Skip to comments.
Could the President face impeachment, if the Supreme Court strikes the 'Slaughter Solution'?
Telegraph.co.uk ^
| March 19th, 2010
| Gerald Warner
Posted on 03/19/2010 5:44:15 PM PDT by fiodora
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: Nick Danger
IMHO we are not going to get by this weekend. There will be great opportunity if they pass this thing. The IRS will be in everyone's business and there will be great anger because of this. Properly focused this anger could rid us of the IRS and possibly lead to the repeal of the income tax amendment. I personally favor a national sales tax. No prebates no rebates no favorites. Everyone pays their share and NOBODY SKATES. Short of revolution this is the only way we can destroy the strangle hold the marxist have around our necks.
21
posted on
03/19/2010 6:06:32 PM PDT
by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: fiodora
With a Congress FULL of Democrats who want the SAME freakin’ thing?! What have you people been DRINKIN’?! NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
22
posted on
03/19/2010 6:08:35 PM PDT
by
patriot preacher
(To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
To: celtic gal
“What this out of the British press who hailed 0bama as a wonderful choice for America? I bet we couldnt even give 0bama to the Brits now.” HHAHAAHAHAHA!!
Thanks for the laughs, I am also very upset, but we need to keep on pushing to save our country!!!
ps: I divorced half of my friends and family...
23
posted on
03/19/2010 6:12:33 PM PDT
by
fiodora
To: fiodora
If he was facing me it would be more than just a meager impeachment!
24
posted on
03/19/2010 6:13:52 PM PDT
by
Doc Savage
(SOBAMP!)
To: allmendream
Impeachment is not a crime; it is a finding that a person is unfit to hold his or her current office. The House can impeach for any reason whatsoever. The Senate has to go along, and we’re not going to have 67 conservative Senators, I fear.
25
posted on
03/19/2010 6:14:19 PM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: allmendream
Reference to Ike's The Buck Stops Here sign*sigh*. The sign was Truman's.
If Obama knowingly signs, and attempts to enforce, an illegal bill he may be guilty of gross violation of his oath of office and an attempt to collude in the subversion of the constitution.
good enough for me.
To: fiodora
This guy in the Telegraph has never been on Obama’s side.
27
posted on
03/19/2010 6:14:43 PM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: allmendream
“How does he propose the President is criminally liable”
I am not sure, but doesn't the President have to sign something to make it law? Oh wait, that is in the Constitution and that old rag does not matter anymore. He is complicit by signing this abomination into law.
That Brit hack has a valid point, House members can either vote yea or nea for the bill or they can say I did not vote for the Senate HC bill, but I DID vote to circumvent the Constitution. They expect voters to accept that? We need to remind everyone, everyday if you vote for ANY Dem, you are voting for Pelosi and against the very document that this Nation was founded on.
To: fiodora
The bastard knows he is unconstitutionally occupying the White House.
The rest is small change.
29
posted on
03/19/2010 6:17:04 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, Guts and Guns made America great.)
To: celtic gal
This is a Blog on the UK Telegraph hosted by Gerald Warner. G.W. is not now nor ever was a fan of the One Bare-assed O’Bummer. He has consistently lambasted this worthless POS president since well before he was elected to the office. He is the genius who coined the term ‘President Pantywaist’.
30
posted on
03/19/2010 6:18:05 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: GAB-1955
“This guy in the Telegraph has never been on Obamas side.”
How could one forget: “Barack Obama: President Pantywaist new surrender monkey on the block”
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/9441479/Barack_Obama_President_Pantywaist__new_surrender_monkey_on_the_block/
Watch out, France and Co, there is a new surrender monkey on the block and, over the next four years, he will spectacularly sell out the interests of the West with every kind of liberal-delusionist initiative on nuclear disarmament and sitting down to negotiate with any power freak who wants to buy time to get a good ICBM fix on San Francisco, or wherever. If you thought the world was a tad unsafe with Dubya around, just wait until President Pantywaist gets into his stride.
31
posted on
03/19/2010 6:18:46 PM PDT
by
fiodora
To: Nuc1
I’m not so sure it WILL be SHORT of revolution. I think if they pull this garbage and then start using it for every item on Zero’s agenda (as some think they will), the civil unrest and mass disobedience will reach levels they have never seen in this country since the Civil War. And no, I’m not kidding. People ARE just THAT angry - and getting angrier by the day!!
32
posted on
03/19/2010 6:21:10 PM PDT
by
JLLH
To: fiodora
A Smith Act violation is a High Crime.
33
posted on
03/19/2010 6:21:50 PM PDT
by
cmj328
(Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
To: fiodora
Pelosi would never bring it to the floor if she did not have a way of winning. She likes the Senate bill, plans to add Government Health care later and than in ten years we will have single payer. The Dems that vote with her need to be tarred and feathered. If this passes Monday, we need to let these dirt bags know they screwed-up. We should call and tell them to stay in DC for there Easter break and all future breaks, they are no longer welcome home. Our ancestors knew how to handle ilk like our Dem politicians. The pressure needs to be kept up, they need to realize they screwed-up, if they voted no, it does not matter, they are Dems and they belong to Pelosi, she is allowing them to vote no.
To: fiodora
WE THE PEOPLE DEEM THIS BILL UNCONSTITUTIONAL ....
The important line in this article...
( " the fact remains that the fundamental purpose of the Slaughter Solution is to bypass the Constitution." )
35
posted on
03/19/2010 6:26:25 PM PDT
by
American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
To: allmendream
Constitutional jurisprudence from a hack Brit blog? Gerald Warner of Craigenmaddie is no hack.
That "hack blog" started publication in 1855 and has a larger print circulation than the UK Guardian and Independent combined.
To: Cobra64; FlingWingFlyer
37
posted on
03/19/2010 6:28:12 PM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(II Chronicles 7:14)
To: GAB-1955
“high crimes and misdemenors” is the Constitutional standard, not “for any reason whatsoever”.
38
posted on
03/19/2010 6:29:34 PM PDT
by
allmendream
(Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
To: fiodora
39
posted on
03/19/2010 6:31:12 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: musicman
1. You can’t impeach someone who isn’t in the office to begin with. We haven’t had a president since January 20, 2012, so there is no one to impeach.
2. A lying democrat could commit perjury under oath, abuse his office, and undermine the rule of law without getting convicted by members of his party. I don’t think a little bit of treason is going to upset Pelosi or Reid even a little bit.
40
posted on
03/19/2010 6:31:14 PM PDT
by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson