcare or “medicare for all” by crashing the private industry, which I actually think Obama wants to do, I am just trying to figure out how he’s gonna do it.

There will certainly be new regulations in place such as no lifetime caps on insurance and no denial of pre-existing conditions but I am still trying to understand how these bills are going to hurt the private insurance market by forcing 30 million new customers to buy from them.


20 posted on 03/20/2010 2:06:12 AM PDT by jackmercer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson